Who would win?

Post Reply

Who would win?

Graziano
4
17%
LaMotta
18
78%
The Morgue
1
4%
 
Total votes: 23

Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Who would win?

Post by Crease »

Who you got in a brawl between these two great sluggers...

Rocky Graziano vs Jake LaMotta

Image
Last edited by Crease on 21 Aug 2010, 22:02, edited 1 time in total.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17062
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Who would win?

Post by Seamus »

LaMotta every time. Graziano might rearrange Jake's face, but he wouldn't be able to finish him, and after he whethered the storm he'd put Graziano away in the late rounds.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Who would win?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

LaMotta was in a different league, Graziano was Gatti like for his day. Very exciting and beloved, but not elite. Though he was better than Arturo.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Who would win?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:LaMotta was in a different league, Graziano was Gatti like for his day. Very exciting and beloved, but not elite. Though he was better than Arturo.
Graziano was better than that. I'd like to see Gatti beat a Jr. Welter on Zale's level. Not likely. Better than Gatti, unquestionably. Better than LaMotta? Not a chance. Size disparity seals the deal, though Graziano goes down swinging.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9010
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Who would win?

Post by Syntax Error »

LaMotta for me too.

It would have been one hell of a fight, but LaMotta is one of the toughest men ever to don a pair of boxing gloves.

He'd have gone to hell & back against Graziano, but he would have toughed it out to come back & stop him.
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Who would win?

Post by Ambling Alp »

Would be an exciting fight, but LaMotta would win within 10 rounds. His chin would be the big difference.

It's funny about Graziano. For a long time he seemed to be regarded as one of the great middleweights. You almost never heard anyone mention Zale without mentioning Graziano. However, in the last 10 years or so you rarely hear about him and when you do it's not usually people praising him.
enrique
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1118
Joined: 25 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Who would win?

Post by enrique »

Jake and Rocky went to reform school together. One of their bios tells how the best lunch table -the one with shade- was controlled by blacks, who were the largest ethnic group there. After a confrontation it became Jake and Rocky's table.
yiddle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 117
Joined: 24 Apr 2009, 14:45

Re: Who would win?

Post by yiddle »

yeah it would be a great fight but i would go with la motta ,for me the better chin wins
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Who would win?

Post by Crease »

Ambling Alp wrote:It's funny about Graziano. For a long time he seemed to be regarded as one of the great middleweights. You almost never heard anyone mention Zale without mentioning Graziano. However, in the last 10 years or so you rarely hear about him and when you do it's not usually people praising him.
An excellent point. :TU:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Who would win?

Post by Crease »

I'm going with Graziano on this one... :box:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Who would win?

Post by Crease »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Graziano was Gatti like for his day. Very exciting and beloved, but not elite. Though he was better than Arturo.
I have to disagree, Graziano was a better fighter than Gatti and shouldn't be compared to him. :shame:
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Who would win?

Post by dempseyfire »

Graziano was far from a great fighter, he had a free-swinging style, big-time power, and balls of steel which made him very popular in the NE circuit but his management protected him at all costs and padded his record big time. His one notable W is vs an aging post WWII Zale in their 2nd fight and Tony completly outclassed him in the rubber match in one of the worst massacres in middleweight history.

LaMotta by a clear decision.

But yes of course he was better than Gatti, who never beat one fighter even close to being great.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Who would win?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Crease wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Graziano was Gatti like for his day. Very exciting and beloved, but not elite. Though he was better than Arturo.
I have to disagree, Graziano was a better fighter than Gatti and shouldn't be compared to him. :shame:

Did you read what I wrote? Don't you see me saying he was better than Gatti? It's a very valid comparison in that his talent didn't measure up to his popularity.
Post Reply