I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner
So you assumed correctly.
Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.
I was drunk and being an arse.
People have not been banned for far less.
Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32665
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?Realistic wrote:I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner
So you assumed correctly.
Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.
I was drunk and being an arse.
People have not been banned for far less.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Why would he; the Mods let him get away with anything. I seriously wish The Law was back on here as would not put up with his BS and disgraceful drunken comments. I will get banned for pointing this out before Horse gets banned for absolutely disgusting comments he makes in a drunker stuporBoxerbeetle wrote:Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?Realistic wrote:I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.
I was drunk and being an arse.
People have not been banned for far less.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that badBoxerbeetle wrote:Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?Realistic wrote:I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.
I was drunk and being an arse.
People have not been banned for far less.
Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.thepocketrocket wrote:I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that badBoxerbeetle wrote:Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?Realistic wrote: I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
And how GL wanting to get his Fighter Killed!!jamesmcdonnell wrote:Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.thepocketrocket wrote:I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that badBoxerbeetle wrote:
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Realistic wrote:And how GL wanting to get his Fighters Killed!!jamesmcdonnell wrote:Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.thepocketrocket wrote:
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad
Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
I said that I didn't rate him as a fighter or trainer and suggested that he was a danger to his fighters etc multiple times.thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
And then insulted anyone that had a go at me for saying it.
Obviously I don't actually believe that he wants to get his fighters hurt.
I was a being a tosser and exaggerating, because I wasn't happy with him stopping the fight.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
That's fair...Horse wrote:I said that I didn't rate him as a fighter or trainer and suggested that he was a danger to his fighters etc multiple times.thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
And then insulted anyone that had a go at me for saying it.
Obviously I don't actually believe that he wants to get his fighters hurt.
I was a being a tosser and exaggerating, because I wasn't happy with him stopping the fight.
In my job before my promotion I was a forum moderator. It is a very hard job striking the balance between discipline and not acting like Rudolf Hoess. I would often use the week long ban option for jerk like behaviour.
Just learn from it and step away from the computer when pissed. The two things don't mix.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
It would be difficult not to post at all when drunk.thepocketrocket wrote:That's fair...
In my job before my promotion I was a forum moderator. It is a very hard job striking the balance between discipline and not acting like Rudolf Hoess. I would often use the week long ban option for jerk like behaviour.
Just learn from it and step away from the computer when pissed. The two things don't mix.
Even when I'm drunk it should be obvious when I'm being an overly obnoxious jerk though.
If I've got nothing nice to say then I should consider keeping it to myself.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
He did say it Mag and I screen shot it; I will not post it on here as I do not want to get the forum into trouble. Drunk or not his true colours shone through and YET again he is allowed to get away with it without reprisal. The longer Moderators allow his behaviour the more he will continue to do it. Even a weeks ban would show he crossed the line with a warning that any reoccurrence would be a life ban. Again I despise the man and he is a flea on a rats back.magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Realistic wrote:He did say it Mag and I screen shot it; I will not post it on here as I do not want to get the forum into trouble. Drunk or not his true colours shone through and YET again he is allowed to get away with it without reprisal. The longer Moderators allow his behaviour the more he will continue to do it. Even a weeks ban would show he crossed the line with a warning that any reoccurrence would be a life ban. Again I despise the man and he is a flea on a rats back.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile. 
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
I've got to watch what I say when MI5's finest is around.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile.
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
That guy looks far too classy.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
You should watch what you say FULL STOP especially trash like last night.Horse wrote:I've got to watch what I say when MI5's finest is around.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5429
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'forcefraser wrote:Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
Abuse fraser? Maybe not, but it falls exactly within the definition of racial discrimination.dirk2686 wrote:It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'forcefraser wrote:Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5429
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017
I doubt Chinese people would find that comment that bad to be honest.dirk2686 wrote:It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'forcefraser wrote:Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......
One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.
If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
"No one likes a *nonce*, especially white ones from yorkshire"
It would be the reference to *nonce* that would offend me, not the white or Yorkshire reference.

