Here is where posting some type of ranking (either past or present) would be beneficial: Any time an "unranked" (inactive) boxer fights, people just getting into the sport and using Boxrec as a reference could have no idea how good the boxer is when all the ranking says is "N/R."...

I've read the arguments for not posting the actual numbers for the ratings, but I think they should still be shown. The most helpful instance would be bringing back the ratings "before and after" in the matchup section. I follow the sport pretty closely, but sometimes I'd like to have a li...

I've read the arguments for not posting the actual numbers for the ratings, but I think they should still be shown. The most helpful instance would be bringing back the ratings "before and after" in the matchup section. I follow the sport pretty closely, but sometimes I'd like to have a l...

I've read the arguments for not posting the actual numbers for the ratings, but I think they should still be shown. The most helpful instance would be bringing back the ratings "before and after" in the matchup section. I follow the sport pretty closely, but sometimes I'd like to have a li...

computerrank wrote: ↑07 Oct 2022, 06:25 BoxRec is just swamped by more prior requirements at the moment.

Thanks -- at least you got some feedback. Hopefully they will address it when they have the chance.

Yea also the star ratings are just for the "importance" of the overall bout, so you can't tell which fighter was the favorite or more highly rated at the time of the bout. It's not remotely as useful. Yes, this is the key. It's almost impossible now to see how a fighter's career played ou...

So we are never again going to see actual numbers on the ratings page or on the matchup pages?

The schedule on the homepage used to show the big upcoming fights. Now it just shows any upcoming fights. Could that be reverted? Boxer stats require an extra interaction (click or tap) - that was better before as well. I secound that. That was the best thing about the site. You knew weeks beforeha...

So, I guess we're not gonna get any answers about the disappearance of the ratings or any of the other negative changes. I want to continue using the sight, but I need reassurance that these issues are at least being looked at.

The ratings were very helpful for if I was unfamiliar with two boxers, if a boxer was coming off a layoff and was not ranked. I don't watch as much as some boxing fans, so having the ratings at least gives me some type of metric to use when deciding what to catch on a given weekend.

I mentioned it in the ratings thread, but this seems to be the more appropriate place. Please make the ratings visual again. This includes the "after fight" ratings that used to be on the "bout page." Thanks

I, too, would like to see the ratings displayed on the record, rankings, and matchups pages as they were on the previous site.

Would you please give an example. Sorry, it was actually the bout/card page which has different numbers. Breazeale is one example. On the ratings page he has a score of 264.2 (http://boxrec.com/en/ratings?offset=0&sex=M&division=Heavyweight) but if you click on his bout page with Wilder (ht...

There appears to be some discrepancy in the ratings between some boxers pages and their corresponding "score" in the ratings section. I assume the ratings page figure is the more accurate one?