Groves loses case against Booth

TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Groves loses case against Booth

Post by TopGun »

TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by TopGun »

Booth will watch the fight a week on sat thinking this is the best bit of cash he has ever earned. Always comes down to money, shame Booth couldn't just let Groves go and wish him all the best for the fight.
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by TopGun »

I'm seriously peed off about this as I fancied Groves causing a big upset but this is bound to affect his preparations. Balls!

Booth must be loaded.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by The Insider »

Has this been heard in court or just in front of the Southern Area Council? Not sure what the Board decide will have any bearing on who actually gets what.
80/20
Super Middleweight
Posts: 400
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 14:54

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by 80/20 »

I would assume that the matter is more of a legal one than the board ....however what will the board make of the situation when booth appears in the corner come fight night ...... :roll:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by tear up »

Nasty
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by sweetscience »

Still think its bollocks

And what is that tripe about early PPV figures

NO ONE I repeat NO ONE buys a PPV 2 week in advance ... Is it even possible ?
dazzer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 17:07

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by dazzer »

Will groves, now pull out of the fight?????
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by lefty »

I dont know what the issue is really. Booth was Groves's manager when this fight was arranged so surely he deserves his 25%? I imagine he played a big part in the negotiations and the final amount Groves got offered for the bout.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

sweetscience wrote:Still think its bollocks

And what is that tripe about early PPV figures

NO ONE I repeat NO ONE buys a PPV 2 week in advance ... Is it even possible ?
It is. Sky are hammering the promotion here. I don't even think Haye-Fury had this much.
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by spudder56 »

columbo wrote:I dont know what the issue is really. Booth was Groves's manager when this fight was arranged so surely he deserves his 25%? I imagine he played a big part in the negotiations and the final amount Groves got offered for the bout.
X2 you will probably find that the southern area just enforced the boxer/manager contract which both parties signed so personally I don't see what the issue is coz board contracts are there to protect the interests of both parties and it is not easy to walk away from a board contract
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by Parson Cross »

Now that the Board has adjudicated either party has the right to pursue a civil action.
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by spudder56 »

Parson Cross wrote:Now that the Board has adjudicated either party has the right to pursue a civil action.

Yes they could go down that route but first they can appeal to the board stewards of appeal and not pre empting the outcome will almost certainly back the decision of the southern area council unless groves can prove that booth has failed in his duties as a manager
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Would anyone be surprised if this all turned out to be a work ?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by palooka »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Would anyone be surprised if this all turned out to be a work ?
It would be a very organised and elaborate work and for them to even attempt it would mean that they really thought Froch was susceptible to games etc, all this takes a lot of effort so they'd have to be sure that it'd have a pay off.

There's been a few posters here that have said that they gave Groves a good chance before the split and without Booth - no chance; if it were a work maybe they imagine Froch would skimp a little in training though with McCracken I don't think that would happen.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by whiskey »

Image
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by palooka »

G0mez wrote:Image
Has Booth got a dagger in his hand?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by whiskey »

mickey1975 wrote:Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
Yes Mickey, as well as Darren Barker, Kelvin Young and Callum Smith - plus others here and there.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

G0mez wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
Yes Mickey, as well as Darren Barker, Kelvin Young and Callum Smith - plus others here and there.
I have mutual friends with Luke. Good work for him. Really tough lad, apparently, only young as well. I think he would have given smith a test.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

palooka wrote:
G0mez wrote:Image
Has Booth got a dagger in his hand?
He's got a snaggle tooth just like yours, palooka.
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Fcuks sake Booth you slimmy pudendum - couldn't this shite have waited Untill after the fight
DMMA
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 61
Joined: 12 Jan 2012, 08:04

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by DMMA »

Manchester Hitman wrote:Fcuks sake Booth you slimmy pudendum - couldn't this shite have waited Untill after the fight
Why should he? If he still has legit management contract/role in place then he's due his cut. Why wait until later and maybe risk losing it. Could also be a way of getting in early and levering Groves and any representatives in to playing ball rather than risk a drag on the preparations?
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by The Insider »

spudder56 wrote: board contracts are there to protect the interests of both parties and it is not easy to walk away from a board contract
Board contracts look like they are a piece if piss to walk away from of late if you've got the right bloke in your corner (ala rumpole etc). Now walking away without paying is another thing.....
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Groves loses case against Booth

Post by whiskey »

I know Booth divides people's thoughts on forums.

But looking at this black and white, the guy has been there throughout all of the poor opponents that probably had poor purses too - and now GG is having the the "big PPV fight" he gets dropped ?

He drove him around the UK for sparring, all the press conferences and training hours and the title fight is the kickback where you make your money back. I'm sure other trainers understand this and hence the contract to protect all parties.
Post Reply