Farewell Cotto

davie · Post by **davie** » 27 Aug 2017, 04:18

One of my favourite fighters of the modern era, signed off with a comprehensive UD win last night in a world title fight, against a solid, if not spectacular opponent.

I never saw it as it was not being shown where I was and I was watching that other fight.

Huge respect to Cotto for a great career

Ruthless-RKO · Post by **Ruthless-RKO** » 27 Aug 2017, 04:22

He's still got one more fight

Covfefe · Post by **Covfefe** » 27 Aug 2017, 04:23

Pity it wasn't a middleweight title. I always fancied Mayweather to rematch Cotto if he held a version of the belt at 160.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 05:21

Ya, he's still fighting. There has been lots of talk about a Lemieux fight and theyre both with Golden Boy...

Kamegai has absolutely dreadful defense, though he can really take a shot. He's like a Japanese Provo.....

Jip · Post by **Jip** » 27 Aug 2017, 05:29

One of the best boxer of the last 15 years. Always brought excitemant to boxing and was a calm nice person outside the ring. Great career! Bye champ

Ossyrules · Post by **Ossyrules** » 27 Aug 2017, 05:39

Great fighter huge respect for cotto

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:01

He looked sharp, still enough in the tank foir Miguel to dissect Lemieux.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:02

I think Lemieux would have a very good shot of beating him.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:03

crusader wrote:I think Lemieux would have a very good shot of beating him.

Not surprised we have different views there. I'd be surprised if he was as competitive as McGregor was.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:04

You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?

pizzakid13 · Post by **pizzakid13** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:04

crusader wrote:I think Lemieux would have a very good shot of beating him.

Very good chance. Kamagei has a head of stone and marginal power. Lemieux would land and much harder. No reason to risk that when finishing his career.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:05

pizzakid13 wrote:
crusader wrote:I think Lemieux would have a very good shot of beating him.
Very good chance. Kamagei has a head of stone and marginal power. Lemieux would land and much harder. No reason to risk that when finishing his career.

Kamegai makes Provo and Rios look defensively sound

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:07

crusader wrote:You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?

When has Cotto ever done nothing?

pizzakid13 · Post by **pizzakid13** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:09

crusader wrote:
pizzakid13 wrote:
crusader wrote:I think Lemieux would have a very good shot of beating him.
Very good chance. Kamagei has a head of stone and marginal power. Lemieux would land and much harder. No reason to risk that when finishing his career.
Kamegai makes Provo and Rios look defensively sound

Nice. Lampley describing his defense as video game was hilarious. As was Jones' Texas Cobb meets Sweet Pea comment.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:17

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?
When has Cotto ever done nothing?

Cotto doesnt usually give away rounds, but I think he'll be engaging Lemieux more early and be giving him more openings than McG had against Mayweather. Punch pusher Conor won a few nothing rounds, and I dont think it will take much for Lemieux to have more notable success and hang with Cotto for longer.

You see a shutout?

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:20

crusader wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?
When has Cotto ever done nothing?
Cotto doesnt usually give away rounds, but I think he'll be engaging Lemieux more early and be giving him more openings than McG had against Mayweather. Punch pusher Conor won a few nothing rounds, and I dont think it will take much for Lemieux to have more notable success and hang with Cotto for longer.

You see a shutout?

Yeah, an entertaining beatdown. Probably a TKO in 8-10. Though, being honest, I don't see the allure of the opponent or moving up to 60.

boxing_rocks · Post by **boxing_rocks** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:33

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?
When has Cotto ever done nothing?

When did he fight somebody as powerful as Lemieux? It is easy to look good against Delvin Rodriguez, one-legged Martinez, dehydrated demoralized Geale and Kamegai.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:37

boxing_rocks wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
crusader wrote:You'd be surprised if Lemieux managed to win a couple of rounds in which Cotto was doing nothing?
When has Cotto ever done nothing?
When did he fight somebody as powerful as Lemieux? It is easy to look good against Delvin Rodriguez, one-legged Martinez, dehydrated demoralized Geale and Kamegai.

What are you talking about?

ewenhay · Post by **ewenhay** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:41

Has he definitely retired? I thought he was having one more fight.

Regardless the end is nigh and he's had a great career and fought everyone (apart from Golovkin) . A true warrior, I've got nothing but huge respect for him. I've enjoyed his fights from when he was coming through as a light welterweight. Would have liked to have seen him and Hatton fight at that time, would have been a good fight. I think Cotto would have won though.

Boxing will never have enough Miguel Cottos.

boxing_rocks · Post by **boxing_rocks** » 27 Aug 2017, 17:51

Roach wants him to fight Canelo-Golovkin winner which I doubt he will get. I also doubt that he will like realistic options like Lemieux. Most likely, he is done.

BAD INTENTIONS · Post by **BAD INTENTIONS** » 27 Aug 2017, 18:11

Why Lemieux? What a F'ing waste!

Why risk it against an aging fighter with power?
If Lemiux wins, the sport is no better.
We already know Lemiux isn't great.

Why not fight a younger guy with less power?
If this guy beats Cotto, at least we have a new guy on the scene, with a win over Cotto.

Is Lemiux some kind of big draw?
How many more PPV buys does Lemiux bring over a young opponent at 154?
Seems like a pretty pointless fight for a guy still interested in being a diva and winning belts.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Aug 2017, 18:16

Lemieux is 28....who are these significantly younger guys at 154?

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 27 Aug 2017, 18:17

crusader wrote:Lemieux is 28....

Lemiuex doesn't fit all of BI's requirements.

boxing_rocks · Post by **boxing_rocks** » 27 Aug 2017, 18:24

Lemieux is realitic because he is a GB fighter. I don't think there is enough time to make a fight against Haymon or TR fighter. Personally, I wouldn't mid to see Cotto vs Brook at 154.

punchoutsb · Post by **punchoutsb** » 27 Aug 2017, 18:29

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Why Lemieux? What a F'ing waste!

Why risk it against an aging fighter with power?
If Lemiux wins, the sport is no better.
We already know Lemiux isn't great.

Why not fight a younger guy with less power?
If this guy beats Cotto, at least we have a new guy on the scene, with a win over Cotto.

Is Lemiux some kind of big draw?
How many more PPV buys does Lemiux bring over a young opponent at 154?
Seems like a pretty pointless fight for a guy still interested in being a diva and winning belts.

If terrible, uninformed posts were circles of hell, you'd have just dug the tenth. Congratulations.

Farewell Cotto

Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto

Re: Farewell Cotto