Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post Reply
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by johnswan1 »

What legendary (i.e. HOF bound, arguably HOF bound or long time champions) fighters that are still active to you perceive to be no longer relevant in boxing? By no longer relevant I mean they are universally considered past their best or on the verge of getting old overnight and any fighter who beats them now will get comparatively little credit. I'll start:

Jones Jr
Tarver (although I never considered him HOF)
Hopkins
Marquez
Taylor (if he gets out of jail)
Abraham
Sturm

Cotto will also be on that list after the Canelo fight.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by palooka »

Nonito Donaire?

(Cotto will beat Canelo, the ginger doesn't like body shots and Miguel will hit him plenty).
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17425
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Sturm is legendary?
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by Lackeos »

johnswan1 wrote:What legendary (i.e. HOF bound, arguably HOF bound or long time champions) fighters that are still active to you perceive to be no longer relevant in boxing? By no longer relevant I mean they are universally considered past their best or on the verge of getting old overnight and any fighter who beats them now will get comparatively little credit. I'll start:

Jones Jr
Tarver (although I never considered him HOF)
Hopkins
Marquez
Taylor (if he gets out of jail)
Abraham
Sturm

Cotto will also be on that list after the Canelo fight.
Tarver is potentially not far from another title shot. Hopkins was still top 3 right up until the conclusion of his last fight. Marquez is not still fighting, he is recently retired. Taylor is not a legend, but he is a current world titlist. Abraham is also not a legend, but is a current world titlist. Sturm is not a legend, and he only narrowly lost a title fight in his last fight.

A list of active, irrelevant legends would be like... RJJ, James Toney, Glen Johnson, Acelino Freitas, Shane Mosley, Ricardo Mayorga up until a few days ago and to a lesser extent Vic Darchinyan. Not sure if Jose Luis Castillo has announced retirement, but he fought 10 months ago.
Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by Switch hitter »

Lackeos wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:What legendary (i.e. HOF bound, arguably HOF bound or long time champions) fighters that are still active to you perceive to be no longer relevant in boxing? By no longer relevant I mean they are universally considered past their best or on the verge of getting old overnight and any fighter who beats them now will get comparatively little credit. I'll start:

Jones Jr
Tarver (although I never considered him HOF)
Hopkins
Marquez
Taylor (if he gets out of jail)
Abraham
Sturm

Cotto will also be on that list after the Canelo fight.
Tarver is potentially not far from another title shot. Hopkins was still top 3 right up until the conclusion of his last fight. Marquez is not still fighting, he is recently retired. Taylor is not a legend, but he is a current world titlist. Abraham is also not a legend, but is a current world titlist. Sturm is not a legend, and he only narrowly lost a title fight in his last fight.

A list of active, irrelevant legends would be like... RJJ, James Toney, Glen Johnson, Acelino Freitas, Shane Mosley, Ricardo Mayorga up until a few days ago and to a lesser extent Vic Darchinyan. Not sure if Jose Luis Castillo has announced retirement, but he fought 10 months ago.
Johnson / Mayorga legends ??
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by johnswan1 »

Lads you are misunderstanding. Please reread the OP when I defined what I meant by "legend" for the purpose of this topic. All of the fighters listed meet the criteria I defined. If you don't like the word legend then use something else if that makes you feel better. This is not a debate over what a legend is because legend in respect of this topic has already been defined from the outset.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23087
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by handsofstone »

I'd say Hopkins,Marquez,Abraham and maybe even Tarver are still relevant today,long past their primes but still relevant IMO
Ade L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 600
Joined: 21 Aug 2009, 11:18

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by Ade L »

James Toney
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5335
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Legends still fighting who are no longer relevant

Post by greg »

Abraham?
...never a legend, but I still think you have to beat him...
Post Reply