Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Yes
30
20%
No
114
78%
Don't know
3
2%
 
Total votes: 147

fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by fasteddie »

100% NO
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Chambers2 »

No that's why Froch is trying to sell the bollox out of the fight with all this fake aggro business. Froch has fought the best in the world and none of them hjave wound him up, now all of a sudden Groves is supposed to have annoyed the shit out of him. Froch is my fave fighter of all time, but I've found this build up irritating at best
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by dbf »

Hopefully in the next 5 years we get in situation where streaming becomes to the TV what napster and illegal downloading did the music industry and things tip in balance of the consumer.

Could you imagine, free boxing live on youtube, and the promoter only making money from the live event?
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by rossij8 »

Eddie has now announced Martin Murray on the bill (v TBC) due to his fight being called off in Aus

Twitter is full of people complementing the large card on the 23rd

Quality not quantity I reckon - though Murray being added is a welcome addition
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by The_Don1 »

rossij8 wrote:Eddie has now announced Martin Murray on the bill (v TBC) due to his fight being called off in Aus

Twitter is full of people complementing the large card on the 23rd

Quality not quantity I reckon - though Murray being added is a welcome addition
it depends who you follow on twitter, my TL is full of people commenting on the poor quality of the undercard.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by rossij8 »

The_Don1 wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Eddie has now announced Martin Murray on the bill (v TBC) due to his fight being called off in Aus

Twitter is full of people complementing the large card on the 23rd

Quality not quantity I reckon - though Murray being added is a welcome addition
it depends who you follow on twitter, my TL is full of people commenting on the poor quality of the undercard.
I see Buncey on Twitter has been backing it up as a PPV -he says the undercard is irrelevant for PPV

He also said all Froch's fights should be PPV
David McAllister
Super Middleweight
Posts: 445
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by David McAllister »

expe wrote:100% no, the undercard is Gethin-Crolla, Fielding against some Guyanan and Quigg is defending against Diego Oscar Silva - http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer, which is an absolute shocker of a defence, even Calzaghe usually fought against better than that.
I have to disagree mate, the kid has only been beat twice. Don't you remember Calzaghe vs Tocker Pudwill!!!! that was a joke defence!!!!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by expe »

David McAllister wrote:
expe wrote:100% no, the undercard is Gethin-Crolla, Fielding against some Guyanan and Quigg is defending against Diego Oscar Silva - http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer, which is an absolute shocker of a defence, even Calzaghe usually fought against better than that.
I have to disagree mate, the kid has only been beat twice. Don't you remember Calzaghe vs Tocker Pudwill!!!! that was a joke defence!!!!
Scroll down the page a bit further and see who he's fought. His last fight was against with a record of 22-7-1, has never beaten anyone decent, was knocked out in 65 seconds by Gamboa in his 5th fight and he couldn't beat him. This is just as bad as Pudwill.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Adamj1987 »

expe wrote:
David McAllister wrote:
expe wrote:100% no, the undercard is Gethin-Crolla, Fielding against some Guyanan and Quigg is defending against Diego Oscar Silva - http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer, which is an absolute shocker of a defence, even Calzaghe usually fought against better than that.
I have to disagree mate, the kid has only been beat twice. Don't you remember Calzaghe vs Tocker Pudwill!!!! that was a joke defence!!!!
Scroll down the page a bit further and see who he's fought. His last fight was against with a record of 22-7-1, has never beaten anyone decent, was knocked out in 65 seconds by Gamboa in his 5th fight and he couldn't beat him. This is just as bad as Pudwill.
its to make quigg look good on a big event after his last fight
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
IRLangmaid25 wrote:But when you have Scott Quigg in a World title fight,
His opponent is ranked 85th in the world. The fight is absolute garbage.

Always like your direct and no nonsense manner :TU: Quigg is a good boxer and could deal with far better fighters in an exciting way.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:Always like your direct and no nonsense manner :TU: Quigg is a good boxer and could deal with far better fighters in an exciting way.
:TU:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by lefty »

Anyone else noticed that Eddie always brings in these shitty south american opponents? I bet they're dirt cheap.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1172
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by rio »

Hearn said the only way froch v groves would be ppv would be with a mega undercard. When does the rest get announced then?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:Anyone else noticed that Eddie always brings in these shitty south american opponents? I bet they're dirt cheap.
Like Warren used to be with the Ghanaians, they'd be brought over with a reputation of being 'teak tough' and had nice looking records, but were quite frankly shite, the only difference is if the South Americans aren't unbeaten, they're likely to have been stopped, so instead they 'always come to win'.
Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

It's the same Matchroom fighters we get to see every other week in complete mismatches on Sky Sports through our normal susbscription... only in this case Hearn has through more of them on, Quantity over Quality to 'sell' a PPV, just throwing more sh1t on the fire..the chief support fight is an absolute joke of a mismatch for a 'world title' defence but i suppose Quigg is coming off a majority draw and said he would only call himself a world champion in the ring..which he later backtracked on cos in his opinion, he 'won' the fight... so has to look good...Martin Murray falls into Hearn's lap and is put on this show but cant see his opponent at this short notice being up to much...

