Enzo's next fight, why bother

Lefthookhappy19 · Post by **Lefthookhappy19** » 18 Jun 2004, 19:35

Enzo Macarinelli's next fight is pathetic, even by Sports Networks standards. He's fighting Carlos Cruzat, a 35 year old former middleweight who didn't even fight in 2003. The guy has been dropped and stopped on numerous times in his career. He's also 5'9 while Enzo's 6'4. This fight is an absolute embarressment. It has to be one of the most pathetic fights ive ever seen made anywhere. It makes no sense at all. Its almost guaranteed to end in the first or second round. What the fornicate is going on?

Matchfixer · Post by **Matchfixer** » 18 Jun 2004, 19:39

Is he the original opponent?

Lefthookhappy19 · Post by **Lefthookhappy19** » 18 Jun 2004, 20:10

I assume he is, its been scheduled for a while now.

buzz · Post by **buzz** » 18 Jun 2004, 20:54

Neri · Post by **Neri** » 18 Jun 2004, 22:16

Sports Network seem to be famous more for their mismatches than anything else lately

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 19 Jun 2004, 04:40

SN are allowed to get away with it, because the bbboc let them.

Any promoter will make these sort of matches if they can get away with it, shame on the board I say.

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 19 Jun 2004, 06:48

Twinkle Toes wrote:SN are allowed to get away with it, because the bbboc let them.

Mismatches have always happened in boxing, nothing new really. SN are allowed to get away with but it's SKY you should vent your spleen at, not the BBBC.

This is a shocking matchup, as the original poster said, why bother? What is the point in this 'fight'?

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 19 Jun 2004, 07:47

Nah, I don't fully agree Goz. The bboc are there to veto fighters, and matches. They are supposed to be here for the integrity of boxing as a sport.

They fail imo.

SKY are also at fault, and I have posted numerous times saying just that, but my point is the bbboc also have a lot to answer for.

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 19 Jun 2004, 08:00

Twinkle Toes wrote:Nah, I don't fully agree Goz. The bboc are there to veto fighters, and matches. They are supposed to be here for the integrity of boxing as a sport.

They fail imo.

SKY are also at fault, and I have posted numerous times saying just that, but my point is the bbboc also have a lot to answer for.

Fair enough.

Or hairy muff as we say in work.

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 19 Jun 2004, 08:02

Enzo will learn nothing in this fight, it looks a poor match-up.

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 19 Jun 2004, 08:04

Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 19 Jun 2004, 08:05

Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz

Well Mr Calzaghe his compatriot has been getting plenty I guess.....

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 19 Jun 2004, 11:08

Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz

Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 19 Jun 2004, 11:17

richter-scale wrote:
Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit

i will tell him you said that

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 19 Jun 2004, 11:23

REAL_DEAL wrote:
richter-scale wrote:
Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit
i will tell him you said that

He can be my first defence of the boxrec title when i'v ended deals (career)!!!