Adam Smith

Post Reply
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Adam Smith

Post by Deserter »

I've been vocal here in the past about not rating him remotely as a commentator and how I also, based on knowing the crowd he ran with an university, had a high degree of scepticism about how genuine his passion was for boxing (at the time I believed it was a first rung on the ladder for him to get into TV and he'd move on pretty swiftly).
So, my view is that if you're going to say these things on the forum, it's equally important to be honest if your view has changed. I'll never been a fan of his style on the mic, but I read his article in this week's BN and his love for the sport and the scene really shone through in a piece that I for one really enjoyed reading.
Everyone's carrying a bit of extra scar tissue as the years go by and the feature possibly took on an extra poignancy given what he's been through over the past year or two. I genuinely hope he's in a better place now and is able to secure a long-term role in the sport, whatever form that takes.
Kudos to BN for giving him the platform as well.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9632
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Adam Smith

Post by SeanBrennan »

Deserter wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 14:41 I've been vocal here in the past about not rating him remotely as a commentator and how I also, based on knowing the crowd he ran with an university, had a high degree of scepticism about how genuine his passion was for boxing (at the time I believed it was a first rung on the ladder for him to get into TV and he'd move on pretty swiftly).
So, my view is that if you're going to say these things on the forum, it's equally important to be honest if your view has changed. I'll never been a fan of his style on the mic, but I read his article in this week's BN and his love for the sport and the scene really shone through in a piece that I for one really enjoyed reading.
Everyone's carrying a bit of extra scar tissue as the years go by and the feature possibly took on an extra poignancy given what he's been through over the past year or two. I genuinely hope he's in a better place now and is able to secure a long-term role in the sport, whatever form that takes.
Kudos to BN for giving him the platform as well.
excellent post this, I really enjoyed the article too and his love for the sport shone through didn't it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Counter-puncher »

THERE'S THE RESPECT
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Deserter »

Counter-puncher wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 14:54 THERE'S THE RESPECT
:lol: :lol: :TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Counter-puncher »

Sorry couldn't resist
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Deserter »

Counter-puncher wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 14:58 Sorry couldn't resist
Don’t worry mate, I set myself up for that one and it genuinely made me chuckle as soon as I saw it!
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4477
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Adam Smith

Post by dookus »

I don't doubt his deep and sincere love for the sport, but he will always be for me a uniquely terrible commentator
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6629
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Adam Smith

Post by THEBUTCH »

Not wishing him any ill-will away from boxing, but professional boxing ultimately suffered at the hands of Smith's involvement in the sport.

He accelerated the circus, trampled over well established traditions and IMO caused boxing a lot of harm.

He should have never been more than a so-so commentator. That's the best thing I can say about him unfortunately.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Yeah seems a very nice & decent guy with an obvious love of boxing and respect for the fighters, and also did a reasonable job as head of boxing for Sky (maybe didn't always seem like it at the time, but just loom how awful it's been since he left). Certainly not a good commentator by any means so he ended up getting more flack than most, but can't really blame him for giving it a go, clearly a passion project for him.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22983
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Adam Smith

Post by handsofstone »

Counter-puncher wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 14:54 THERE'S THE RESPECT
:lol: :lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22983
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Adam Smith

Post by handsofstone »

I read Adam's book Beautiful Brutality on holiday years ago, he's a proper boxing man, always had a soft spot for him
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Controversial »

I could never really see why he got so much hate, seems like a nice enough fella. Like anyone working for a big media organisation like Sky he will have to toe the line.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Adam Smith

Post by maverick23 »

THEBUTCH wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 15:21 Not wishing him any ill-will away from boxing, but professional boxing ultimately suffered at the hands of Smith's involvement in the sport.

He accelerated the circus, trampled over well established traditions and IMO caused boxing a lot of harm.

He should have never been more than a so-so commentator. That's the best thing I can say about him unfortunately.
What do you mean by the following mate… ‘trampled over well established traditions and IMO caused boxing a lot of harm.’? Have you got any examples?
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Adam Smith

Post by garethhop »

I think it was wrong for him as Head of Boxing to be the commentating lead. Took away a lot of objectivity.

As a person and boxing fan/writer I've got loads of respect for him and hope he is doing well.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Adam Smith

Post by ALI »

Unlike many on here, i've never had a problem with him. His commentating and interviews were ok in my book. I've never been one to overly pay attention to an interviewer/commentator unless i find them annoying, so i guess he never annoyed me.
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Adam Smith

Post by cormack »

ALI wrote: 09 Jun 2024, 08:20 Unlike many on here, i've never had a problem with him. His commentating and interviews were ok in my book. I've never been one to overly pay attention to an interviewer/commentator unless i find them annoying, so i guess he never annoyed me.
ditto

whilst sarni really gets up my nose and should be horsewhipped
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9632
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Adam Smith

Post by SeanBrennan »

