Not at all, why? Smith was a light middleweight, Eubank was a big middleweight and both were around the same level - I expected Eubank to use his jab, movement, superior reach and movement to do what he did. What Smith did to him surprised me far more than what Eubank did last night.Ezzard wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 09:04 Smith barely threw a punch. Great for Eubank. But you cannot possibly say he wasn't compromised.
All the people saying last night was what they were expecting for the first fight are being a little dishonest.
Nobody predicted that Eubank would win every round and that Smith's output would be so low.
Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
-
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 13690
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
-
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 13690
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Then he should have pulled out. - I don't see how the weight loss is a factor though when that was down to Smith to monitor that and didn't he talk about the second fight being at 157lbs? At the aftermath of the first fight, he was saying if there was a rematch then he might ask for it at that weight.stevec@france wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 09:01he wasnt fit to fight ...Coco wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 08:54 One of the things about being a pro is sucking up injuries, almost everyone is carrying something
Look at the stick JC got, and FW only put up with it because Calzaghe was so good.
The likes of Smith tend to get frozen out if they don't fight.
He made the weight and was fit, you gotta fight
And said so himself afterwards too much quick weight loss / couldnt move / his corner screaming instruction to throw and he couldnt .
The back/feet then fine - have a third fight at 168lbs and then that will stop the alibis.
-
- Super Flyweight
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
I think Junior is getting an unfair bit of stick here.
He is a decent level operator (not elite) who has maximised his earning potential. He works hard, typically conducts himself well and has been in some decent fights.
I get the criticism of his call outs and the constant messing around with trainers/styles - but overall British Boxing is better off for having him.
Last night he put it all together. I don’t think enough recognition is given to the fact that in addition to draining weight for Benn he lost his brother in the build up to the last fight.
It’s also to his credit that he never used that as an excuse.
He is a decent level operator (not elite) who has maximised his earning potential. He works hard, typically conducts himself well and has been in some decent fights.
I get the criticism of his call outs and the constant messing around with trainers/styles - but overall British Boxing is better off for having him.
Last night he put it all together. I don’t think enough recognition is given to the fact that in addition to draining weight for Benn he lost his brother in the build up to the last fight.
It’s also to his credit that he never used that as an excuse.
-
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 13690
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Exactly, it was an excellent win for him last night.Frostieballs wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 09:27 I think Junior is getting an unfair bit of stick here.
He is a decent level operator (not elite) who has maximised his earning potential. He works hard, typically conducts himself well and has been in some decent fights.
I get the criticism of his call outs and the constant messing around with trainers/styles - but overall British Boxing is better off for having him.
Last night he put it all together. I don’t think enough recognition is given to the fact that in addition to draining weight for Benn he lost his brother in the build up to the last fight.
It’s also to his credit that he never used that as an excuse.

-
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4379
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Smith and Shalom should hang their heads.
Putting on huge PPV fight when they knew the condition, or lack of it, he was in.
Simply a cash out for Smith. We'll not see him again in a big fight unless they throw him a bone for a rubber match
Easy money at the bookies at least
Putting on huge PPV fight when they knew the condition, or lack of it, he was in.
Simply a cash out for Smith. We'll not see him again in a big fight unless they throw him a bone for a rubber match
Easy money at the bookies at least
-
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Groves did an interview this morning on this, advising all young boxers to invest in the full high top boots.gregregegg wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 07:49agree, coms were talking about his right ankle, i saw him roll his left a couple times. afterwards he mentoned dodgey ankles (not an injury just shit anckles).... Why not have super tight laced high ankle boots then... very weird all of it.
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Good advice, Smith should know better.642368 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 10:03Groves did an interview this morning on this, advising all young boxers to invest in the full high top boots.gregregegg wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 07:49agree, coms were talking about his right ankle, i saw him roll his left a couple times. afterwards he mentoned dodgey ankles (not an injury just shit anckles).... Why not have super tight laced high ankle boots then... very weird all of it.
-
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Surely a candidate for worst PPV of all time. I wouldn't bother dissecting the undercard but even the main event was a farce with one man refusing to throw or engage most likely injured.
Time for Sky to leave Boxing and stop conning fans these PPVs and shows are a disgrace.
Time for Sky to leave Boxing and stop conning fans these PPVs and shows are a disgrace.
-
- Middleweight
- Posts: 28913
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
There’s been so many terrible PPVs, they’re almost never worth the money and haven’t been for years. Anyone who still pays for them at this point is a total sucker.
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Yes I know what you mean. Both over priced because of a name that's gone back years. Trenchers was owned by the Foster family in the 80s. They don't run it now so the name is being used to sell food. Don't know anything about Magpie but again it's nothing flash.Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 07:47I'm on about the chip shops. The Magpie one next to their main restaurant and Trenchers the other side of the swing bridge.
-
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
The Magpie fish and chip shop isn't that pricey compared to other places on the coast.MasterG wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 11:36Yes I know what you mean. Both over priced because of a name that's gone back years. Trenchers was owned by the Foster family in the 80s. They don't run it now so the name is being used to sell food. Don't know anything about Magpie but again it's nothing flash.Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 07:47I'm on about the chip shops. The Magpie one next to their main restaurant and Trenchers the other side of the swing bridge.
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 11:22 There’s been so many terrible PPVs, they’re almost never worth the money and haven’t been for years. Anyone who still pays for them at this point is a total sucker.

