I’m sorry, but I haven’t got the time to watch a boat load of lengthy iFL TV videos in order to find the one that justifies my claim about Pulev preferring to become Joshua’s mandatory challenger in order to receive a bigger payday via the purse bid process.asdfjkl wrote:Could you show me perhaps? As far as I know he could have had a shot against Anthony Joshua when AJ had a world title, but Pulev avoided that fight and fought for a Euro title instead.verlichte wrote:I hate it when people jump to conclusions without fact-checking.asdfjkl wrote: For AJ? Yes, he ducked him several times, he even acted like he didn't understand English any more when Eddie Hearn asked him about the fight.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JQR-5L1uWfg
Pulev didn’t “duck” Anthony Joshua at all, it’s been well-publicised that he insists on becoming the mandatory challenger, since he would be offered a bigger percentage of the purse split (via the purse bid process) than what was being proposed by Eddie Hearn.
I believe that Eddie Hearn clearly explained this fact when he was interviewed by Kugan Cassius via the iFL TV YouTube channel.
Pulev also preferred to go down the mandatory challenger purse bid route when he faced Wladimir Klitschko for precisely the same reason.
Instead of prematurely jumping to all sorts of derogatory conclusions, by automatically assuming that certain pugilists are “cowards” and “ducks” whenever they refuse to accept specific fights, please remember that boxers are known as “PRIZE” fighters for a reason, which means that they are likely to decline opportunities if they feel they aren’t being paid their worth.
If you adopt that stance and then research what has actually transpired, you’ll have a better understanding of the facts and the conclusions that your draw will more accurately reflect reality.
There’s nothing stopping you from watching these videos to appreciate the truth of the situation though. I’ve already done the leg work and fully-understand Pulev's viewpoint.
That being said, there are multiple threads that are easily accessible for you to read in this forum whereby multiple posters clearly explain/support the reasons for Pulev’s actions in relation to this matter.
Also, it should only take you about five minutes to research the Klitschko-Pulev situation, which perfectly mirrors Pulev’s actions for his mandatory shot at Joshua.
Be careful about your use of the word “avoid”. It’s not the first time we’ve seen promoters submit lowball offers and then boldly proclaim “duck”.
Put it this way, if a fighter like Kubrat Pulev is willing to face Anthony Joshua as the IBF’s mandatory challenger and receive a guaranteed 25% purse split via the purse bid process, but had previously rejected Eddie Hearn’s offer to face him, with the Matchroom boss subsequently using words like "duck" and "greedy" to describe the situation, then what does that tell you?