If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

If all of these fights were on at the same time, which would you watch?

Klitschko v Fury
26
18%
Fury v Joshua
7
5%
Joshua v Price
2
1%
Frampton v Quigg
18
12%
Khan v Brook
20
14%
Kovalev v Stevenson
16
11%
Maidana v Provodnikov
0
No votes
GGG v Froch
56
39%
 
Total votes: 145

Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Emmseegee »

Out of curiousity after being involved in a disagreement elsewhere.....
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by crusader »

Kovalev-Stevenson, with GGG-Froch being my second pick.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Sklar »

Fury vs Joshua.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32704
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

GGG v Froch for me. Fury v Wlad probably 2nd.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by ALI »

GGG v Froch
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by crusader »

Emmseegee wrote:Out of curiousity after being involved in a disagreement elsewhere.....
Care to elaborate on the disagreement?
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Emmseegee »

crusader wrote:
Emmseegee wrote:Out of curiousity after being involved in a disagreement elsewhere.....
Care to elaborate on the disagreement?
Towards the end of this thread.....
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=189739
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1079
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by ScottDetonator »

I know Fury is a hard gypsy warrior but surely it's even beyond him to beat both Wladimir Klitschko and AJ on the same night.
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Emmseegee »

ScottDetonator wrote:I know Fury is a hard gypsy warrior but surely it's even beyond him to beat both Wladimir Klitschko and AJ on the same night.
Haha, ok thats a good one i deserved that. Lol.

Maybe he gets Ko'd early in one and fights in the second fight sanctioned by luxemborg.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23033
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by handsofstone »

All great fights but I went with Frampton-Quigg who are both at least top 5 in their division from this country,Scott takes a lot of stick on here,a lot of which is due to his promoter,match making and paper title I think

Ability wise I think he's a great fighter who IMO if he fought Rigondeaux tomorrow, would give Rigo his toughest test yet,Id edge Carl over him though who would push Rigo even harder than Quigg
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Stuarty »

Probably Frampton v Quigg as Frampton is my favourite fighter but Brook v Khan would be an interesting clash of styles and probably guaranteed excitement! I think GGG is all wrong for Froch and he should stay away.
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Emmseegee »

Stuarty30 wrote:Probably Frampton v Quigg as Frampton is my favourite fighter but Brook v Khan would be an interesting clash of styles and probably guaranteed excitement! I think GGG is all wrong for Froch and he should stay away.
Couldnt see froch possibly ever beating GGG but imagine he pulled that one off........
Its worth the risk (especially since it wouldnt be me getting whacked)
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by bigjack »

ALI wrote:GGG v Froch

x2 followed by Fury v Joshua
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by GooalaShooola »

1) Golovkin v Froch
2) Kovalev v Stevenson
3) Frampton v Quigg
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Monte Fisto »

Went for khan vs brook, I enjoy watching khan and think this would be a very spicey affair and great build up.
Kov vs Stevenson a close second.

18 months ago I'd have said any maidana fight, but I'm fearing he may now have silk pj's since his mayweather bouts.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by pyenest77 »

Frampton v Quigg. I just think it would be best fight of that lot & would be some atmosphere.
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by brian13 »

GGG / Froch but I would record Kovalev / Stevenson because I want to see Kovalev put Stevenson in his place.
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by lefthook82 »

Great question by the way

Had to think hard about this one but went with Kovalev v Stevenson. Those guys have nuclear power and just the anticipation of waiting to see who lands hardest first would make for a great spectacle

GGG V Froch would have topped it but I don't think GGG stands a chance against him. Too small and too easy to hit
TopGun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by TopGun »

Cannot pick.....probably one of the hardest questions I have ever been asked.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by bigjack »

[quote="lefthook82"]Great question by the way

Had to think hard about this one but went with Kovalev v Stevenson. Those guys have nuclear power and just the anticipation of waiting to see who lands hardest first would make for a great spectacle

GGG V Froch would have topped it but I don't think GGG stands a chance against him. Too small and too easy to hit[/quote]

I thought that watching Murray hit him at will,if Martin had some real pop in his punches it would have been much more interesting i think,still would love to see him and Froch go at it.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10939
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by ILikeBeer »

Audley Harrison vs David Price 2. :yay:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by TheGman »

Frampton vs quigg followed by ggg vs froch or joshua vs fury,hard picks though some tasty fights :TU: .
Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Spiker »

I would watch Klit knock out Fury in 1 round then quickly turn over watch Froch getting beaten up by GGG for 7 rounds then turn over again to see Khan finishing brook off to a points decision. Its all about the channel flicking baby! :geek2:
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by Tomasino »

crusader wrote:Kovalev-Stevenson, with GGG-Froch being my second pick.

Same
magwitch
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: If all these fights were on TV at the same time, which ONE would u watch?

Post by magwitch »

Surprised myself there by going for Klit Fury. Unfortunately i think Klit would turn up at 95-100% and Fury probably would not. I think for me, Wladimir is a world class big athlete and Fury simply has world class height and reach.

I don't think Brook would make a mark on Khan at this stage but the fight between the supermiddleweights would really interest me. I'd favour Kovalev.
Post Reply