Search found 2139 matches
- 24 Feb 2025, 03:11
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Bug? Padley Ranking
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7740
Re: Bug? Padley Ranking
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/871755 Ranked #56 at Lightweight (before Stevenson fight) The boxer he just beat (Chamberlain) is #20 at Lightweight. Noticed that fight was at 140... Neither have had a fight since... Some kind of bug with the divisional changes? Padley is #32 Lightweight and Chamberl...
- 15 Jan 2025, 06:35
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: 817093 ranking
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1846
Re: 817093 ranking
I'm Marius Antonietti 817093 id I wanted to ask for information on my ranking, after beating Gregorio Dominguez, boxer 520th in the ranking and with a star, I won by tko and I didn't get a star, instead I was always told that if you win with a boxer with a boxrec star you get a star. After this mat...
- 11 Jan 2025, 04:41
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3847
Re: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
Martin look at Lennox Lewis' record from 1989-1992? he couldn't be #1 it's too obvious. His best opposition during this period, Donovan Ruddock, did not even enter the top 10 Annual Ratings in 1992. Then when Evander Holyfield and Riddick Bowie shared the 2nd and 3rd positions of this rating. but o...
- 10 Jan 2025, 16:53
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3847
Re: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
Hi Martin. There are bugs in the Lennox Lewis rating. 1992 year №1- Riddick Bowe; 1993 year №1-Evander Holyfield; 1994 year №1-Riddick Bowe; 1995 year №1-Riddick Bowe; 1996 year №1-Riddick Bowe; 1997-2003 year №1-Lennox Lewis. check their ratings and you will see for yourself.) Lewis had the higher...
- 09 Jan 2025, 12:59
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3847
Re: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
2024 is live ...computerrank wrote: ↑07 Jan 2025, 04:23will do ...pugilisticspecialist wrote: ↑06 Jan 2025, 18:59 https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php/BoxRe ... al_Ratings![]()

- 07 Jan 2025, 13:15
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
This one is not bad... Toss up between this one and the first change you posted. I'd like to see... Lopez (105), Wilde (112), Galaxy (115), Pep (126) at #1 Jofre (118), Gomez (122), Robinson (147/160), Greb (160), Moore (175) as high as possible. Leonard/Duran seem to be consistently top 2 (135), s...
- 07 Jan 2025, 04:23
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3847
Re: BoxRec's Annual Ratings need updating to include 2024
will do ...pugilisticspecialist wrote: ↑06 Jan 2025, 18:59 https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php/BoxRe ... al_Ratings

- 06 Jan 2025, 05:56
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
This one is not bad... Toss up between this one and the first change you posted. I'd like to see... Lopez (105), Wilde (112), Galaxy (115), Pep (126) at #1 Jofre (118), Gomez (122), Robinson (147/160), Greb (160), Moore (175) as high as possible. Leonard/Duran seem to be consistently top 2 (135), s...
- 05 Jan 2025, 12:11
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
Yes, I think itd be impossible to please everyone. I think the most important part is to ensure the ironclad #1s are ranked first.. arguable #1s are ranked first or close... and there are no fighters ranked #1 that have no business being close to that... Then move on from there. stronger on #1: 1 M...
- 04 Jan 2025, 07:39
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
For the fight-specific points in all-time ratings... are you able to limit those points to the division that the boxer is currently assigned? Even partially? Even if you have to include bouts which there is no division set? The bouts outside of the boxer's division - in higher and lower divisions ....
- 02 Jan 2025, 18:00
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
Is part of the issue that the actual rankings are not valued enough? Surely a guy who got #1 in a division a handful of times or more, should be at or near the top... simply by that fact. No? I guess it is much more complicated - sometimes more from one perspective looking at one boxer, sometimes l...
- 02 Jan 2025, 16:55
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
As expected... good and bad. Wilde #32, a horrific placement.... getting him into the top few spots is critical IMO. Pep down from #1 to #3. Unfortunate, not the end of the world... Guessing Marquez is getting assistance from things he did in other divisions. Kilbane at #2 is interesting though. Gr...
