The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post Reply
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by oogiebe »

Tonight we saw the best of times in Whyte/Chisora and Warrington/Frampton

We also saw the worst of times; The Charlo fights scoring.

WTF? Boxing just keeps shooting itself in the foot.

Special shout out goes to Larry Hazzard, who should never be allowed to score a fight again.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by Mexi-Box »

It's pretty funny that the wrong Charlo won tonight. Who knew it'd be so backwards. 119-108 is obviously not watching the fight, though.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by jamamb »

maybe the judges were from the future and had already seen the fights, but got the charlos mixed up, so the first scores were actually supposed to be for the second fight and vice verse

because 115-113 which harrison got seemed about right for korobov

and the 116-112 that mall got seemed about right for mell
Last edited by jamamb on 23 Dec 2018, 00:42, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by oogiebe »

Mexi-Box wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:40 It's pretty funny that the wrong Charlo won tonight. Who knew it'd be so backwards. 119-108 is obviously not watching the fight, though.
The Jermell decision was far worse, in my not so humble opinion.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101284
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

oogiebe wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:41
Mexi-Box wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:40 It's pretty funny that the wrong Charlo won tonight. Who knew it'd be so backwards. 119-108 is obviously not watching the fight, though.
The Jermell decision was far worse, in my not so humble opinion.
I heard some say Tony deserved it and that he took the early rounds?
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by oogiebe »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 04:17
oogiebe wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:41
Mexi-Box wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:40 It's pretty funny that the wrong Charlo won tonight. Who knew it'd be so backwards. 119-108 is obviously not watching the fight, though.
The Jermell decision was far worse, in my not so humble opinion.
I heard some say Tony deserved it and that he took the early rounds?
-I had to leave the fight after 10 but I had it 7-3 Charlo, whom I don't like.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46366
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by gilgamesh »

oogiebe wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:35 Tonight we saw the best of times in Whyte/Chisora and Warrington/Frampton

We also saw the worst of times; The Charlo fights scoring.

WTF? Boxing just keeps shooting itself in the foot.

Special shout out goes to Larry Hazzard, who should never be allowed to score a fight again.
Larry Hazzard Fox's ringside scorer? What was wrong with his scores?
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by oogiebe »

gilgamesh wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 13:46
oogiebe wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:35 Tonight we saw the best of times in Whyte/Chisora and Warrington/Frampton

We also saw the worst of times; The Charlo fights scoring.

WTF? Boxing just keeps shooting itself in the foot.

Special shout out goes to Larry Hazzard, who should never be allowed to score a fight again.
Larry Hazzard Fox's ringside scorer? What was wrong with his scores?
Judge in Korobov fight had it 119-108 (Larry Hazzard Jr)
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by Mexi-Box »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 04:17
oogiebe wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:41
Mexi-Box wrote: 23 Dec 2018, 00:40 It's pretty funny that the wrong Charlo won tonight. Who knew it'd be so backwards. 119-108 is obviously not watching the fight, though.
The Jermell decision was far worse, in my not so humble opinion.
I heard some say Tony deserved it and that he took the early rounds?
Actually, I've heard the same on another forum. I did not see any of the early rounds, and I was barely paying attention. I think I missed all 6 starting rounds, and I was off-and-on again watching. Makes me feel a bit happier for Harrison now. Scorecards weren't ridiculous either, though.

I'm not about to rewatch that fight. It was a snoozer and Charlo should've lost for struggling with a guy like Harrison anyways.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by jamamb »

ive hardly seen anyone say tony won, plus pretty much any fight you get someone with a wacky card who just wants to be different, best ive seen for him for someone who actually put a case forward was 6-6, a lot of 'it was closer then the commentary said' but those guys have it for charlo too
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

Post by oogiebe »

jamamb wrote: 24 Dec 2018, 18:22 ive hardly seen anyone say tony won, plus pretty much any fight you get someone with a wacky card who just wants to be different, best ive seen for him for someone who actually put a case forward was 6-6, a lot of 'it was closer then the commentary said' but those guys have it for charlo too
I had to pick me kid up but left the fight at 7-3 charlo after 10. And I'm a charlo hater.
Post Reply