You're showing severe symptom's of a different sort gilg...Dissociative Identity Disorder... You suffer from the delusion that you're somebody who actually knows what he's talking about...gilgamesh wrote: ↑03 Apr 2018, 12:20Or you could've just simply studied the sport a little bit and figured these things out. I wasn't watching Boxing back in 1994, but I know the Boxing scene in 1994 pretty well because I've read up on it, and seen many fights from that era.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑03 Apr 2018, 11:10Someone could have been alive at the time and now think that Lewis was the dominant heavyweight in the world at the time of the premature stoppage of the first McCall-Lewis fight.gilgamesh wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 23:22
You're showing that you've been dishonest about your age again. If you were alive for the Lennox Lewis vs Oliver McCall 1 fight you'd know that Lennox Lewis wasn't "The Dominant Heavyweight Champion of the World" at that time. He was a contender with a belt.
He didn't really gain recognition as THE MAN at Heavyweight until the win over Holyfield years later.
However, someone who was actually following the sport at the time would not have made that claim.
Still though I think the words here from Kalan show that either
A. He wasn't watching Boxing in 1994
B. Wasn't alive in 1994
or C. Tends to write revisionist history and pretend things were a different way than they were.
He's already shown a tendency toward C, but perhaps A or B could be a sympton of C.
I suggest you read up a little more on the era and discover who was the only undefeated Heavyweight Champion at that time who actually had a Title Defense... If you that brain thinking really hard you may discover it was Lewis.