Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Luckybattles »

Ok, thruman won, but I don't think anyone's stock really went up. Its was a snoozer on free tv and I doubt anyone is going to be clamoring for either of these 2 vs pacaman. For all the frenzy, Thurman could never really assert himself and Danny should have abandoned the counter punch game after the 4th round because it was ineffective. To much respect from both of these guys. Whatever happened to the methodical no fear style Julio Cesar Chavez and Felix Trinidad. These two would hardly crack the top ten 20 years ago.
DannyMCR
Super Lightweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by DannyMCR »

Angel wants Danny to retire :lol:
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by montrealsuper »

It looked like an in house choreograph with the intent to Maintain both fighters Marquee value - in other words it looked like a sparring session
Sequitorian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1766
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Sequitorian »

... bad win for Thurman ...

... good loss for Garcia ...

<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by ValMar »

It was a solid top level match. I has been rooting for Thurman, because his opponent had some gift decisions in the past, and his father/trainer is literally idiot. Personally, I think Thurman won 115-113.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Luckybattles »

montrealsuper wrote:It looked like an in house choreograph with the intent to Maintain both fighters Marquee value - in other words it looked like a sparring session

Yeah, most of the fighting was done at press conferences and most of the big blows were landed by Angel Garcia.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Tanzio »

Luckybattles wrote:
montrealsuper wrote:It looked like an in house choreograph with the intent to Maintain both fighters Marquee value - in other words it looked like a sparring session

Yeah, most of the fighting was done at press conferences and most of the big blows were landed by Angel Garcia.
If you want people to stand and trade lobby for phonebooth sized rings.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

It wasn't overly dramatic, but a solid enough fight with the correct winner.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Jip »

Luckybattles wrote:Ok, thruman won, but I don't think anyone's stock really went up. Its was a snoozer on free tv and I doubt anyone is going to be clamoring for either of these 2 vs pacaman. For all the frenzy, Thurman could never really assert himself and Danny should have abandoned the counter punch game after the 4th round because it was ineffective. To much respect from both of these guys. Whatever happened to the methodical no fear style Julio Cesar Chavez and Felix Trinidad. These two would hardly crack the top ten 20 years ago.
exactly. one with no footwork and the other a runner

danny didnt even try to ko keith when danny was feeling he was behind on cards.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Blodhemn »

Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Blodhemn wrote:Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
You missed the comedy of Leonard encouraging Thurman to run late with the lead.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Jip »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
You missed the comedy of Leonard encouraging Thurman to run late with the lead.

that realy happened? sugar realy did this :doh: it was a close fight, it didnt work for oscar, i think sugars advice couldve backfired prety bad
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Blodhemn »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
You missed the comedy of Leonard encouraging Thurman to run late with the lead.
Ha. Sounds exactly like what he'd say. Thurman lost me as a fan when he started the running bullshit all the while acting like he's about KO's. Terrible transparent promotional personality. His herky, jerky run style won't last much longer.
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Impractical Poster »

I thought it was a decent enough performance. I got a little irritated with Thurman in the last couple rounds. But, it's not as if he has made a career out of this type of fighting. Overall, I like Thurman, his style, and choice of opponents. He's good for the sport.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Jip wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
You missed the comedy of Leonard encouraging Thurman to run late with the lead.

that realy happened? sugar realy did this :doh: it was a close fight, it didnt work for oscar, i think sugars advice couldve backfired prety bad
It wasn't advice, it was commentary.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Kalan »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Didn't bother watching. Can't stand the styles nor personalities of either.
You missed the comedy of Leonard encouraging Thurman to run late with the lead.
Oscar was running against Trinidad.. Thurman was moving too much, but attacking in spurts. That's the only time he was effective, and it gave a disjointed look to the fight. Thurman was instructed to "box smart" by Birmingham because Dan thought he was well ahead.. That was terrible advice. On a par with Gil Clancy telling Oscar he had the Trinidad fight won and to stick and move.. Oscar was winning the fight the first 9 rounds so why change???

An aggressive fight was working extremely well for Thurman in the early rounds... If plan A is working well you stick with it all the way... If you want to get screwed by biased judges - start coasting in the late rounds.. It gives the fight a different look that's often interpreted as a change in momentum...