- 02 Jan 2025, 14:33
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
I think you found the solution. Not sure what other ramification this will cause... but Wilde at #32 is a major flaw. 1 Minimumweight Ricardo Lopez 628 9 618 2 Minimumweight Rosendo Alvarez 75 5 70 3 Minimumweight Thammanoon Niyomtrong 59 2 56 4 Minimumweight Chana Porpaoin 45 5 39 5 Minimumweight ...
- 02 Jan 2025, 08:07
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
In 1913, 1918 and 1919 Wilde didn't make the cut. He must have been pretty disappointed in 1913 to go 30-0-0-4(NC) and not make the end of the year rankings! Clearly something is wrong. #3 guy was 1-0 career with a win over 5-0. #5 guy was 1-0 career with a win over 3-0. #6 guy was 1-0 career with ...
- 31 Dec 2024, 08:48
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
It does seem that he has to be better than #32. I don't pretend to understand how the rankings work. Curious if him fighting so early works against him. He is regarded as the very first flyweight champion. Therefore, he doesn't have a big name that he beat that was the champ before him. Wondering i...
- 29 Dec 2024, 18:48
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
Hm. Something is wrong here. I think we both can agree that Wilde should be way closer to #1 than #32.... His bouts and his rank and his opponents_rank: "1914-11-16 2 39" "1915-01-25 2 14" "1916-02-14 2 49" "1916-06-26 1 23" "1918-08-31 10 54" "...
- 29 Dec 2024, 06:19
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7610
Re: Jimmy Wilde All-Time Ranking at Flyweight
Last time I looked, I thought he was in the Top 5... I know there have been system changes and I know that the bout histories back then were weak, but #32? The AT ratings are the sum of points for best opponents defeated and points for best rankings per year. Here is the list for top40 Flyweights: ...
- 14 Nov 2024, 18:40
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Lara Ochmann 846768
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2126
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Hello, I have a question about the female fighter Lara Ochmann 846768. How is it possible that despite winning fights, she continues to fall in the rankings? January 2024 - 20th place featherweight (German female rating - 7th place) August 2024 - 39th place featherweight (German female 10th) rating...
- 06 Nov 2024, 10:43
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
https://boxrec.com/en/iba-pro/733152 Is there a plan to add star ratings to IBA pro fights? All of them are unrated, except for this one... Currently no ratings for IBA_pro fights are calculated. So, why does this one have a 4 star rating? :neutral: It seems to have been entered as box-pro first - ...
- 05 Nov 2024, 11:42
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Currently no ratings for IBA_pro fights are calculated.Manrae wrote: ↑05 Nov 2024, 00:54 https://boxrec.com/en/iba-pro/733152
Is there a plan to add star ratings to IBA pro fights? All of them are unrated, except for this one...
- 14 Oct 2024, 02:58
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
That makes sense.. if used in the ratings.. it is sort of like punishing a boxer for being tall or being southpaw... yet this is an advantage they have in every fight. Same applies if they almost always fight a home. You should look at age and reach! I did and there was not significant influence ad...
- 13 Oct 2024, 15:44
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
That makes sense.. if used in the ratings.. it is sort of like punishing a boxer for being tall or being southpaw... yet this is an advantage they have in every fight. Same applies if they almost always fight a home. You should look at age and reach! I did and there was not significant influence ad...
- 13 Oct 2024, 11:31
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
I'm curious if the Japanese boxers benefit in the ratings by having a strong "hometown" advantage. That'd be fun to analyze... Maybe it is just me... but these top guys NEVER leave the country... Over the years, it has felt like they've performed so much better at home.... and vice versa....
- 13 Oct 2024, 05:17
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
I'm curious if the Japanese boxers benefit in the ratings by having a strong "hometown" advantage. That'd be fun to analyze... Maybe it is just me... but these top guys NEVER leave the country... Over the years, it has felt like they've performed so much better at home.... and vice versa....
- 05 Oct 2024, 16:25
- Forum: Rating Queries
- Topic: Ratings - please read before commenting
- Replies: 723
- Views: 170314
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The only specific BoxRec modification is the winner-above-loser rule, which on tendency has a bit lower predictive percentage.