Search found 633 matches
- 17 Dec 2019, 00:37
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
OK then... There’s no mention of contamination or B-sample testing in that quote, is there? The main assertions in your previous post about the UKAD/Whyte situation refer directly to the existence of alleged rules about contamination and B-sample testing, but you can’t qualify your claims can you? :...
- 16 Dec 2019, 21:03
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
Should I, or shouldn't I?
You've just done exactly what I said there, EO, and then gone a bit further.
Ignoring the central point - check
Semantics - check
Missing context - check
Strawman - check
You've just done exactly what I said there, EO, and then gone a bit further.
Ignoring the central point - check
Semantics - check
Missing context - check
Strawman - check
- 15 Dec 2019, 22:53
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
"2.1.1 It is each Athlete’s personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters his/her body. An Athlete is responsible for any Prohibited Substance or any of its Metabolites or Markers found to be present in his/her Sample. Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, negligen...
- 15 Dec 2019, 21:54
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
Whyte declined the opportunity to have his B sample tested. Under UKAD rules, contamination is not considered an acceptable defence. Have you read UKAD’s rules? If you want to challenge me on my assertions about Dillian Whyte’s situation and UKAD’s rules, without performing research, then please do...
- 15 Dec 2019, 19:34
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Tyson Fury and Ben Davison Part Ways
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1088
Re: Tyson Fury and Ben Davison Part Ways
I'm not totally surprised by the split, just by the timing. Wondering if this will impact the rematch in February. Anyone know who Sugar HIll Steward works with of note? A(hole) Dirrell. Or was co-trainer :maybe: Adonis Stevenson, too. I think Fury did a few training sessions at Kronk years ago, wh...
- 15 Dec 2019, 17:02
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
WHYTE tested positive for DIANABOL & the B sample was never tested. According to UKAD’s very own rules, Dillian Whytes’s B-sample would only have ever been tested after they had actually charged him with an offence - not beforehand . There’s no conspiracy, because UKAD’s rules about this proces...
- 11 Dec 2019, 18:55
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Is Deontay Wilder really a good guy pretending to be bad ?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 1574
Re: Is Deontay Wilder really a good guy pretending to be bad ?
There are far worse characters in boxing. Being loud and obnoxious aren't that bad, in the grand scheme of things.
- 11 Dec 2019, 18:41
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
what is actually "an isolated contamination event"?..sounds like they created a convenient excuse and a precedent for any future doper... Unless they're trying to say dianabol was already in the cup Whyte pissed into, which is ridiculous, then it shouldn't matter. Contamination = guilt, a...
- 11 Dec 2019, 17:35
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3602
Re: UKAD clears Dillian Whyte - charges dropped!
A couple of things I don't really understand: "In light of the above points, the trace amounts of metabolites found in the 20 June 2019 sample are consistent with an isolated contamination event, and they are not suggestive of doping." Readily available information on dianabol, states it h...
- 07 Dec 2019, 22:01
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: So, who is the next for Anthony Joshua ?
- Replies: 62
- Views: 2462
Re: So, who is the next for Anthony Joshua ?
Usyk has been ordered by the WBA, to take place within 180 days. If rumours from a month or two are correct, the IBF will also order Pulev.
It's definitely one of those next.
It's definitely one of those next.
- 07 Dec 2019, 21:47
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
- Replies: 93
- Views: 3417
- 07 Dec 2019, 16:33
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua 2 - December 7, 2019
- Replies: 553
- Views: 24299
Re: Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua 2 - December 7, 2019
116-112 Hunter, for me.
- 06 Dec 2019, 16:01
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Counttime Clock shows clearly Tyson fury lost
- Replies: 41
- Views: 1973
Re: Counttime Clock shows clearly Tyson fury lost
You'd think people who were interested enough in boxing to sign up to a boxing forum, might also be interested enough to find out the rules of the sport. Apparently not. :doh: Not every rule is cut and dry. If a fighter's feet are on the floor but his back is at a 45 degree angle is he up? The figh...
- 06 Dec 2019, 14:00
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Counttime Clock shows clearly Tyson fury lost
- Replies: 41
- Views: 1973
Re: Counttime Clock shows clearly Tyson fury lost
You'd think people who were interested enough in boxing to sign up to a boxing forum, might also be interested enough to find out the rules of the sport.
Apparently not.
Apparently not.
- 01 Dec 2019, 14:41
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Dillian Whyte V Deontay Wilder
- Replies: 173
- Views: 6704
Re: Dillian Whyte V Deontay Wilder
Were date and venue sorted already for the 50 m offer Wilder made in public? No. It also wasn't a $50m purse offer. It was for the full rights to the fight, which would have excluded Matchroom and Sky. Ah, so none of these cats wanna give a date or a venue. Arent contracts signed for Wilder-Fury 2 ...
