Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Of course this is just a test. In a real fight you can risk a serious injury or open too much for a counter when you're throwing a punch like that.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
In Rocky IV, Ivan Drago registered a 2,150lbs punch.
That being said, if you want to pretend that GGG punches harder than something truly impressive, then why don’t you claim that he’s heavier-handed than the latest movie version of King Kong or what about Megazord from the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers"? Let's have fun with this?
We don't have any proof that both men were involved in the same tests performed under precisely the same conditions. Your video simply claims that GGG punches like a cruiserweight. So this sentence has little to no meaning whatsoever.apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
That being said, if you want to pretend that GGG punches harder than something truly impressive, then why don’t you claim that he’s heavier-handed than the latest movie version of King Kong or what about Megazord from the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers"? Let's have fun with this?
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
You're very annoying! Get Horse and have a chat!Enlightened-One wrote:In Rocky IV, Ivan Drago registered a 2,150lbs punch.We don't have any proof that both men were involved in the same tests performed under precisely the same conditions. Your video simply claims that GGG punches like a cruiserweight. So this sentence has little to no meaning whatsoever.apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
That being said, if you want to pretend that GGG punches harder than something truly impressive, then why don’t you claim that he’s heavier-handed than the latest movie version of King Kong or what about Megazord from the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers"? Let's have fun with this?
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
OK, let’s keep things serious then, if that's what you want... you quoted the following statistic that strongly suggests that GGG hits 52% harder than a prime Frank Bruno:apollo creed wrote:You're very annoying! Get Horse and have a chat!Enlightened-One wrote:In Rocky IV, Ivan Drago registered a 2,150lbs punch.We don't have any proof that both men were involved in the same tests performed under precisely the same conditions. Your video simply claims that GGG punches like a cruiserweight. So this sentence has little to no meaning whatsoever.apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
That being said, if you want to pretend that GGG punches harder than something truly impressive, then why don’t you claim that he’s heavier-handed than the latest movie version of King Kong or what about Megazord from the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers"? Let's have fun with this?![]()
So why don’t you provide some evidence that justifies this belief, such as proving that both men were tested under identical conditions using the same instruments, with the tests performed by the same scientists?apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
If you can’t do something that basic, then all you’ve done is prove that you have a mild form of keyboard Tourette’s Syndrome that compels you to submit posts of a random nature.
You don't happen to pick random numbers for the UK's national lottery machine do you?
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Give it a rest my man.
Nice video apollo. I appreciated it.
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
I bet they could make me peeing sound totally awesome at the fight science
Still nice video and it is true that GGG hits like true beast
Still nice video and it is true that GGG hits like true beast
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Impractical Poster wrote:![]()
Enlightened One.... You really delight in being a prick. He's just highlighting that GGG hits like a freaking mule... and here comes Enlightened One... "Umm, if conditions were different and Jupiter was aligned with the constellation of Orion, then even I could punch harder than blah blah blah...."
Give it a rest my man.
Nice video apollo. I appreciated it.
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Is that Bruno's Jab?apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
I've been waiting for some time to see it released on internet. So , I gladly posted on this forum.Heretic wrote:I bet they could make me peeing sound totally awesome at the fight science![]()
Still nice video and it is true that GGG hits like true beast
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
No, it's Bruno's finger snapping.MachoTime wrote:Is that Bruno's Jab?apollo creed wrote:Frank Bruno - 1,420 lbs.
-
Thomastearns
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2403
- Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Still a lot of mystery about where knockout power comes from. Some seem to have it all along and some develop it in time. Emanuel Steward claimed that he taught Tommy Hearns how to use his leverage to start knocking people out after he turned pro. Apparently as an amateur his knockout rate was quite low.
Golovkin is a big puncher, but not an enormous puncher like say Pavlik who put dents in faces. Still GGG lands far more than poor robotic Kelly.
Still, no way GGG punches like Bruno, (another poor robot). I still remember hearing the punch he hit Jumbo Cummings with. I thought he'd killed him.
When it came to a single punch Bruno may have been hardest ever, even harder than Marciano's Suzie Q. He almost knocked out a prime Mike Tyson with a jab.
