British Boxing Clichés
British Boxing Clichés
Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
ElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Flawless. You have killed your own thread.ElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Great summary!ElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
I think any fighter from a country that the commentators know little about will be described as 'tough'.... including Korea, Japan, Philippines, Hawaii, the Faroe islands (ok maybe not!)....
I prefer Nigel Benn's summary of weak journeyman as being 'Mexican road sweepers' although these days maybe Latvian road sweepers might be more appropriate....
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32957
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: British Boxing Clichés
I don't have anything to add, just thought I'd be the 4th consecutive person to needlessly quote this excellent but somewhat long post in its entiretyElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: British Boxing Clichés
Boxerbeetle wrote:I don't have anything to add, just thought I'd be the 4th consecutive person to needlessly quote this excellent but somewhat long post in its entiretyElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.![]()
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3164
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: British Boxing Clichés
German doesn't do anything fancy, but British has it all to do tonight to beat him on home soil.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
I'm reading all of these in Halling's voice.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
dookus wrote:Flawless. You have killed your own thread.ElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.
I can remember an Australian kid coming over about 2 to fight the Welsh lad (now Champion I believe)...Selby I think. The Australian was unbeaten and put on an honest showing and was just outgunned in the end but definitely not excessively matched..... I forget what they said about the Aussie tbh... You'd expect them to have great physiques with all that protein from the barbecue and surfing and whatnot.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
crusader wrote:![]()
I'm reading all of these in Halling's voice.
I think it was written to be read as Halling tbh
Re: British Boxing Clichés
How did I forget the Germans!? That can of worms could have a section all to itself. From the perennial round stealers to the apparent necessity to reel off every close decision that has gone against British fighters in Germany, our commentators and pundits have a field day over there.Grilling Machine wrote:German doesn't do anything fancy, but British has it all to do tonight to beat him on home soil.
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Salute
Teak tough, leather skinned, iron chinned, slick, big punching.... Nothing to do with a guys race!
Teak tough, leather skinned, iron chinned, slick, big punching.... Nothing to do with a guys race!
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: British Boxing Clichés
He's well schooled, very strong and hard to hit, but not exceptional in any department.... But he's hard to beat, no question.."Grilling Machine wrote:German doesn't do anything fancy, but British has it all to do tonight to beat him on home soil.
(Said in a Jim Watt voice)
-
littleton.barry
- Welterweight
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 13 May 2016, 08:52
Re: British Boxing Clichés
I think you're forgetting that you can only beat what's put in front of you.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
“Well Duke....what did we learn from that?”
“Not much is the honest answer.”
“Not much is the honest answer.”
Re: British Boxing Clichés
ElJefe......perfect
Personally, I've always liked the way each and every Scandinavian fighting at cruiserweight/heavyweight must be automatically cross-referenced with Ingemar Johansson with the 'Hammer of Thor' or 'Ingo's Bingo' thrown in just for good measure. Perhaps a lazy Viking reference added too.
Rule No.1 when dealing with big, chubby northern European lads....they might be the second coming of Ingemar.
"He does not look in great shape and has lost his last three by early stoppage but who can forget what Johansson did to the great Floyd Patterson all those years ago? Some of these big Scandinavian lads pack a dangerous punch."
Big Scandinavian (usually) duly flattened.
Personally, I've always liked the way each and every Scandinavian fighting at cruiserweight/heavyweight must be automatically cross-referenced with Ingemar Johansson with the 'Hammer of Thor' or 'Ingo's Bingo' thrown in just for good measure. Perhaps a lazy Viking reference added too.
Rule No.1 when dealing with big, chubby northern European lads....they might be the second coming of Ingemar.
"He does not look in great shape and has lost his last three by early stoppage but who can forget what Johansson did to the great Floyd Patterson all those years ago? Some of these big Scandinavian lads pack a dangerous punch."
