I used to say Lewis used dirty tactics against Bruno but I was wrong, someone pointed out that Lewis had Bruno out with a left hook that put Bruno in dire trouble - which is true so I retract everything Ive said about the fight as Lewis though outjabbed badly beat Bruno fair and square.J-C wrote:No offense RazorKO, but I can predict exactly when you'll show up on a thread and exactly what you'll say, it getting somewhat tedious.RazorKO wrote:Holmes and Liston had far better jabs than Lewis, Lewis pawed with his so called 'jab' and if his jab was so effective how comes he was outjabbed badly by Mercer? The same Mercer who who completly outjabbed by a 42 year old Holmes, or what about an old Holyfied in their rematch?. Lewis also was outjabbed by Bruno and even failing to get friggin Briggs of him, not even mentioning where instead of using his jab to fend off fighters like an old, shot, unprepared, unmotived Tyson he held them instead.ringsider wrote:Holmes could jab, but that was about it, he threw it too hard most of the time. Liston's jab was was clubber. Just because a fighter has a hard jab, doesn't make it a great jab. You jab too hard, you mess up your balance, and ability to follow with the right and a decent hook. Jabbing is about setting up your other punches. You can't be trying to knock a guy's block off with every jab.
Ali had a better jab
Joe Louis
Lennox Lewis.
Riddick Bowe even!
Tyson(before he forgot what a jab was)
Ezzard Charles
Even George Foreman jabbed decent when he turned it down a bit. He used it to set everything up, ala Micheal Moore....
If Lewis had a jab the least he would could of done is to use it against this dreadful version of Tyson but he was incapable of doing so and proceeded to turn this fight into a wedding ceremony, if it could be any fight where Tyson was to loose his mentality - It would of been this fight and one has to admire Tyson for controlling his temper after being hugged to death for 8 rounds. The Tua fight was also as pittiful.
You've brought up Lewis' "dirty tactics" vs Bruno several times, while at the same time excusing all the stuff Tyson has pulled of the years. Now not only are we supposed to forgive Tyson his past fouls but actually commend him when he doesn't foul.
You compalin about Lewis' fans being disrespectful to Ruddock and then talk about how Ruddock should have been "whiping Lewis' brains off his gloves" which is more disrespectful?
Though Lewis definetly used tactics which has been on par with Tyson i.e holding Michael Grants head down into position than uppercuting him.
All I mean by that is that if the fight would taken place anywhere apart from London, than Ruddock would of knocked Lewis out very brutally. As much as I dislike Lewis the man, I respect Lewis the fighter but he isnt as great as people point him out. But the fans during this fight was just dreadful, one of the worst Ive ever seen not only in boxing history, but in the history of sport.and then talk about how Ruddock should have been "whiping Lewis' brains off his gloves" which is more disrespectful?