everybody calls him julian or jules, not jim and he says he had 60 odd fights, not 30 odd as boxrec say. then again he is a fornicating tool and he is full of shit. he fought that dude 6 times! hahahaha. he also killed someone on his pro debut. he's the anti midas. everything he touches turns to shi...

when naz was robbed of his p4p number one spot and was outboxed by barrera. he was robbed by a dumb corner who couldnt handle an instinctive fighter. they gave him a double dose and an overdose about the doctrine of boxing. they should have let him be and focused on getting him in good shape and mak...

doesnt matter about the pacman loss. he has more notable wins on his ko's and has beaten morales. he will win the rematch of course. EVEN IF HE DONT HE COMES ON TOP OF THIS TRIANGLE BECAUSE HE BEAT THEM BOTH! here is how i think it goes

barrera
prince naseem
morales (ducked naseem so comes out last)

danny lopez and wilfredo gomez do not hit harder than naz. they did not create as many early knockouts and one punch knockouts against elite opposition. in fact they didn't even do it against bums and chumps! forget champs like vasquez, kelly and johnson. them guys couldn't fell journeymen the way n...

I spoke with my father today about this topic, I thought I might share his opinion. Personally i'd never say something so offensive but I thought it was a bit funny. My father is a Mexican man who's followed boxing for 63 years. He can't speak English very well, but when he gets riled up he'll say ...

now i really do have to go! i need to get my priorities right. it was really good chatting shit wi you guys but now its back to real life and really important stuff. ( i iwsh i knew it 4 hours a go). all i got to say is ricardo lopez i sdefinitely a fraud. you guys need to check that out seriously. ...

if u seen rocky marciano fight, then u would realize he threw non stop punches, with very effective aggresion as well as wearing his opponents down with body attack. how else did marciano outpoint charles over 15 rounds??? not a lot of guys can outpoint a master boxer in charles. marciano had a KO ...

ok i disagree, rocky outpointed a master boxer in charles over 15 rounds and if u watched charles-marciano I it was fought at one of the most gruelling fights i have ever seen. both showed incredible stamina and skills. charles displayed great boxing skills and alots of speed in early rounds and ro...

u dont undestand man. hopkins beat tito at 38 !!! that was his peak walcott prime was like hopkins, in thirties. walcott did beat a prime ezzard charles. charles was only 29 and now a fully fledged heavyweight who hadnt lossed in years and was enhoying a long reign. charles was still in his prime. ...

goodbye, im sorry but i have to go. one thing, check up lopez's record and get tapes of his opponents and profiles if you can. trust me he was the biggest fraud in the history of the sport. minimumweights are a real scandal! they make the current heavyweights look like the creme de la creme. a real ...

walcott was a better boxer than norton IMO and would have beat norton. do u realize how good walcott was, he could knock u out with one punch and was a great stylist boxer. he had so many tricks up his sleeve. did u ever see walcott-marciano fight???? walcott was incosistent and he started off badl...

wow ur reasoning is very flawed. britpack wrote walcott was old and a young one would have taken away that 0 walcott was still in his prime agaisnt marciano, he was coming off two wins over a prime ezzard charles. walcott fought one of his best fights against marciano, walcott didnt even become a c...

my revised list. still cant remeber number 7! 1 ali 2 louis 3 johnson 4 frazier 5 dempsey 6 remeber his face but the name is drawing a blank! 7 foreman 8 norton 9 marciano 10 holmes you made me doubt norton, so ill have to watch all his fights again and all his peers before making sure he really was...

i dont think arciano showed a lack of boxing skills against walcott, first of marciano wasnt a boxer, he didnt have boxing skills. he was a slugger/swarmer. he had a different style of fighting then most. and wlacott is one of the greatest defensive fighters/stylist boxers in history of heavyweight...

britpack wrote norton was solid and could have beaten marciano in my view not only do i think rocky would KO norton, its A HORRIBLE style matchup for norton. norton was at his worst against big punchers. u saw what foreman and shavers did to norton. marciano would knock out norton inside of 5 round...

Rory McCloskey wrote:are you thinking of liston? ezzard? tyson?

im sure it is someone else. i dont know what happened there. i always had soemone at number 7. im sure it aint one of them. definitely not tyson. no room for a flash in the pan!

norton at 5? frazier a little too high.. holmes and rocky too low... 1) Joe Louis 2) Muhammad 3) Jack Johnson 4) Rocky Marciano 5) Jack Dempsey 6) Larry Holmes 7) Joe Frazier 8 ) George Foreman 9) Sonny Liston 10)Ezzard Charles haha u know if u make the number 8.. then put a ) next to it like i did...

britpack wrote 5 norton now thats a joke. hes not a top 15 or 20 heavyweight. decent list, holmes and marciano are way to low, both should be in top 5 IMO. and whos ur # 7????? i forgot his name but remember his face!!!!! i hate it when i do that. holmes would be higher but he never fought anybody ...

but unlike u i have seen the fights because i have most of them on tape or DVD!!!!! - why do u keep bringing up ricardo lopez??? i rate him 61st all time. do u have a fetish with him or something??? LOCK THE THREAD BARRY, this guy britpack is ridiculous. i dont have a fetish with him you sicko. i k...

ok then that means u dont have much knowladge cause unlike u, i have seen tapes and fights of all the heavyweight champions i rate. u see i actually have my own room where i store all my boxing tapes and dvds. i collect and have a lot of fight films. i have studied the tapes over and over again eve...

okay britpack.. since your so wise in pugilistic ways why dont you make us a top 100 list with no flaws, and none that are questionable whatsoever, thats a great list when you think of the sheer number of great fighters in the history of boxing, trying to place each great fighter in the correct spo...

well ur gonna have to prove u have more knowlege than me cause i just dont see it. lets see ur top 10 heavyweight list all time and top 20 fighters all time ill do that when i have actually WATCHED all the fighters entire careers. then i can make a decsion. i have actually seen lopez's career. i ta...

ricardo lopez my hero??? actually no. i dont even really like him, but i give him a fairshake and respect unlike u. woa woa there buddy, did u have bolemia or an anarexic problem???? u get really emotional over humans weighing under 110 lbs. isnt it a little past ur bed time??? my heros are rocky m...

wow you got a lot of hate in u. u said gatti sucks???? hes a two time champion and one of the biggest warriors in histor of division. how would u know u have more knowledge than me, u dont even know me?? - whats with the personal attacks on ricardo lopez????? did he refuse to sign u a autograph and...

who the hell is this guy britpack??? :lol: :roll: :o i didnt know we had bert sugar on boxrec. :lol: :lol: you're list proves you are retarded and worse than bert sugar. i have to go because some poeple actually have to work. but before i do i suggest you do your homework on your retarded hero know...