No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

bwu
Middleweight
Posts: 429
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 20:08

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by bwu »

It's doubtful that anything we write here will sway anyone's opinion about this oft-discussed topic. Suffice it to say that they were two of the greatest boxers of all time. Their first fight was a masterpiece. Personally, I tend to think that Duran ranks higher at lightweight than Leonard does at welterweight and I believe those were the divisions in which they were in their respective primes.

However, between the two of them, I can't help but conclude that Leonard was the superior fighter. The only fight Duran won was also the closest. Leonard got a TKO in the second match and dominated the third.

While this thread is about the second fight, it seems to me that their third bout is the most telling. For about nine years, all we heard was how much Duran wanted that fight and how he was determined to avenge himself. I believed such talk and I was sure he would beat Sugar Ray in that final match. That turned out to be a load of crap. Duran let himself balloon up after the Barkley win and he was dominated by Leonard.

As I said in an earlier post, I think there was a very accurate description of what really happened. It was shocking at the time and it upset a lot of people. But it isn't a mystery.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

elmersalsa wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 14:19
Ambling Alp II wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 12:35 Yep. That is pretty much what happened. Better fighter won. Quitting like that instead of at least trying will always tarnish his legacy.
superb performance by Leonard which almost always gets overlooked.
I don't think he was the better fighter. He caught a Duran in a bad night, which was a beautifully created strategy.
His strategy was to catch Duran in a "bad night"? That doesn't even make sense.
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Duran1970 »

bwu wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 20:53 It's doubtful that anything we write here will sway anyone's opinion about this oft-discussed topic. Suffice it to say that they were two of the greatest boxers of all time. Their first fight was a masterpiece. Personally, I tend to think that Duran ranks higher at lightweight than Leonard does at welterweight and I believe those were the divisions in which they were in their respective primes.

However, between the two of them, I can't help but conclude that Leonard was the superior fighter. The only fight Duran won was also the closest. Leonard got a TKO in the second match and dominated the third.

While this thread is about the second fight, it seems to me that their third bout is the most telling. For about nine years, all we heard was how much Duran wanted that fight and how he was determined to avenge himself. I believed such talk and I was sure he would beat Sugar Ray in that final match. That turned out to be a load of crap. Duran let himself balloon up after the Barkley win and he was dominated by Leonard.

As I said in an earlier post, I think there was a very accurate description of what really happened. It was shocking at the time and it upset a lot of people. But it isn't a mystery.
Their third bout the most telling??
Really?
bwu
Middleweight
Posts: 429
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 20:08

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by bwu »

You betcha. Think it through.

Duran had the chance to undo the biggest mistake of his career. Leonard was on the slide, too. Instead of rising to the occasion, Duran pulled the same nonsense in between fights that cost him in the past.

Roberto looked better and won more rounds in the second fight than he did in the third. But it wasn’t like he was shot. He had plenty of good efforts in the nineties.

As the young people say these days, Leonard was living in his head, rent free.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

His non effort in the third fight has always been a mystery. In some ways it was worse than the second fight.
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4798
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by wouter »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 08:26 His non effort in the third fight has always been a mystery. In some ways it was worse than the second fight.
Perhaps Vlad can arrange an interview and ask him.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

wouter wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 09:12
Tuan_Jim wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 08:26 His non effort in the third fight has always been a mystery. In some ways it was worse than the second fight.
Perhaps Vlad can arrange an interview and ask him.
'You fought Sugar Ray a third time........'

Yes?

.............

'Okay. Next you fight Pat Lawlor. Were you knocked out or stopped?'
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Duran1970 »

Lol...the third fight is the least relevant of the three..just a cash grab from two finished fighters..
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by DrDuke »

The 3rd fight was just unnecessary in terms of legacy. Leonard was way past prime, Duran was completely shot. They both should have retired forever after their previous fights.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Onetimeonly »

DrDuke wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 04:44 The 3rd fight was just unnecessary in terms of legacy. Leonard was way past prime, Duran was completely shot. They both should have retired forever after their previous fights.
Obviously it was terrible and both beyond their primes but Duran was not shot.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

I thought Duran coming off the high of beating Barkley would at least attempt to summon up a special performance for Leonard, especially since he had waited nine years to get him back in the ring. Fight III seems more inexplicable to me than II.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Onetimeonly »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 13:20 I thought Duran coming off the high of beating Barkley would at least attempt to summon up a special performance for Leonard, especially since he had waited nine years to get him back in the ring. Fight III seems more inexplicable to me than II.
:TU:

