There's a lot wrong with what you've wrote there. I can only hope that is a result of bad English, rather than what you actually mean.asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin has had samples independently made and tested in Laussane, Switzerland (a WADA approved facility,just like the LA facility), and those results have come back clean.Rob3_142 wrote:asdfjkl wrote: "The tests given in an independent laboratory in Lausanne [Switzerland] are clean"
What part do you not understand? Did you actually read it at all?VADA wrote:The ‘B’ sample was opened earlier this week and VADA confirmed it also tested positive for ostarine, however Povetkin’s promoter, Andrey Ryabinsky, still proclaims his charge’s innocence.I did read it, but there's two conflicting statements. One from the testing body, VADA, and one from the promoter who's personally funded Povetkin's career. If it's all the same, I'll take the word of the former.Ryabinsky wrote:“An American laboratory confirmed ostarine was found in Povetkin’s ‘B’ sample. The tests given in an independent laboratory in Lausanne [Switzerland] are clean,”
The LA facility simply appearantly wasn't independent, that's the only difference... That's straight away the reason why the doping was found at such an odd moment.
Where do you really think we go from here? This lab said this, this lab said that, it's all anti-Russian rhetoric etc.