Klitschko v Fury RBR

For RBR threads only
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Rexob »

CharlesListon wrote:We've paid 17 quid for this.

:lol:
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

What's he called? Sounds like 'Cat Lick' on the commentary!
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Sklar »

CharlesListon wrote:We've paid 17 quid for this.
I'm going to be listening on the radio but for you TV men the main event will make it worth it for you, I reckon.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22991
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by handsofstone »

Tlatlik not wanting the KO?
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1073
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by ScottDetonator »

This it after this fight? Finally, Fury and Klitschko in the same ring.

Let's get it on!
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I'm buzzing for the main event, although this undercard is doing its best to dampen my enthusiasm.
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

Rahimi is one tough dude.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Controversial »

I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Baboon »

Cracking fight this. Dont get me wrong, its a howler of an undercard, but this is a pleasant surprise.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

I wonder how long wlad will take to get to the ring? Fury would be Best doing his warm up in the ring cause it'll take at least 10 mins
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Baboon »

Looks like Rahimi has shot his bolt, sadly.
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Yes I think you need to already subscibe.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Neil Gee wrote:
Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Yes I think you need to already subscibe.
You never used to have to.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6565
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Kilburn »

Come on Tyson .
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by CharlesListon »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Neil Gee wrote:
Controversial wrote:I don't have Sky Sports, can I still pay for the fight or do you have to be a Sky Sports subscriber as well?
Yes I think you need to already subscibe.
You never used to have to.
You don't have to have skysports to buy the ppv
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Baboon »

Fvcking hell. What are Smith & McCrory rambling about the low blow for...the huge right after the ref called break completely fvcked the boy up. Dicks.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Controversial »

CharlesListon wrote:
You don't have to have skysports to buy the ppv
Correct just booked it and now watching, thanks
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

This is one tough night for Tlatlik. He's proving his mettle.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by stevedoc »

You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by skanksta »

Baboon wrote:Cracking fight this. Dont get me wrong, its a howler of an undercard, but this is a pleasant surprise.
x2
Shocking undercard, but c'mon Rahimi ! :box:
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by CharlesListon »

stevedoc wrote:You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
Exactly. It's been pants. What makes it worse is the commentary team pretending how great these bouts are. Like they think we're thick.
manchester-mexican
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by manchester-mexican »

CharlesListon wrote:
stevedoc wrote:You'd think that they would put at least one decent undercard fight on ,the purse for wlad and fury must be 5million another 150k would of got a couple of decent fights
Exactly. It's been pants. What makes it worse is the commentary team pretending how great these bouts are. Like they think we're thick.
we are paid 17 quid for it
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22991
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by handsofstone »

Thought the ref couldve gave Rahimi another standing count but still a decent fight
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Ezzard »

Stuck in Spain with no chance of seeing the fight. Any streams?
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Klitschko v Fury RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

handsofstone wrote:Thought the ref couldve gave Rahimi another standing count but still a decent fight
Definitely. You can't moan about that as an undercard fight on any card.
Post Reply