In contrast the Thurman-Porter fight was fought like a house on fire for 12 freakin' rounds -- because it was close all the way and needed to be.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by ldlamb »

I thought it was a decent enough fight.

It wasn't a brawl, of course....but there was quality action with hard punches being thrown by top technicians.

I thought it was close and the decision was about right. Good night of boxing for me.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Luckybattles »

funny how every fighter that refuses to let his hands go or assert himself is nowdays called a "technician." Yes they are not amateurs but these guys are not exactly Juan Manuel Marquez
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Impractical Poster »

Luckybattles wrote:funny how every fighter that refuses to let his hands go or assert himself is nowdays called a "technician." Yes they are not amateurs but these guys are not exactly Juan Manuel Marquez
I think they are in the same realm. They are both technicians. You don't accomplish what these two have without having a high level of proficiency.
Dart340
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 304
Joined: 01 Jan 2007, 18:55

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Dart340 »

montrealsuper wrote:It looked like an in house choreograph with the intent to Maintain both fighters Marquee value - in other words it looked like a sparring session
Exactly. No damage done. Didn't look anything like the classic Leonard-Hearns reunification fight they desperately were trying to compare it to. Two blocky guys who couldn't or wouldn't break through each others guard.

Totally devoid of suspense, action, or heart.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Luckybattles »

Impractical Poster wrote:
Luckybattles wrote:funny how every fighter that refuses to let his hands go or assert himself is nowdays called a "technician." Yes they are not amateurs but these guys are not exactly Juan Manuel Marquez
I think they are in the same realm. They are both technicians. You don't accomplish what these two have without having a high level of proficiency.

Although I wouldn't say either have bad technique, they are hardly technicians. Against top opposition, Thurman looks like one of those scrappy herky jerky fighters who hasn't learned to cut the ring off and relies heavily on wild right hands and wide hooks. Danny looks pretty solid technically but unable make any form of adjustment and didn't know how to mount any kind of attack. Most champs are better technically than Thruman and many are better than Danny.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Kalan »

Dart340 wrote:
montrealsuper wrote:It looked like an in house choreograph with the intent to Maintain both fighters Marquee value - in other words it looked like a sparring session
Exactly. No damage done. Didn't look anything like the classic Leonard-Hearns reunification fight they desperately were trying to compare it to. Two blocky guys who couldn't or wouldn't break through each others guard.

Totally devoid of suspense, action, or heart.
Total nonsense.. Both fighters move their heads very well and are much harder to nail with a clean punch on the chin than Hearns or Leonard... Hearns looked skinny, weak, and undernourished vs Leonard - like he was about to be blown away like dandelion fluff... Both were easy to hit and took a zillion punches... Leonard got way behind because he wasn’t doing anything in the middle rounds but getting punched in the face - “You’re blowing it son.” But Hears ran out of gas because he was too skinny and weak.

Mayweather is supposed to be the best boxer ever – but Thurman outboxed Guerrero by a 14-point wider aggregate margin on the scorecards than Floyd beat him. Plus he had RG down for a 9-count.. Thurman caught Garcia with a few big shots in the first 2 rounds.. He let Danny know he wasn’t playing.. The dumbest move for Keith was to boxing and moving in the late rounds. He should have kept attacking and kept the pressure on the whole way.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by Luckybattles »

So you are saying that these guys are par or better than SRL and Hearns? And using Robert Guererro as some kind of measuring tool. I saw Guerroro live a couple fights before that in los angeles against some unknown Asian fighter. Even before Thurman, Guererro was getting hit with absolutely everything. You couldn't miss the guy. Getting hit flush on the chin with everything. He was beyond shot when Thruman fought him.

Like many fighters of this era, these guys just don't want to get hit and just follow the same bs routine every round while hoping to catch the other one with a haymaker. Pathetic display. Made Santa Cruz vs Frampton look like FOTY. These guys blew their loads at the press conferences.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by ValMar »

ldlamb wrote:I thought it was a decent enough fight.

It wasn't a brawl, of course....but there was quality action with hard punches being thrown by top technicians.

I thought it was close and the decision was about right. Good night of boxing for me.
You are right ! :TU:
cletomex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 575
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 00:21

Re: Thruman vs Garcia Zzzzzzzzz

Post by cletomex »

I liked the fight. 7-5 Thurman. I loath Thurman, can't stand him. Errol Spence would be the shit out of him.
Post Reply