Which actually I understand and I think you make sound factual points. But this for me it feels irresponsible to claim a record as a fact without then approaching BBBoC or having any sort of written statement clarifying the discrepancy. What in fact seems to be happening is that BBBoC have released ...

That's true of VADA but UKAD are able to impose bans no? VADA are purely advisory but UKAD can (and in this case did) charge. That makes them more than just a separate ltd company. Also without trying to be pedantic I've posted a legal statement that stated BBBoC have agreed to the terms. The NC was...

Have you got a reference to that rule? UKAD are able to impose sanctions and their legal statement clearly states that BBBoC agree to the terms, I''ve not seen anything in writing to suggest otherwise. Happy to be proved wrong

You're wrong, as per the statement on the UKAD website. https://ukad.org.uk/news/article/UKAD-and-Mr-Tyson-Fury-and-Mr-Hughie-Fury-issue-joint-statement "The proceedings have therefore been resolved on the following basis: the anti-doping rule violations based on the reported presence of elevat...

Fury's record on this website shows as a win vs Christian Hammer but that result was disqualified and is officially a no contest. His record should also therefore show 31 bouts, 29 wins, 1 draw.

Understand many people won't like it, but what is on this website is factually inaccurate