Why? I'd like to hear your rationale. Not necessarily for arguments sake, I just don't really understand how you can look at Fury's recent record and have him at number 2 given Klitschko was ages ago, Wilder has been proven a fraud, nobody seems to rate Whyte and there has been absolutely nothing worthwhile in the past 2 years.gilgamesh wrote: ↑28 May 2024, 01:31 I'd still consider Fury the #2 guy behind only Usyk for the time being. A 2nd loss to Usyk or anyone else for that matter would undoubtedly drop him in the rankings. Inactivity would as well. Especially if the other top guys pick up more marquee wins while he's just on the shelf.
Also, I can understand thinking he's the second best, but that doesn't really translate to the rankings.