Always on YouTube within a couple of hours max anyway .
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Thats where I watched it.rd350lc wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 12:47Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 11:22 There’s been so many terrible PPVs, they’re almost never worth the money and haven’t been for years. Anyone who still pays for them at this point is a total sucker.![]()
Always on YouTube within a couple of hours max anyway .
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Annoying that he mentioned triple G and Brook. Would rather see him go after Lara or Janibek for a strap
-
- Middleweight
- Posts: 19524
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Interesting to see if Eubank keeps the jab in his repertoire, surely he must, added so much more to his game
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Well I just judged the whole card is all. I try and find positives. And on a PPV the whole card counts for those of us where the money is important and some sort of value is hoped for.
And the first two hours were pretty bad mate. And the gaps between fights were looong

So yeah, a couple of good ones on the card, but for a PPV, and based on the last couple of PPVs I've grudgingly paid for, it was a bit crap.
-
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
I enjoyed the card. PPVs are rarely VFM but £20 isn't much these days compared to cinema and so on. 3/4 hours of boxing. Gaps we too long I get. I really enjoyed the Cullen fight. Marku fight was good albeit short. Clarke fight was disappointing and quite frankly bizarre. And I was really surprised in a good way by Eubank.
-
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 77669
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Had he mentioned Lara or Janibek, the crowd wouldn’t have reacted.
The crowd last night are fully aware or Brook and GGG.
Eubank isn’t worried too much about belts. He’s a money man. He wants money fights.
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Can only say Kiwi that I didn't pay for it and that probably puts a different perspective on it .KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 15:01Well I just judged the whole card is all. I try and find positives. And on a PPV the whole card counts for those of us where the money is important and some sort of value is hoped for.
And the first two hours were pretty bad mate. And the gaps between fights were looong![]()
So yeah, a couple of good ones on the card, but for a PPV, and based on the last couple of PPVs I've grudgingly paid for, it was a bit crap.
Don't know what it costs in your country, but the yanks get stung big time .
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
something dfinetly off about Smith last night but heh , Eubank can only beat whats in front of him ,Smith did'nt box anywhere near his abilities , but Eubank boxed a lot better than he has been recently , something just seemed wrong with smiths legs , like they were not working all wobbly , which makes it a hard ponderous slow slug for him ,, will we see number 3 .
-
- Lightweight
- Posts: 2901
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
"This is obviously Chris' night. I had my night in January," Smith said. "I'm not taking nothing away from Chris this time round. This is his night." ....but....but...but :lol:
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Cost a slab, or 24 bottles of beer or 7 loaves or regular bread, or 3 people to the movies. So quite a bit.rd350lc wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 15:50Can only say Kiwi that I didn't pay for it and that probably puts a different perspective on it .KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 15:01Well I just judged the whole card is all. I try and find positives. And on a PPV the whole card counts for those of us where the money is important and some sort of value is hoped for.
And the first two hours were pretty bad mate. And the gaps between fights were looong![]()
So yeah, a couple of good ones on the card, but for a PPV, and based on the last couple of PPVs I've grudgingly paid for, it was a bit crap.
Don't know what it costs in your country, but the yanks get stung big time .
-
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
I suspect Eubank was on the juice here.
Re: Round-by-Round: Liam Smith vs. Chris Eubank Jr. II - 2 September 2023
Think its fair to say Eubank boxed very well , different boxer when he's not doing a RJJ impersonation ,, but unfortunatly it was diluted by the fact Smith boxed shit , thats if you could say he even boxed at all , has opposed to just going in there fumbling around on slow ponderous legs that would'nt work .
If theres any critism it should be thrown excatly where it deserves to be thrown , and thats at Smith , his camp and the promoter , its obvious to anyone with half a brain it was'nt weight loss it was an injury , he was getting hammered from the start even if it was weight loss and fatigue kicking in he would of been OK FOR THE FIRST FEW RNDS then died .
So to go in with an injury to a PPV , tells us winning was'nt his biggest concern a payday was , it also tells us that this promoter does'nt give a shit about the paying public , he puts a night of shite fights on , i mean look at the Allen fight , talk about showing up for a exhibition , but then cultimates it with a obviously injured fighter taking a hiding to save his show and get a payday .
Once again British boxing at its best ,, alls i can say is thank god for streams , and firesticks , so i don't ever pay for the shite , and whatsmore i don't feel bad about it , what would happen if all that stream , payed instead , would it generate more money and better fights , would it bollocks just generate bigger profits ,
I do pay for the occasional one but there always , fights i really don't want to risk a stream going down and are very very rarely british fights . boxing is in dire straights all my local pubs DO NOT put the fights on anymore , managers have told me they always run at a loss with boxing , MMA different story there on all the time
If theres any critism it should be thrown excatly where it deserves to be thrown , and thats at Smith , his camp and the promoter , its obvious to anyone with half a brain it was'nt weight loss it was an injury , he was getting hammered from the start even if it was weight loss and fatigue kicking in he would of been OK FOR THE FIRST FEW RNDS then died .
So to go in with an injury to a PPV , tells us winning was'nt his biggest concern a payday was , it also tells us that this promoter does'nt give a shit about the paying public , he puts a night of shite fights on , i mean look at the Allen fight , talk about showing up for a exhibition , but then cultimates it with a obviously injured fighter taking a hiding to save his show and get a payday .
Once again British boxing at its best ,, alls i can say is thank god for streams , and firesticks , so i don't ever pay for the shite , and whatsmore i don't feel bad about it , what would happen if all that stream , payed instead , would it generate more money and better fights , would it bollocks just generate bigger profits ,
I do pay for the occasional one but there always , fights i really don't want to risk a stream going down and are very very rarely british fights . boxing is in dire straights all my local pubs DO NOT put the fights on anymore , managers have told me they always run at a loss with boxing , MMA different story there on all the time