I wont be buying it, as intriguing a match-up Froch v Groves has the potential to be, conceivably Froch walks right through Groves and does a Lucian Bute on him...Hearn will be hoping for his sake this fight becomes as competitive as he hopes it to be..with of course his favourite fighter emerging victorious
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by rossij8 »

Fergz16COTJ wrote:It's the same Matchroom fighters we get to see every other week in complete mismatches on Sky Sports through our normal susbscription... only in this case Hearn has through more of them on, Quantity over Quality to 'sell' a PPV, just throwing more sh1t on the fire..the chief support fight is an absolute joke of a mismatch for a 'world title' defence but i suppose Quigg is coming off a majority draw and said he would only call himself a world champion in the ring..which he later backtracked on cos in his opinion, he 'won' the fight... so has to look good...Martin Murray falls into Hearn's lap and is put on this show but cant see his opponent at this short notice being up to much...

I wont be buying it, as intriguing a match-up Froch v Groves has the potential to be, conceivably Froch walks right through Groves and does a Lucian Bute on him...Hearn will be hoping for his sake this fight becomes as competitive as he hopes it to be..with of course his favourite fighter emerging victorious
Nail on the head

Scott Quigg is defending a world title against a 85th in the world ranked fighter - how does that work?
Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

rossij8 wrote:
Fergz16COTJ wrote:It's the same Matchroom fighters we get to see every other week in complete mismatches on Sky Sports through our normal susbscription... only in this case Hearn has through more of them on, Quantity over Quality to 'sell' a PPV, just throwing more sh1t on the fire..the chief support fight is an absolute joke of a mismatch for a 'world title' defence but i suppose Quigg is coming off a majority draw and said he would only call himself a world champion in the ring..which he later backtracked on cos in his opinion, he 'won' the fight... so has to look good...Martin Murray falls into Hearn's lap and is put on this show but cant see his opponent at this short notice being up to much...

I wont be buying it, as intriguing a match-up Froch v Groves has the potential to be, conceivably Froch walks right through Groves and does a Lucian Bute on him...Hearn will be hoping for his sake this fight becomes as competitive as he hopes it to be..with of course his favourite fighter emerging victorious
Nail on the head

Scott Quigg is defending a world title against a 85th in the world ranked fighter - how does that work?
He's 86th now when i checked today :lol: - It's a voluntary 'defence' of a strap which he was awarded in the boardroom and subsequently failed to win in the ring against 86th ranked, number 3 Super-Bantam in Argentina, the bout is still subject to commission approval, but i am shocked this is deemed a suitable opponent for a 'world title'
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by expe »

Despite this being a shocker of a PPV show, Eddie has been retweeting numerous people who are saying it's the best show in ages, brilliant and all kinds of other bollocks, I genuinely wonder if these people possess any brain cells.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:Despite this being a shocker of a PPV show, Eddie has been retweeting numerous people who are saying it's the best show in ages, brilliant and all kinds of other bollocks, I genuinely wonder if these people possess any brain cells.
:lol:
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by jessi »

IMO yes, it's one of our best super middles ever fighting the up and coming star, if it sells out in 11 minutes it's worthy of ppv
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by expe »

jessi wrote:IMO yes, it's one of our best super middles ever fighting the up and coming star, if it sells out in 11 minutes it's worthy of ppv
It didn't sell out in 11 minutes though. Thousands were kept back for the undercard fighters and Froch and Groves were given large allocations as well. Of those sold, most will have gone to touts, for 3£700 or so you can buy a program that repeatedly applies for and buys tickets.
AdamThackray81
Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 10:38

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by AdamThackray81 »

Hi! New to boxrec! Felt compelled to join as I think it's a fornicating disgrace that this is PPV! Complete smoke and mirrors from that smug grinning tosser Hearn! Long list of fighters ppl recognise so they think its a brilliant card, the reality will become apparent on the night when there sitting through boring none competitive fights!
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by Final round »

The poll results are looking pretty damning..
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by jessi »

Final round wrote:The poll results are looking pretty damning..
Yes true, but the question is out of the 78% of people who think it shouldn't be ppv how many will still buy it ?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Is Froch vs Groves worthy of PPV

Post by palooka »

jessi wrote:
Final round wrote:The poll results are looking pretty damning..
Yes true, but the question is out of the 78% of people who think it shouldn't be ppv how many will still buy it ?
Most, like voting in an election really - it shouldn't be a PPV but will be a decent enough bout; I thought the PPV model was for the Rolls Royce type bouts.
Post Reply