Bernard Taylor

Post Reply
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

He was more suited for amateurs. Very slick fighter, not much power. He arguably beat Pedroza in that draw. I don't know much about his personal life. He could have burned out after so many amateur fights, but his desire to be a great pro never really seemed to be there. McGuigan kicked his ass.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by Ezzard »

He just wilted against McGuigan. Barry couldn't get to him in the early rounds but the body attack just took all the fight out of him.

He was quick and slick. He was rated in KO magazines top 12 p4p fighters when he fought McGuigan.

He's one of those top contenders who, whilst not great, you have to be a bit tasty to be able to beat.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by bennie »

Great boxer, great amateur but lack of power let him down over the 15-round distances. In today's 12-round game he would have won a world title.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by Counter-puncher »

was going to say, shades of Howard Davis jr
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17062
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by Seamus »

He was ahead of McGuigan when the fight ended, but he suffered some damage to his ribs.

Never duplicated his amateur success in the pros, but did turn in some decent performances. Perhaps like Johnny Bumphus he had too many amateur fights.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7173
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Bernard Taylor

Post by Nile4000 »

Very talented fighter who was one of the fastest fighters in the world at one point.However, he never did fight the other top contenders of his time, i.e LaPorte and Jackie Beard, and in the end, suffered because of it.
Post Reply