The cold temperatures and huge ring are a nice excuse, and at that age Duran couldn't chase him down, but his effort was much worse than no mas.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15646
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 22:02
elmersalsa wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 14:19
Ambling Alp II wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 12:35 Yep. That is pretty much what happened. Better fighter won. Quitting like that instead of at least trying will always tarnish his legacy.
superb performance by Leonard which almost always gets overlooked.
I don't think he was the better fighter. He caught a Duran in a bad night, which was a beautifully created strategy.
His strategy was to catch Duran in a "bad night"? That doesn't even make sense.
And do you believe that Duran was at his best of shape like in Montreal?
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Onetimeonly »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:33 No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
You'll have to forgive Elmer, Leonard was his second favorite fighter.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Oh that's right. Even though he once said he wasn't a "real fighter". :lol:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Onetimeonly »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 21:49 Oh that's right. Even though he once said he wasn't a "real fighter". :lol:
Duran, Leonard, Ali and delahoya is his mount Rushmore.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15646
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:33 No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
It was sheer brilliance. A brilliant strategy to get an out of shape Duran into the ring as quick as possible. The $8 million dollar bait worked in favor of Sugar Ray. He CAUGHT DURAN IN AN OFF NIGHT. And that what happened.

But, when both were in their best of shape, who won? I don't want to hear that Sugar Ray did not fight his fight crap. He got whupped! He fought his fight. End of story.

If you believe that Duran was at his very best, then I could believe he had stomach cramps. And why not?
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15646
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by elmersalsa »

Onetimeonly wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:37
Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:33 No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
You'll have to forgive Elmer, Leonard was his second favorite fighter.
And he is. Actually, my 3rd favorite behind Duran and Ali.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Onetimeonly »

elmersalsa wrote: 02 Dec 2020, 18:52
Onetimeonly wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:37
Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:33 No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
You'll have to forgive Elmer, Leonard was his second favorite fighter.
And he is. Actually, my 3rd favorite behind Duran and Ali.
And Oscar.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15646
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by elmersalsa »

Onetimeonly wrote: 02 Dec 2020, 18:55
elmersalsa wrote: 02 Dec 2020, 18:52
Onetimeonly wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:37

You'll have to forgive Elmer, Leonard was his second favorite fighter.
And he is. Actually, my 3rd favorite behind Duran and Ali.
And Oscar.
I never liked Oscar De La Hoya. Especially when he did not close the show against Felix "Tito" Trinidad in a fight to put himself amongst the greats of all time. He COMPLETELY FLUNKED! None of the two, (Tito nor Oscar) proved to me that they were top 100 all-time great worthy.
detamour
Lightweight
Posts: 69
Joined: 02 Apr 2018, 12:46

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by detamour »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 27 Nov 2020, 18:45 Why is this result so mysterious to people? Duran hadn't prepared like he did the first time, couldn't win, was being mocked and quit in a rage.

Ray fought Durans fight in the first fight, then fought his fight and Duran surrendered simpe aint it!!
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15646
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by elmersalsa »

detamour wrote: 03 Dec 2020, 07:58
Tuan_Jim wrote: 27 Nov 2020, 18:45 Why is this result so mysterious to people? Duran hadn't prepared like he did the first time, couldn't win, was being mocked and quit in a rage.

Ray fought Durans fight in the first fight, then fought his fight and Duran surrendered simpe aint it!!
Sugar Ray fought his fight. He just got whupped the first time around. He caught Duran in AN OFF NIGHT in No Mas.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by DrDuke »

elmersalsa wrote: 03 Dec 2020, 11:26
detamour wrote: 03 Dec 2020, 07:58
Tuan_Jim wrote: 27 Nov 2020, 18:45 Why is this result so mysterious to people? Duran hadn't prepared like he did the first time, couldn't win, was being mocked and quit in a rage.

Ray fought Durans fight in the first fight, then fought his fight and Duran surrendered simpe aint it!!
Sugar Ray fought his fight. He just got whupped the first time around. He caught Duran in AN OFF NIGHT in No Mas.
He wasn't whupped, it was highly competetive.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: No Mas: 40 Years Later, What Really Happened?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

elmersalsa wrote: 02 Dec 2020, 18:52
Onetimeonly wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:37
Ambling Alp II wrote: 01 Dec 2020, 20:33 No, obviously Leonard's strategy of catching Duran on a bad night worked. Sheer brilliance! Why don't other fighters do the same thing? It seems so full-proof.

Obviously Duran spent five months "partying", gained 50 pounds, then lost it all back, and somehow had no idea that he was supposed to fight that night. We certainly can't count this fight.
You'll have to forgive Elmer, Leonard was his second favorite fighter.
And he is. Actually, my 3rd favorite behind Duran and Ali.
you are so full of crap. You hate Leonard, just admit it. The only reason that you pretend that you like him is so that you act like you are being objective when comparing him to Duran. You have let it slip over the years your hatred of Leonard.
Post Reply