maxi hughes v joe murray

maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

Fights made for September by dave coldwell. Very good fight for an 8 rounder who u picking.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by pyenest77 »

I take it that is on the Sheffield bill? I probably lean to Joe Murray who for me has underachieved big time. Maxi has a high workrate but doesnt hit hard enough to hurt anyone.
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by daviddee »

Joe Murray wide points. Although will be wanting maxi to win. I'm guessing will be at lightweight or at 9 stone 6/7
ringtoneboxing
Super Middleweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 07:24

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by ringtoneboxing »

Maxi moved down to super-feather when he moved to Wales to train with Lockett, after the Cardle defeat.

Would be nice if there could be a title on the line for Maxi to win.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

What weight ? Joe Murray looked quite big last sighted.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:What weight ? Joe Murray looked quite big last sighted.

Super feather
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

Fights off Queensbury hav pulled joe murray out of the fight dave coldwell fuming on twitter
ringtoneboxing
Super Middleweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 07:24

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by ringtoneboxing »

I was reading it on twitter last night too. Feel gutted for Maxi, he's having a torrid time getting opponents to stick recently.

From what I gathered, it all boils down to Frank not wanting the fight shown on Matchroom's new fight pass thing. Still seems childish to me, the guy has been around boxing for so many years you'd think by now he'd realise this sort of behaviour is doing the sport no good.

I just don't understand why he wants to alienate virtually everybody in boxing that isn't part of HIS organisation.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by ste1983 »

this tit for tat between Matchroom and Warren will only continue and it'll be us fans that lose out. This one seems very petty but its not always Warren to blame.

Lets not forget this all started with Sky and their decision to go exclusively with Matchroom. Eddie poaching fighters also hasn't helped.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Murray is tied to allegedly, so why would he fight on a card that is probably going to be shown on Matchroom fight pass ? Doesnt really make much sense to provide the opposition with fighters if there's no title at stake. Hopefully Caldwell isnt so naive to think otherwise ?
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by rio »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Murray is tied to allegedly, so why would he fight on a card that is probably going to be shown on Matchroom fight pass ? Doesnt really make much sense to provide the opposition with fighters if there's no title at stake. Hopefully Caldwell isnt so naive to think otherwise ?
When the last time warren got him a fight then?? Hate promters who do stuff like this to fighters......unless warren has anothrr fight scheduled for murray hes a disgrace.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

rio wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Murray is tied to allegedly, so why would he fight on a card that is probably going to be shown on Matchroom fight pass ? Doesnt really make much sense to provide the opposition with fighters if there's no title at stake. Hopefully Caldwell isnt so naive to think otherwise ?
When the last time warren got him a fight then?? Hate promters who do stuff like this to fighters......unless warren has anothrr fight scheduled for murray hes a disgrace.

Tbf to.warren I heard murray had pulled out of 2 fights with craig evans tho I think its wrong decision that they have made regarding the maxi fight. Which imo was very winnable and cud hav pushed him closer to an eliminator or title shot
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by daviddee »

maley1984 wrote:
rio wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Murray is tied to allegedly, so why would he fight on a card that is probably going to be shown on Matchroom fight pass ? Doesnt really make much sense to provide the opposition with fighters if there's no title at stake. Hopefully Caldwell isnt so naive to think otherwise ?
When the last time warren got him a fight then?? Hate promters who do stuff like this to fighters......unless warren has anothrr fight scheduled for murray hes a disgrace.

Tbf to.warren I heard murray had pulled out of 2 fights with craig evans tho I think its wrong decision that they have made regarding the maxi fight. Which imo was very winnable and cud hav pushed him closer to an eliminator or title shot
I'm quite shocked although I quite like Maxi and his attitude Joe would of won this fight wide points.. I think he will just be as devastated as Maxi
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by expe »

rio wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Murray is tied to allegedly, so why would he fight on a card that is probably going to be shown on Matchroom fight pass ? Doesnt really make much sense to provide the opposition with fighters if there's no title at stake. Hopefully Caldwell isnt so naive to think otherwise ?
When the last time warren got him a fight then?? Hate promters who do stuff like this to fighters......unless warren has anothrr fight scheduled for murray hes a disgrace.
Frank will probably stick him on one of his shows, possibly the undercard of Paul Butler's next fight when they get that confirmed.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Parson Cross »

If the roles were reversed what would Eddie have done ?
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by rio »

Parson Cross wrote:If the roles were reversed what would Eddie have done ?
Let him fight If I had to put money on it.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Parson Cross »

You seriously think Eddie would co operate with Wazza ?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23191
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by mickey1975 »

Parsons is only been logical, he knows Dave and isn't pally with Fwank.
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by whiteboy »

Parson Cross wrote:You seriously think Eddie would co operate with Wazza ?
after agreeing to let one of his fringe fighters fight an 8-rounder away from home on a non-tv show, pulling them off because allegedly screened it?

you would hope so
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Has a Matchroom fighter ever fought on allegedly show, outside of a fight where Matchroom has lost the purse bids. Answer is no, and this tell you all you need to know on this subject.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by Parson Cross »

:TU:
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Has a Matchroom fighter ever fought on allegedly show, outside of a fight where Matchroom has lost the purse bids. Answer is no, and this tell you all you need to know on this subject.

John ryder?
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by ste1983 »

maley1984 wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Has a Matchroom fighter ever fought on allegedly show, outside of a fight where Matchroom has lost the purse bids. Answer is no, and this tell you all you need to know on this subject.

John ryder?
Matchroom lost the purse bids for the Ryder / Saunders fight mate
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by maley1984 »

ste1983 wrote:
maley1984 wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Has a Matchroom fighter ever fought on allegedly show, outside of a fight where Matchroom has lost the purse bids. Answer is no, and this tell you all you need to know on this subject.

John ryder?
Matchroom lost the purse bids for the Ryder / Saunders fight mate
Miss read wat he put school boy error lol
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: maxi hughes v joe murray

Post by rio »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Has a Matchroom fighter ever fought on allegedly show, outside of a fight where Matchroom has lost the purse bids. Answer is no, and this tell you all you need to know on this subject.
Diffrence is as hearn actually gets his guys fight so there is no need for them to fight on warrens shows. That's why the majority of fighters left warren.....they actually wanted to fight, eddie guarentees that.
Post Reply