Golovkin is a big puncher, but not an enormous puncher like say Pavlik who put dents in faces. Still GGG lands far more than poor robotic Kelly.
Still, no way GGG punches like Bruno, (another poor robot). I still remember hearing the punch he hit Jumbo Cummings with. I thought he'd killed him.
When it came to a single punch Bruno may have been hardest ever, even harder than Marciano's Suzie Q. He almost knocked out a prime Mike Tyson with a jab.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
I wasn't criticising the video - I was mocking his random post about Frank Bruno that even he doesn't understand.Impractical Poster wrote:![]()
Enlightened One.... You really delight in being a prick. He's just highlighting that GGG hits like a freaking mule... and here comes Enlightened One... "Umm, if conditions were different and Jupiter was aligned with the constellation of Orion, then even I could punch harder than blah blah blah...."
Give it a rest my man.
Asking someone to explain the reason for posting a random meaningless statistic is not unreasonable. And if they respond with insults, because they can't explain their post, then they deserve to be mocked.
If you think I'm being unreasonable, why don't you ask apollo what his Frank Bruno statistic actually represents?
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
The true source of his power is the letter G.
And he's got three.
And he's got three.
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Machine don't hit back.
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Too bad GGG can't really land it in close quarters. Was surprising to see how much he missed with the wide punches in close. His uppercut works wonders there but those hooks just aren't landing, save for the body shots on occasion. He needs to go back to throwing those skull busters like against Rubio.
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Yea but modern boxing has changed a bit in my opinion. There is far less toe to toe so there's not as much opportunity for him to throw it. Instead, you tie someone up as soon as they get close. Well thats what I've seen a lot of lately. PPl that dont do it....and not to give him credit but this is why it would make a great fight is Canelo. Chavez also used to stand there and go toe to toe proper. Golovkin verses any of those is a good fight.Blodhemn wrote:Too bad GGG can't really land it in close quarters. Was surprising to see how much he missed with the wide punches in close. His uppercut works wonders there but those hooks just aren't landing, save for the body shots on occasion. He needs to go back to throwing those skull busters like against Rubio.
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
the guy is a beast and top 5 of the biggest punchers ever p4p. jj, valero, hearns, bailey, GGG. he is in that group.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
He was most likely siting this article...Enlightened-One wrote:I wasn't criticising the video - I was mocking his random post about Frank Bruno that even he doesn't understand.Impractical Poster wrote:![]()
Enlightened One.... You really delight in being a prick. He's just highlighting that GGG hits like a freaking mule... and here comes Enlightened One... "Umm, if conditions were different and Jupiter was aligned with the constellation of Orion, then even I could punch harder than blah blah blah...."
Give it a rest my man.
Asking someone to explain the reason for posting a random meaningless statistic is not unreasonable. And if they respond with insults, because they can't explain their post, then they deserve to be mocked.
If you think I'm being unreasonable, why don't you ask apollo what his Frank Bruno statistic actually represents?
http://m.connectsavannah.com/savannah/t ... id=2133328
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Golovkin at Sport Science - peak force of 2,159 lbs
Thanks for the article. Unfortunately it doesn't really explain how Frank's punch power was measured and nor does it confirm whether GGG's and Bruno's numbers can be compared.Impractical Poster wrote:He was most likely siting this article...Enlightened-One wrote:I wasn't criticising the video - I was mocking his random post about Frank Bruno that even he doesn't understand.Impractical Poster wrote:![]()
Enlightened One.... You really delight in being a prick. He's just highlighting that GGG hits like a freaking mule... and here comes Enlightened One... "Umm, if conditions were different and Jupiter was aligned with the constellation of Orion, then even I could punch harder than blah blah blah...."
Give it a rest my man.
Asking someone to explain the reason for posting a random meaningless statistic is not unreasonable. And if they respond with insults, because they can't explain their post, then they deserve to be mocked.
If you think I'm being unreasonable, why don't you ask apollo what his Frank Bruno statistic actually represents?
http://m.connectsavannah.com/savannah/t ... id=2133328
Thank you for trying to explain someone else's post though.