Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post Reply
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Luckybattles »

I admire porters effort and intensify but he seems like a better version of Emmanuel Augustus. Not even sure if I would put him above Mikey Ward in due to his lack of punching power and ability to come up just short in big fight
Bandog
Featherweight
Posts: 2471
Joined: 27 Jul 2019, 08:02

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Bandog »

To call him either is kind of an insult. He's proven he's among the best at the weight. Jouneymen and sub par champs don't stay at top 5 in the world on a consistant basis.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by margaret thatcher »

He is a pretty high level fighter. Good world class but not at that elite P4P level.
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by NateJR »

:lol: :lol: :lol: ... Are you serious, below Mickey Ward? Porter would beat Mickey Ward any day of the week and twice on Sunday. He's in one of the most stacked divisions in boxing with Spence, Crawford and Pacquiao current holding the titles.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by margaret thatcher »

He also won loads as an amateur too btw (oddly enough beating Usyk once). He's ugly but effective.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by boxing_rocks »

margaret thatcher wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 18:44 beating Usyk once
I am wondering what weight that was at.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by margaret thatcher »

165
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by boxing_rocks »

Both English and Russian language wikipedia pages mention him losing to Korobov in 2006, but nothing about Porter.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by margaret thatcher »

It's well documented and there are a couple videos of Porter talking about it.

23-20 for Porter in 2006, during a US-Ukraine duel held in the US. If it makes you feel better, look at the location and call it an awful robbery.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Luckybattles »

I don’t know. Anyone who can throw and land that many punches without hurting anyone is the definition of a volume puncher.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9439
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by tiny_acres »

Bandog wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 18:21 To call him either is kind of an insult. He's proven he's among the best at the weight. Jouneymen and sub par champs don't stay at top 5 in the world on a consistant basis.
X2.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Onetimeonly »

Bandog wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 18:21 To call him either is kind of an insult. He's proven he's among the best at the weight. Jouneymen and sub par champs don't stay at top 5 in the world on a consistant basis.
Entirely an insult. Not only to Porter but to this forum and anyone subjected to reading that crap.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Luckybattles »

Onetimeonly wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 21:07
Bandog wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 18:21 To call him either is kind of an insult. He's proven he's among the best at the weight. Jouneymen and sub par champs don't stay at top 5 in the world on a consistant basis.
Entirely an insult. Not only to Porter but to this forum and anyone subjected to reading that crap.
Yeah, in an era when guys that can’t seem to crack an egg call themselves “one time” people easily forget what serous welterweights were all about not long ago. Any guy who lands here hundreds of clean shots with no effect is more reminiscent of a vinny pazienza and less Felix Trinidad
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Onetimeonly »

Crawford would school Tito. Thurman wouldn't though, that nickname is so off.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26505
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by KiwiRider »

Porter has earned his dues.
He has taken on tough fights, won some, lost some. And he is anything but protected.
Personally I hate his style. But I do admire his courage.
He has also gradually proved his own particular style. The Shawn Porter we saw on the weekend was better than say, 2 years ago.
Unfortunately for him, opponents only have to study his previous fights to know what he brings. Ugas almost had the measure of him, and Spence- when he wasn't getting dragged into Porter's world, did as well.
The Thurman who fought Pac, would lose to 2019 Porter.
He is top #4 in a quality division and ain't no easy night for anyone.
Where he goes from here, I don't know.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9439
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by tiny_acres »

KiwiRider wrote: 01 Oct 2019, 17:42 Porter has earned his dues.
He has taken on tough fights, won some, lost some. And he is anything but protected.
Personally I hate his style. But I do admire his courage.
He has also gradually proved his own particular style. The Shawn Porter we saw on the weekend was better than say, 2 years ago.
Unfortunately for him, opponents only have to study his previous fights to know what he brings. Ugas almost had the measure of him, and Spence- when he wasn't getting dragged into Porter's world, did as well.
The Thurman who fought Pac, would lose to 2019 Porter.
He is top #4 in a quality division and ain't no easy night for anyone.
Where he goes from here, I don't know.
4th or 5th is a fair assesment
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46362
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by gilgamesh »

Luckybattles wrote: 30 Sep 2019, 17:59 I admire porters effort and intensify but he seems like a better version of Emmanuel Augustus. Not even sure if I would put him above Mikey Ward in due to his lack of punching power and ability to come up just short in big fight
Someone needs to brush up on their Boxing terminology.

He's not even close to a journeyman.

If you wanna call him a Sub-Par Champ I guess that's fair as he's never been considered THE man in his division, but he's definitely a Top 5 guy. Augustus or Ward never were on their best day.
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Luckybattles »

The big thing in common with Agustus is that Porter can land hundreds of punches, many or most of them clean, and it will have no effect on any top opponent. He has to overwhelm opponents with a fenzy combinations in order to be competitive. I really do admire that but I also realize that this is typically a sign of a less talented guy with a lot of heart and willingness to take your best shot to land 4 of his. I realize it’s unfair to say this but this is the reality. Porter will never be able to take his time and pick a few deadly shots here and there while maintaining defensive integrity. He will always fight every round like the final round. He doesn’t even break guys down despite the enormous volume of punches. I think the pazmanian devil is a fair comparison
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3483
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Cent0089 »

Porter is a real deal champion. 147 is just very stacked division so he has 3 close losses.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Paci »

Who gives a flying f*ck?

A fanboy/Troll-thread
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Porter a sub par champ or great journeyman

Post by Onetimeonly »

Luckybattles wrote: 02 Oct 2019, 00:30 The big thing in common with Agustus is that Porter can land hundreds of punches, many or most of them clean, and it will have no effect on any top opponent. He has to overwhelm opponents with a fenzy combinations in order to be competitive. I really do admire that but I also realize that this is typically a sign of a less talented guy with a lot of heart and willingness to take your best shot to land 4 of his. I realize it’s unfair to say this but this is the reality. Porter will never be able to take his time and pick a few deadly shots here and there while maintaining defensive integrity. He will always fight every round like the final round. He doesn’t even break guys down despite the enormous volume of punches. I think the pazmanian devil is a fair comparison
:lol:
Post Reply