Big Scandinavian (usually) duly flattened.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: British Boxing Clichés
This thread could be the first 4 chapters of Nick Hallings memoirs.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Car washersreggaereggae wrote:Great summary!ElJefe wrote:Terry Flanagan's next opponent has all the hall marks of a "teak tough" African fighter, who, along with every other African, promises to "make it a hard nights work" for the lightweight champion. Whilst their skill sets vary, one thing we can be sure of is that they definitely have "man strength" as opposed to people from other continents who, for some unknown reason, seemingly all possess regular strength. Due to British boxing promoters' apparent obsession with recycling opponents, there may even be a chance that the African challenger "has been on these shores before" and although his best years are likely behind him, it would never be suggested that he'll provide anything less than a "stern test."
A South American challenger, particularly from Argentina, may have provided a more fan friendly match up, with his inevitable "wild" style and "raw" boxing skills making for a dangerous fight for however long it would last. The wild west that is South American boxing ensures that "we don't know much about him", however commentators, pundits and promoters alike will be glad to learn that the "heavy handed, dangerous puncher" is in fact absolutely sh!te.
A complete contrast, of course, to his Mexican friends, who "we know what we are going to get" from. That is, obviously, a fight. Because they are all tough and they all come to fight. Every single Mexican opponent comes to fight. This is an undisputed fact of British boxing. The only way you'll ever get rid of a Mexican early is if they are a veteran. Even then, they'll be bringing a respectable record with wins over a couple of recognised names, these wins, however, "were down at *insert weight class 2 below the one the fight is taking place at*."
With the WBO's tendency to rank obscure European fighters, there is a strong possibility that Saunders, Flanagan and Smith's futures will include a few "rugged" Eastern Europeans who, "despite what their records suggest" have a collective "solid look about them" and even if they don't pose anything resembling a threat, the least they will do is "earn their money". Fun fact: did you know "he's never been stopped"? Or, if he has, he has certainly "never been stopped like that!" What a statement, ey.
A relatively soft defence, even for the British commentators, would obviously be an Italian. Whilst they may start off looking like a "slick, slippery operator", the outmatched challenger will inevitably have his heart called into question the minute they start receiving a beating from their far superior opponent.![]()
![]()
![]()
I think any fighter from a country that the commentators know little about will be described as 'tough'.... including Korea, Japan, Philippines, Hawaii, the Faroe islands (ok maybe not!)....
I prefer Nigel Benn's summary of weak journeyman as being 'Mexican road sweepers' although these days maybe Latvian road sweepers might be more appropriate....
Re: British Boxing Clichés
PredatorHayds wrote:This thread could be the first 4 chapters of Nick Hallings memoirs.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
WIll be the next Champ of the world. A year later they are worse than terrible.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5458
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Needs to be read (growled) in Adam Smith's voice
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3164
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: British Boxing Clichés
I read that in Watt's voice unprompted!reggaereggae wrote:But he's hard to beat, no question.
“Not many give Bill a chance in this one, but I was talking to Ben yesterday, and he feels that Bill could just surprise a few people.”
Cue Weed launching Bill into the pots.
(Rawling's voice.)
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Carl Froch describing Callum Johnson's Namibian opponent Willbeforce Shihepo as "rugged" and comparing him to fellow African Charles Adamu about 3 times in the first round is just classic British commentary. 
Re: British Boxing Clichés
Round 2 and his physicality has been noted, along with a comparison to another African, this time Sakio Bika. Great stuff.
Re: British Boxing Clichés
I did my review of the Catley vs Beyer thread on Horses 52 week challenge.
I was choking to put a comment in about him "trying to nick rounds with his typically efficient German style" but I think I managed to stop just short of that particular racial stereotype
I regularly watch fights and find myself agreeing with commentators, thinking and talking in their dull cliches and stereotypes and growing to hate myself more and more with every passing round
I was choking to put a comment in about him "trying to nick rounds with his typically efficient German style" but I think I managed to stop just short of that particular racial stereotype
I regularly watch fights and find myself agreeing with commentators, thinking and talking in their dull cliches and stereotypes and growing to hate myself more and more with every passing round