I've always liked him as his Sky commentary brings back great memories if being a kid watching boxing. Ditto Jim Watt's voice.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3335
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Deserter wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 14:41 I've been vocal here in the past about not rating him remotely as a commentator and how I also, based on knowing the crowd he ran with an university, had a high degree of scepticism about how genuine his passion was for boxing (at the time I believed it was a first rung on the ladder for him to get into TV and he'd move on pretty swiftly).
So, my view is that if you're going to say these things on the forum, it's equally important to be honest if your view has changed. I'll never been a fan of his style on the mic, but I read his article in this week's BN and his love for the sport and the scene really shone through in a piece that I for one really enjoyed reading.
Everyone's carrying a bit of extra scar tissue as the years go by and the feature possibly took on an extra poignancy given what he's been through over the past year or two. I genuinely hope he's in a better place now and is able to secure a long-term role in the sport, whatever form that takes.
Kudos to BN for giving him the platform as well.
What crowd was that?
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

dookus wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 15:18 I don't doubt his deep and sincere love for the sport, but he will always be for me a uniquely terrible commentator
Agreed. He ruined fights with his annoying commentary again and again and I lost count of the times I had to mute it and miss out on the atmosphere. For me, I will always hate the pr*ck for that. He kept doing a job he was completely sh*t at and didn't seem to give two f*cks that he was ruining fights. He seemed drunk on his power as head of boxing and loved the commentary job and being a big shot. I have zero respect for him whatsoever. Yes he likes boxing and is a nice guy, this entire forum is full of chaps like that and we didn't get flown around the world on a hefty salary. Ruining boxing fights with his awful commentary. I'll never like the chap or give him any credit at all, sorry.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Controversial »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 09 Jun 2024, 12:31
dookus wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 15:18 I don't doubt his deep and sincere love for the sport, but he will always be for me a uniquely terrible commentator
For me, I will always hate the pr*ck for that. He kept doing a job he was completely sh*t at and didn't seem to give two f*cks that he was ruining fights. He seemed drunk on his power as head of boxing and loved the commentary job and being a big shot. I have zero respect for him whatsoever. we didn't get flown around the world on a hefty salary.
Bloody hell that's a big harsh isn't it lol. He got the job so going around the world is a perk of that, you can't begrudge him that. I can't imagine it's easy commentating live, you have to make it mildly entertaining and not be umming and aarghing, repeating yourself etc.. He's a good talker but no one will be liked by 100% of the viewers no matter how great they are, I wouldn't fancy trying it and sure I'd say something stupid at one point and get forever slated for it :lol:
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6629
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Adam Smith

Post by THEBUTCH »

maverick23, to be honest I'm going to struggle to muster a clear reply to back up my statements because it was such a long time ago that I subscribed to Skysports, but apart from Sky's low quality, poor value boxing output Smith was in his pomp at that time and I'd become very jaded by his involvement.

I suppose where Smith clearly liked to turn things into a circus and also embracing women's boxing to the extent that he did....that is flouting tradition. I'm sure if I was to live through those years again I'd be able to detail things a lot better...but I couldn't bear the thought of reliving that oderous little cretin's antics TBH. As I say, this relates to him & boxing...no idea what he's like away from boxing and have no interest either.

Sometimes you will notice that punters moan about things, but keep coming back for more....not me. I ended up absolutely hating his presence & influence in boxing and cancelled my subscription.

Anyone who employs Johnny Nelson for presenting & punditry needs their head examining ! :doh:

He took things in a different direction probably to attract new fans, so again, moving away from what traditional boxing fans might expect.

For someone who is known for wheeling out the tired, worn out phrase "and there's the respect" him & Nelson were, IMO, just untalented shit stirring buffoons :witzend:
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Flump »

Good to see him staying involved, he's definitely a fan, seems like a nice chap and was seemingly good as a Head of department. But as a commentator, awful. Couldn't seemingly read a fight. You get sports generalists like Darren Fletcher and Dave Farrer who you instantly feel that they know what they are watching, Adam just never seemed to 'get it'
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Fray Bentos »

Back in the nineties, he was commentating on Sky on a mate of mines fight - 6 rounds, mate had to come in under 140 whereas his opponent came in at around 154 plus on the day, same old gameplaying crap, he entered the ring against what Nobby Nobbs would call a 'flying machine' and would proceed to get cuffed around for six rounds without anything exciting happening with the hometown boy getting the nod. Typical journeyman tale. Well, that night, Adam Smith was commentating the fight and he was very dismissive of my pal and in the last round he goes 'xyz is going to take his purse back to his hometown of abc and think himself lucky after this abysmal performance etc' and at the time I thought who the hell is this posh wanker saying all this crap about my mate, who was an honest pro who came into the ring in shape and ready to fight only to fight in 'mess abouts' (where the winner is already decided - usually against stablemates) or like here where he was up against it with everything - Smith has never laced a pair of gloves in his life - who the hell is he? I thought.

Then around about five years later, I read a book about Naseem Hamed where Smith was in a limo with Hamed, Warren and one or two others in Las Vegas - I forget now but it was about Hamed being a prick and reducing Smith to tears - and then I felt sorry for him, that Smith had to suffer such indignities around such people to earn a living, I am sure there would be many other ways for Smith to earn a good living but he stuck at it - would you want to deal with the wankers in boxing with the likes of Hamed reducing you to tears? I wouldn't - but he did - he stuck at it. It was probably reading that story where my thoughts changed about him that he might love the sport - I don't know if he respects honest journeymen and pros - probably not - a lot of people posting on here don't! He isn't on his own but I am sure he loves boxing.

30 years later, I am happy and glad that he has won his latest battles, in life we all win and lose battles - Smith, my mate (who has a great life post-retirement and has done a lot of things) me, you - good luck to him! If people are around long enough and we get to see a more broader picture, we can easily change our opinions about them.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Adam Smith

Post by stujones »

With Adam Smith - it seems to be a case of "you don't know what you've got till its gone". He's had his fair share of criticisms, but the alternatives aren't great and then you realise he wasn't so bad.

A bit like Jim Watt, although I could never understand the criticism of Jim - he was far an away the best co commentator ever - the true GOAT.
nobleart1978
Welterweight
Posts: 722
Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18

Re: Adam Smith

Post by nobleart1978 »

Annoying bloke. He genuinely gives me the creeps, especially when he stares directly into the camera. Weird guy.
Post Reply