Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | PPV - 26 April 2025
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
What's the excuse he's using? Anyone got the quote?
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
So he's not actually given an excuse yet. Just declaring himself innocent based on information nobody else has access to.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 09:35https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/63954227
That's the latest he said.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
yeh and talking about God.joshj909 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 10:03So he's not actually given an excuse yet. Just declaring himself innocent based on information nobody else has access to.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 09:35https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/63954227
That's the latest he said.
-
Lenny Cravats
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7976
- Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
KiwiRider wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 14:04Oi!polecateddy wrote: ↑16 Dec 2022, 03:59 He’s effectively blaming the farmers for the contamination that has happened TWICE! Tyson Fury blamed a farmer too. They have a lot to answer for!
We are far too busy fixing fences, mending pumps, scrubbing troughs, welding gates, servicing tractors, gravelling muddy tracks and rooting livestock to bother with that crap.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Conor Benn 'submits 270-page document to the WBC in a bid to clear his name' following his positive drugs test that saw his fight against Chris Eubank Jr scrapped - after the Brit claimed his team had 'proven his innocence'
Conor Benn's legal team have submitted a 270-page document to the WBC. The 26-year-old has continued to plead innocence after two positive drug tests
Conor Benn's legal team has produced a 270-page document to the World Boxing Council in order to prove his innocence after his highly-anticipated bout with Chris Eubank Jr. was cancelled due to two failed drugs tests.
The 26-year-old failed two tests, from the WBC and the Boxing Board of Control after both tests showed evidence of the banned substance clomifene.
Sportsmail's Riath Al-Samarrai initially broke the story of Benn's failed test on October 6, and Benn took to social media earlier in December to break his silence on the ongoing investigation into his positive tests.
The fight with Eubank was cancelled, before the welterweight turned over his license to the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBC), which has an ongoing investigation into the positive tests separate from that of the WBC.
The WBC's verdict was expected at the end of December, however with the mammoth document now submitted, it is unclear whether that decision will come at a later date.
WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman told the Telegraph: 'We have the document which is 270 pages long. We have just received it a couple of days ago and it will take some time to complete our investigation, but we are addressing it as we speak.
'We have a special committee with experts in different areas that will go through it and will make the full investigation.'
'I'm not going to go into details. The WBC has a full committee overlooking and addressing this specific topic and we want this to be resolved as soon as possible.
'I expected this to be finished by the end of December but it's 270 pages and there are many different things that have to be addressed so I don't know how long it's going to take.'
'But let me be clear, this matter is only and exclusively for the WBC, it has nothing to do with the Boxing Board [investigation] and UKAD.
'I don't know if he's suspended or not, this is only regarding where the boxer stands with the WBC test and whether he is ranked with us. We are doing our own protocol for the WBC exclusively.'
The 26-year-old admitted to failed tests in July, with the WBC, and September, with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association, with both returning evidence of the banned substance.
Clomifene is a women's fertility drug which is classified under hormone and metabolic regulators and can increase testosterone in men.
Benn has maintained his innocence ever since the news broke. However, he has refrained from speaking publicly due to the ongoing investigation. His promoter Eddie Hearn has also abstained from speaking in detail about the situation.
However, Benn has taken to social media to speak about the situation. He discussed the impact it was having on his mental health and pleaded his innocence.
And his promoter Hearn may not have spoken publicly about the investigation, but he clearly has full faith in his fighter's innocence.
The infamous promoter recently told iD Boxing: 'I can't wait because I think a lot of people will be surprised by what's about to come out about Conor Benn.
'I think he's going to be fighting sooner than you think. If he does receive a ban, which from the information that we have, I don't think it's necessarily it's fair.
'But if it is, I don't think it's going to be a long ban at all. I don't want to be too cocksure, but I think it's going to be really interesting about what comes out here.
'I think there's a very good chance that he won't be receiving a ban. Again, I can't say too much, but that information. This is an independent [investigation].
'This is a legal system that is being rolled through people with all the news and facts. In my opinion, from what I've seen, if there is a ban, it cannot be a sizable ban from the facts that will be produced.'
Conor Benn's legal team have submitted a 270-page document to the WBC. The 26-year-old has continued to plead innocence after two positive drug tests
Conor Benn's legal team has produced a 270-page document to the World Boxing Council in order to prove his innocence after his highly-anticipated bout with Chris Eubank Jr. was cancelled due to two failed drugs tests.
The 26-year-old failed two tests, from the WBC and the Boxing Board of Control after both tests showed evidence of the banned substance clomifene.
Sportsmail's Riath Al-Samarrai initially broke the story of Benn's failed test on October 6, and Benn took to social media earlier in December to break his silence on the ongoing investigation into his positive tests.
The fight with Eubank was cancelled, before the welterweight turned over his license to the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBC), which has an ongoing investigation into the positive tests separate from that of the WBC.
The WBC's verdict was expected at the end of December, however with the mammoth document now submitted, it is unclear whether that decision will come at a later date.
WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman told the Telegraph: 'We have the document which is 270 pages long. We have just received it a couple of days ago and it will take some time to complete our investigation, but we are addressing it as we speak.
'We have a special committee with experts in different areas that will go through it and will make the full investigation.'
'I'm not going to go into details. The WBC has a full committee overlooking and addressing this specific topic and we want this to be resolved as soon as possible.
'I expected this to be finished by the end of December but it's 270 pages and there are many different things that have to be addressed so I don't know how long it's going to take.'