- 14 Nov 2019, 22:29
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Eddie Hearn could be banned from promoting in Las Vegas for ‘violating Ali Act’
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1319
Re: Eddie Hearn could be banned from promoting in Las Vegas for ‘violating Ali Act’
eddie will just sell the fights elswhere plenty other options in the US where they love boxing According to the Ali act. No state commission can license a fighter serving a suspension in another state. Arizona have agreed to stage it though, apparently. Wouldn't that put them in breach of the Ali a...
- 12 Nov 2019, 21:32
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
- Replies: 99
- Views: 3089
Re: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
I'm not disputing that timeline, but you missed something out. 14/12/2015 - WBC announce that it will allow Alvarez and Golovkin one interim fight in the spring, based on an agreement to face each other by September 2016. So, Canelo knew he had to face Golovkin in November 2015, and he knew when th...
- 12 Nov 2019, 16:56
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
- Replies: 99
- Views: 3089
Re: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
This. Canelo had 6 months to agree terms to fight Golovkin (Nov 2015, up to the WBC's deadline in late May the following year). After he beat Cotto, he asked for an interim fight, based on an agreement to face Golovkin in September 2016, to allow him time to properly acclimatise to middleweight (wh...
- 12 Nov 2019, 12:55
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
- Replies: 99
- Views: 3089
Re: Saunders may be an appealing good scalp for Canelo atm
WBC already did Canelo a favor allowing to "defend" against Khan and keep his belt. Canelo and Oscar knew right after beating Cotto that they need to reach an agreement with GGG. They didn't learn something new after the Khan fight. This. Canelo had 6 months to agree terms to fight Golovk...
- 07 Nov 2019, 12:59
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: WBSS Bantamweight Final: Naoya Inoue vs. Nonito Donaire - November 7, 2019
- Replies: 132
- Views: 7293
Re: WBSS Bantamweight Final: Naoya Inoue vs. Nonito Donaire - November 7, 2019
Can't see the judge that had it 6 rounds each, but close fight anyway. Great fight! I gave Donaire 2, 3, 8 and 9, but 4 and 7 were probably close enough they could have been scored either way. It's a stretch, but sat in a fixed position for the full 12, it's possible a judge could see Donaire winni...
- 04 Nov 2019, 16:28
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Canelo vs Kovalyov - what was your scorecard?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 858
Re: Canelo vs Kovalyov - what was your scorecard?
:TU: None of it matters much. It's like saying McGregor was on even terms with Floyd. Yes sir you are right. It was a good knockout and no matter who was winning canelo earned the ko victory I wasn't trying to take anything away from Canelo. Kovalev tired, at least partly, due to Canelo's tactics. ...
- 03 Nov 2019, 06:40
- Forum: Round By Round
- Topic: Round-by-Round: Saúl 'Canelo' Álvarez vs. Segey 'Krusher' Kovalev - November 2, 2019
- Replies: 299
- Views: 8806
Re: Round-by-Round: Saúl 'Canelo' Álvarez vs. Segey 'Krusher' Kovalev - November 2, 2019
Kov was tired by then. Punch resistance is always lower when a fighter is tired. He was definitely hurt by it. Yeah, you could see by the way he reacted to the cuffing left just before the 1-2. Thing is its not like the fight was fought at a high tempo either. He fought a much higher tempo against ...
- 03 Nov 2019, 06:29
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Canelo vs. Kovalev Official Scorecards
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1753
Re: Canelo vs. Kovalev Official Scorecards
I think you could legitimately score it anywhere from 97-93 Kovalev, to 96-94 Canelo, with rounds 2, 4 and 5 being so close.
Having said that, I do have some issue with a couple of the individual round scores on the Moretti and Lederman cards. Round 1 or 9 to Canelo? Really?
Having said that, I do have some issue with a couple of the individual round scores on the Moretti and Lederman cards. Round 1 or 9 to Canelo? Really?
- 03 Nov 2019, 06:19
- Forum: Current Scene
- Topic: Canelo vs Kovalyov - what was your scorecard?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 858
Re: Canelo vs Kovalyov - what was your scorecard?
1. Kovalev 2. Kovalev (close) 3. Kovalev 4. Canelo (close) 5. Even 6. Canelo 7. Canelo 8. Kovalev 9. Kovalev 10. Canelo 96-95 Kovalev Rounds 1, 3, 8 and 9 were clear Kov rounds, with 6, 7 and 10 clear for Canelo. The score after 10 depends on what you valued most in rounds 2, 4 and 5. You could reli...
- 03 Nov 2019, 06:08
- Forum: Round By Round
- Topic: Round-by-Round: Saúl 'Canelo' Álvarez vs. Segey 'Krusher' Kovalev - November 2, 2019
- Replies: 299
- Views: 8806