Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by boxing_rocks »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I watched it three more time's and Ward won each time after Kovalev knocked Ward down he threw the blue print out the window and thought he'd get the KO bad tactic's by Team Kovalev because he missed the boat :lol: ....................Ward and his trainer the better duo on the night in a close fight that the Krusher will rue the rest of his life. :box: All the credit must go to Team Ward. :TU:
Rewatched THREE more times??? Are you off your pills?
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

boxing_rocks wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I watched it three more time's and Ward won each time after Kovalev knocked Ward down he threw the blue print out the window and thought he'd get the KO bad tactic's by Team Kovalev because he missed the boat :lol: ....................Ward and his trainer the better duo on the night in a close fight that the Krusher will rue the rest of his life. :box: All the credit must go to Team Ward. :TU:
Rewatched THREE more times??? Are you off your pills?

I'm on holiday...........................I watched some of the fight in slow-motion great way to learn :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by Kalan »

You only need to watch the fight once to realize Kovalev was robbed blind... The 10th round tells the whole story... If the judges scored that clear Kovalev round for Kovalev they get the right winner... So they all gave it to Ward, keeping him in the fight.

In Kovalev's previous fight in Russia -- the Russian commission did not appoint a single Russian official... For the Ward fight the NSAC appointed 3 American judges and an American referee... That's when I posted that it would be a robbery... I knew Kovalev wasn't likely to KO Ward, who's a great boxer.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by Blodhemn »

Yeah, watching it live, I knew the score. After Kovalev clearly won the 10th, but the crowd cheered on Ward in salvage of it, I said the judges will score with the crowd, and ridiculously all 3 of them did. That is simply all it comes down to. Hometown decision.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by Enlightened-One »

jezzamundo wrote:Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?
There are very few fights that I choose to watch multiple times. I thoroughly enjoy watching the classics over-and-over again, such as Hearns-Hagler, but I don’t feel motivated to sit through another twelve rounds deeply analysing the Kovalev-Ward fight in order to gain evidence to strengthen some sort of theory.

The judges are only given the opportunity to watch fights once, from one particular angle and unlike us, they aren’t allowed to revise their scores armed with the benefit of hindsight, despite the criticism they often receive from fight fans.

So why should we unfairly try to undermine them by studiously scrutinising multiple slow motion replays covering the action from several viewpoints, performing a meticulous punch count and generally gathering evidence to support our claims?

The Kovalev-Ward fight was only mildly intriguing to watch first time around, it would be hideously tedious to view the same contest again, so I prefer to stick with my original perception when I watched the bout live.

This isn’t a criticism of you personally, it’s just my general opinion on performing a detailed autopsy of controversial bouts.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by squiggy »

Impractical Poster wrote:Ok. Watching it live, I had Kovalev winning. However, it was a little late and I had been drinking.

So, I am reading these guys on here saying that you must watch it with the commentary off to possibly see it Ward's way. So, I decided to shut off the lights, kick the family out of the house, draw the blinds, shut off my cell phone, and limit my blinking. Like magic, I had Ward winning that time.

Just today, I was thinking I need a Rubber Viewing to find out who the winner is once and for all. But this time I wanted to completely submerge myself into the fight. Luckily, I have a friend who runs the planetarium at a smallish university downtown. He is a boxing fan and enjoyed the idea of putting the fight on in the planetarium. So, we did. Instead of the commentary and crowd noise, we put on very relaxing meditation music. It was crazy. Every punch landed felt like it was landing on me. I almost couldn't take the first round. Then the second round came. Kovalev landed that vicious shot that sent Ward to the canvas, and it basically paralyzed me. It was too much with the meditation music and all. I stopped right there and decided to give Kovalev the victory by 2nd round KO.

2-1 viewings - Kovalev
I bet dropping acid a half hour beforehand would really open up the fight.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7255
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by Oiky »

Definitely warrants a rematch
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by man »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Supremo wrote:I watched it i British commentary and on American commentary. Americans place FAR too much importance and respect to compubox stats. Every round it was giving the stats- who cares? It's just a human being sitting making judgements in real time with their own eyes- you so that yourself whilst watching a fight anyway.
:TU: I despise compubox.
second that.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Who has re-watched Ward-Kovalev?

Post by boxing_rocks »

I bet if you watch it while standing on your head, you will have Ward winning.
Post Reply