SKY PPV financial question???

Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32993
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: SKY PPV financial question???

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Superheavy wrote:Here's a question: why did Sky stop doing PPV after the Haye v Harrison debacle? I suspect the decision was driven by credibility issues rather than financial. That being the case, it's odd that they would go down the PPV route for a domestic card that would typically be on Fight Night.
They didn't - Haye vs Klitschko was on PPV as well. In reality, PPV wasn't gone very long - it just took a short holiday until Froch started building a proper fanbase.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: SKY PPV financial question???

Post by whiskey »

There will have been 2no PPV's this year.

I forecast both will set new Sky records.

1) All time most sales

2) All time least sales

I'm sure they can deduce that a great fight will always do ten times the sales, than ten times the 'names' but no great fight.
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: SKY PPV financial question???

Post by WelshJack »

G0mez wrote:There will have been 2no PPV's this year.

I forecast both will set new Sky records.

1) All time most sales

2) All time least sales

I'm sure they can deduce that a great fight will always do ten times the sales, than ten times the 'names' but no great fight.
I don't think this will do too bad, the names will appeal to people and the main event will get people interested.
Post Reply