Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
Just watched some records of some all time greats after the war in the Euro scene like Joe Bugner, Sir Henry Cooper or Jürgen Blin. And I asked myself: Who were the best of them? So I tried to make a Top Ten what is very difficult. What do you guys think about such a ranking?
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
tigerpomfret
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 104
- Joined: 20 Jan 2006, 16:50
I would rate Joe Bugner superior to all the others,not sure of schemling,lewis would scrap in top 5 i suppose,johanson as well,Mildenberger gets in,far far superior to cooper,who should`nt even be metioned,intresting naming Vitali klitschko,but he never fought anyone ecept overated lewis,so there you go.
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
I rate them together on 1, Max beat maybe the best boxer of all time together with Ali. Lennox hasn´t that aura and is maybe no that legend. Maybe in 20 years I have Lennox on 1 and another opinion about him. I don´t like him that much personally and the way he "acted" in the last years of his career and his inactivity.......jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hang about! Schmeling rates above Lewis? Based on what, a solitary victory over an inexperienced Louis?
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
Lewis is No1 by some stretch in my eyes.BubiScholz wrote:Just watched some records of some all time greats after the war in the Euro scene like Joe Bugner, Sir Henry Cooper or Jürgen Blin. And I asked myself: Who were the best of them? So I tried to make a Top Ten what is very difficult. What do you guys think about such a ranking?
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
Also I have only seen Johansson's 3 fights with Patterson but he didnt impress me at all. Small, tentative and with only a right hand howitzer to make up for the defects.
In terms of skill Bugner is far superior to Carnera and Ingo
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
what a ridiculous statement.
From pomfret that is.....
Who the fornicate did Bugner ever beat. He let an out of shape and past it Ali beat him, and fought like a frightened rabbit his whole career.
Going the distance with great fighters doesn't mean much if you are not competitive.
Lewis beat far better competition than Buger, who looked the part, had great defensive skills, but a heart the size of a walnut.
Bugner lost all his biggest fights, Lewis won his, big difference.
Name Bugner's best wins.
Ray Mercer is better than ANYONE Bugner beat, Bruno is probably better than any of the names of Bugner's ledger, christ Bugner lost to MARVIS Frazier!!
I'd love to hear a rationale for Bugner being ahead of Lewis, except for being a Lewis hater of course.
From pomfret that is.....
Who the fornicate did Bugner ever beat. He let an out of shape and past it Ali beat him, and fought like a frightened rabbit his whole career.
Going the distance with great fighters doesn't mean much if you are not competitive.
Lewis beat far better competition than Buger, who looked the part, had great defensive skills, but a heart the size of a walnut.
Bugner lost all his biggest fights, Lewis won his, big difference.
Name Bugner's best wins.
Ray Mercer is better than ANYONE Bugner beat, Bruno is probably better than any of the names of Bugner's ledger, christ Bugner lost to MARVIS Frazier!!
I'd love to hear a rationale for Bugner being ahead of Lewis, except for being a Lewis hater of course.
I know it's wrong to take boxrec rankings as anything other than the random generations of a computer, but they do make quite interesting reading in this issue:
http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?natio ... &SUBMIT=Go
http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?natio ... &SUBMIT=Go
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
Good list except that LL has indeed to be above Schmeling and not equal (as I read your ranking). Schnmeling is clearly #2 though.BubiScholz wrote:Just watched some records of some all time greats after the war in the Euro scene like Joe Bugner, Sir Henry Cooper or Jürgen Blin. And I asked myself: Who were the best of them? So I tried to make a Top Ten what is very difficult. What do you guys think about such a ranking?
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
Carnera should be ranked above Cooper. And Vlad and perhaps even Bruno could also be ranked a bit higher. Both held titles, while Mildenberger was never more than a 2nd-rate contender, for example.
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

Kind of interesting. However, if you do the same for the light-heavyweight divisino, for example, you get complete crap. Anyoe ever heard of the Greek there who's ranked #1?Coconut wrote:I know it's wrong to take boxrec rankings as anything other than the random generations of a computer, but they do make quite interesting reading in this issue:
http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?natio ... &SUBMIT=Go
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
Trouble with Carnera though is, just how many of his fights were fixed. We know some of them were for certain, but just how many?pundit wrote:Good list except that LL has indeed to be above Schmeling and not equal (as I read your ranking). Schnmeling is clearly #2 though.BubiScholz wrote:Just watched some records of some all time greats after the war in the Euro scene like Joe Bugner, Sir Henry Cooper or Jürgen Blin. And I asked myself: Who were the best of them? So I tried to make a Top Ten what is very difficult. What do you guys think about such a ranking?
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
Carnera should be ranked above Cooper. And Vlad and perhaps even Bruno could also be ranked a bit higher. Both held titles, while Mildenberger was never more than a 2nd-rate contender, for example.
-
ABA Boxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 772
- Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 13:37
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
I think the Ambling Alp probably made a better strong man then fighter...jamesmcdonnell wrote: Trouble with Carnera though is, just how many of his fights were fixed. We know some of them were for certain, but just how many?
He was owned by the mob as far as I can remember
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11805
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
the #1 in Light Heavy is a no-brainer I thinkpundit wrote:Kind of interesting. However, if you do the same for the light-heavyweight divisino, for example, you get complete crap. Anyoe ever heard of the Greek there who's ranked #1?Coconut wrote:I know it's wrong to take boxrec rankings as anything other than the random generations of a computer, but they do make quite interesting reading in this issue:
http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?natio ... &SUBMIT=Go
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
Mildenberger was top in Europe in his peak and Ali once said that it was one of his hardest fights ever and Mildenberger would have held a title later on when there were more titles available. Don´t forget that there was only one title and Ali at his peak...... In these times there was no European who could beat Americas elite boxers in the best area in Heavyweight boxing. Ali, Frazier or Foreman are among the best Heavyweights of all time. In these times a Euro title was much more worth than today and was real big in TV and press media.pundit wrote:Good list except that LL has indeed to be above Schmeling and not equal (as I read your ranking). Schnmeling is clearly #2 though.BubiScholz wrote:Just watched some records of some all time greats after the war in the Euro scene like Joe Bugner, Sir Henry Cooper or Jürgen Blin. And I asked myself: Who were the best of them? So I tried to make a Top Ten what is very difficult. What do you guys think about such a ranking?
1. Max Schmeling
Lennox Lewis
3. Ingemar Johansson
4. Vitali Klitschko
5. Sir Henry Cooper
6..Primo Carnera
7. Joe Bugner
8. Karl Mildenberger
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Frank Bruno
IMO it is very difficult to compare actual fighters with older times. How much is a Euro title in 1960 worth and so on......
Carnera should be ranked above Cooper. And Vlad and perhaps even Bruno could also be ranked a bit higher. Both held titles, while Mildenberger was never more than a 2nd-rate contender, for example.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Top Ten Heavyweight Europe All Time
BubiScholz wrote:
Mildenberger was top in Europe in his peak and Ali once said that it was one of his hardest fights ever and Mildenberger would have held a title later on when there were more titles available. Don´t forget that there was only one title and Ali at his peak...... In these times there was no European who could beat Americas elite boxers in the best area in Heavyweight boxing. Ali, Frazier or Foreman are among the best Heavyweights of all time. In these times a Euro title was much more worth than today and was real big in TV and press media.
I don't think it's hugely commendable having someone say that you'd have held a title if there were more titles available. It's like saying you'd have a better looking girlfriend if suddenly 4 times more girls became good looking.
Back in the day, a Euro title guaranteed you a top 10 ranking, I think I'm right in saying.