Klitschko actually tried to force a stoppage during the sixth round, he just didn't approach it in a reckless manner like Joshua's failed attempt during the fifth round, partly due to experience, physical inability due to his age and mostly because he was exhausted and still recovering from the events that took place during the previous round.candyslim wrote:No need to re-evaluate my comments at all as I'm sure you'd appreciate had you read them properly before launching into your trademark arrogant dismissal :
What is "funny" is that Joshua going for broke almost cost him the fight, whereas Klitschko's failure to go for broke in the 6th almost certainly cost him the fight. On the face of it that seems like a paradox, no?
I went on to explain that there was nothing actually funny or paradoxical at al,l because it's all a question of knowing when and when not to unleash your intended final assault.
Of course Klitschko launched his assault in the 6th when Joshua was tired and vulnerable, but it was unsuccessful because he did not go for broke when Joshua was there for the taking. That could be because Klitschko's naturally cautious persona meant that he did not want to fully commit his reserves of energy in pursuit of the stoppage in case he was unsuccessful as Joshua had been (whether he wouldn't) or maybe at 41 years of age and having taken quite a shellacking himself in the previous round, he didn't have sufficient strength / energy to finish the job i.e. (whether he couldn't). The point being that Joshua should not have survived the round.
If you still think I need to re-evaluate my comments ... I'm listening
Regardless, my explanation for Anthony Joshua's fatigue for several rounds of the Klitschko bout are accurate.