Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Campbell's team targeting the WBA and Linares fight. The fight may form as an eliminator to fight for that belt
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
My knowledge of Perez is basically the two crolla fights. Based on that I like Campbell's chances. Quicker and rangier that crolla, goes to the body with the left hook as well. Based on the Mendy fight crolla may be better when going to the well and resilience, but I don't think Perez will take him there anyway.
Smells of an Eddie Hearn special this.
Steady step up for Luke. Quite confident for points or stoppage
Smells of an Eddie Hearn special this.
Steady step up for Luke. Quite confident for points or stoppage
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16929
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Agree, Perez was utterly whacked by those judges. This fight is awesome.
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote:I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
McDonnells last title defence was just as bad a decision I can think of from the top of my head but I'm questioning if that is even a robbery. Poor decision yes, robbery, not convinced
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16929
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Ok moody house score cardsOssyrules wrote:What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote:I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
McDonnells last title defence was just as bad a decision I can think of from the top of my head but I'm questioning if that is even a robbery. Poor decision yes, robbery, not convinced
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Fair one for that then. I do think that some of the scorecards in England don't mirror what I'm seeing, but a lot of the time it's foreign judges.Nightmare Roy wrote:Ok moody house score cardsOssyrules wrote:What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote: I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.
McDonnells last title defence was just as bad a decision I can think of from the top of my head but I'm questioning if that is even a robbery. Poor decision yes, robbery, not convinced
I think that's judging though. See it in America regularly. The worst is still Germany imo
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Decent enough fight and a name for Campbell's record should he get the W. Not over excited about it but it's alright. Has to be Mendy next unless fast car is going to try and bring Linares back over.
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Great fight for Campbell. Good test. Hasn't Campbell been showing some decent body work since he hooked up with the trainer in Miami? Hopefully he can do a number on Perez.
A legitimate loss here & that's it for Campbell at international level.
Unless it's not
A legitimate loss here & that's it for Campbell at international level.
Unless it's not
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Naandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Surely Perez will have known for longer than that, and its just doting the i's etc and more importantly to put the main event back in the news that its been announced now? Or is that wishful thinking??
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
I think this fight would have been made weeks ago - I suspect a 8-10 week camp for both guys.
Hearn does it fairly often where he holds onto fights until the timing is a good as possible to announce them. It would have made less sense to announce it when it was agreed as it would have likely been around the Bellew-Haye fight hype.
Hearn does it fairly often where he holds onto fights until the timing is a good as possible to announce them. It would have made less sense to announce it when it was agreed as it would have likely been around the Bellew-Haye fight hype.
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
should of been mendy but oh well
could be worse
could be worse
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
I thought I heard Mendy priced himself out of the rematch.
But maybe I heard that from Hearn
But maybe I heard that from Hearn
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
With the Mendy rematch looking less and less likely I'm glad Campbell at least has a meaningful fight.
Perez is no world beater but he has competed at a higher level than Campbells previous opponents. He also looked good in his last fight, just a shame he was fighting in front of blind judges.
Campbell UD, if he isn't planning to go for the British then at least this fight should help set up a Crolla fight
Perez is no world beater but he has competed at a higher level than Campbells previous opponents. He also looked good in his last fight, just a shame he was fighting in front of blind judges.
Campbell UD, if he isn't planning to go for the British then at least this fight should help set up a Crolla fight
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
what about that lad who knocked the snot out of campbell? is he left to fight 6 rounders?
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Disgraceful if so.rio wrote:No
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
I wouldn't say it's disgraceful - I think Campbell is (rightly or wrongly) looking past the EBU belt now. He'll probably be looking for a title shot at the backend of the year.Naandrew wrote:Disgraceful if so.rio wrote:No
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
maverick23 wrote:He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
Perez is no 1 have a look yourself. It's the WBA pure utter scum.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wp-content/upl ... -march.pdf
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Campbell wanted it because no fighter from Hull has been British champion but Joe Gallagher wouldn't let Cardle fight him.keirw wrote:With the Mendy rematch looking less and less likely I'm glad Campbell at least has a meaningful fight.
Perez is no world beater but he has competed at a higher level than Campbells previous opponents. He also looked good in his last fight, just a shame he was fighting in front of blind judges.
Campbell UD, if he isn't planning to go for the British then at least this fight should help set up a Crolla fight
Cardle wanted a soft touch to get the belt outright. Embarrassment of a British champion.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
That is a bit of a joke! I don't recognise half of their top 15 either!Naandrew wrote:maverick23 wrote:He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
Perez is no 1 have a look yourself. It's the WBA pure utter scum.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wp-content/upl ... -march.pdf