'But let me be clear, this matter is only and exclusively for the WBC, it has nothing to do with the Boxing Board [investigation] and UKAD.
'I don't know if he's suspended or not, this is only regarding where the boxer stands with the WBC test and whether he is ranked with us. We are doing our own protocol for the WBC exclusively.'
The 26-year-old admitted to failed tests in July, with the WBC, and September, with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association, with both returning evidence of the banned substance.
Clomifene is a women's fertility drug which is classified under hormone and metabolic regulators and can increase testosterone in men.
Benn has maintained his innocence ever since the news broke. However, he has refrained from speaking publicly due to the ongoing investigation. His promoter Eddie Hearn has also abstained from speaking in detail about the situation.
However, Benn has taken to social media to speak about the situation. He discussed the impact it was having on his mental health and pleaded his innocence.
And his promoter Hearn may not have spoken publicly about the investigation, but he clearly has full faith in his fighter's innocence.
The infamous promoter recently told iD Boxing: 'I can't wait because I think a lot of people will be surprised by what's about to come out about Conor Benn.
'I think he's going to be fighting sooner than you think. If he does receive a ban, which from the information that we have, I don't think it's necessarily it's fair.
'But if it is, I don't think it's going to be a long ban at all. I don't want to be too cocksure, but I think it's going to be really interesting about what comes out here.
'I think there's a very good chance that he won't be receiving a ban. Again, I can't say too much, but that information. This is an independent [investigation].
'This is a legal system that is being rolled through people with all the news and facts. In my opinion, from what I've seen, if there is a ban, it cannot be a sizable ban from the facts that will be produced.'
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
bluff tactics being used to murky the waters, create doubt in the minds of the gullible, without providing any clear factual evidence that he is innocent. Utter scum.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32676
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Would an innocent person need 270 pages? 
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100849
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Yeh and why WBC?
They’re not a commission are they?
They’re not a commission are they?
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
"infamous promotor" 
So true especially in this instance.
And 270 pages?
Hope it cost him a fortune. There is no excuse, he is dirty. The quickest and easiest way to prove his innocence would have been a hair sample, and he hasn't done that.
Why?
Because he is guilty.
So true especially in this instance.
And 270 pages?
Hope it cost him a fortune. There is no excuse, he is dirty. The quickest and easiest way to prove his innocence would have been a hair sample, and he hasn't done that.
Why?
Because he is guilty.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39211
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
being extremely vague and long winded is always what people do when theyre totally innocent.......
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
True - as soon as I saw the 270 pages my first thought was that there was a lot of legal waffle around some technicalitiesmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 14:26 being extremely vague and long winded is always what people do when theyre totally innocent.......
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
can anyone here explain to me what the WBC have to do with this situation.
call me cynical but it just sounds like hes sold his soul and getting into bed with an organisation in exchange for a pass. pure business.
call me cynical but it just sounds like hes sold his soul and getting into bed with an organisation in exchange for a pass. pure business.
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Anyone ever seen Theresa May and Colin Hart in the same room?
-
My T Sharp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1931
- Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
268 pages are listing his daily egg intake
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
There must be one word on each page. 
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
270 pages suggest he has no great excuse so is just going to shiit in the lake and muddy the waters...
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Think its obvious now whats happenning , Benns getting into bed with the WBC , they will find him not guilty , stating its the farmers who jumped him and forced him to eat an egg a day for 270 days , they know because he had the good sence to document each and every egg . .... Bbbc will say they cannot ban a boxer who is'nt part of there organization ,however we can refuse him a liscence if he applys , because its not our test he failed .
,, Benn will registar with Albania , Australia or somewhere else , and Eddie will still promte the fight probably in Dubai , stating its too big for the UK anyway
,, Benn will registar with Albania , Australia or somewhere else , and Eddie will still promte the fight probably in Dubai , stating its too big for the UK anyway
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
then if his carrer is still buzzing BBBoC will want there cut and offer to licence him with a back dated 2 year ban which will have been served in there eyes as he hadnt competed in there commision for 2 years....coneye wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 18:54 Think its obvious now whats happenning , Benns getting into bed with the WBC , they will find him not guilty , stating its the farmers who jumped him and forced him to eat an egg a day for 270 days , they know because he had the good sence to document each and every egg . .... Bbbc will say they cannot ban a boxer who is'nt part of there organization ,however we can refuse him a liscence if he applys , because its not our test he failed .
,, Benn will registar with Albania , Australia or somewhere else , and Eddie will still promte the fight probably in Dubai , stating its too big for the UK anyway
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
This stinks.
As we all predicted, he’s going to BS his way out of it with waffle, technicalities and legal bluffs.
Basically, if you can afford good lawyers you can get out of anything. Even failed drug tests.
One rule for the privileged, one rule for everybody else - even in what is meant to be the most honest sport in the world.
And arguably our most high profile promoter is going to back him up.
As we all predicted, he’s going to BS his way out of it with waffle, technicalities and legal bluffs.
Basically, if you can afford good lawyers you can get out of anything. Even failed drug tests.
One rule for the privileged, one rule for everybody else - even in what is meant to be the most honest sport in the world.
And arguably our most high profile promoter is going to back him up.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16765
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
I don't remember Fury getting this much heat when he failed his test.
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
Wonder if he'll have to come back clean. And be mediocre again.
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022
That absolutely stinks as well.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑17 Dec 2022, 20:24 I don't remember Fury getting this much heat when he failed his test.
Completely brushed under the carpet. Particularly the farmers retraction then reinstatement of his back up story.