Difference between revisions of "Miguel Angel Cotto vs. DeMarcus Corley"

From BoxRec
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
--Fight was stopped too soon in my eyes.  Corley went down on purpose the 2nd time and he could have easily continued to fight.  I'm not saying that he would have won, but the fight shouldn't have been waived off at that point.  Cotto is still a good fighter, but some defensive flaws are showing.
 
--Fight was stopped too soon in my eyes.  Corley went down on purpose the 2nd time and he could have easily continued to fight.  I'm not saying that he would have won, but the fight shouldn't have been waived off at that point.  Cotto is still a good fighter, but some defensive flaws are showing.
 +
Mo_boxing

Revision as of 21:40, 15 March 2005

--Corley down once in the first rd & twice in the 5th. Cotto staggered & reeling in the 3rd. Both boxers were penalized 1 point for low blows.

--Fight was stopped too soon in my eyes. Corley went down on purpose the 2nd time and he could have easily continued to fight. I'm not saying that he would have won, but the fight shouldn't have been waived off at that point. Cotto is still a good fighter, but some defensive flaws are showing. Mo_boxing