Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195
Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195
This would be the younger,fresher Saad,not the tired,past his prime shell.Saad was an underrated boxer,but he could box.His wars are what he was known for.You know this would be a "fight of the year" fight.Again,I think Holyfield "may" have an edge in speed,a little in size,but everything else equal.Saad would come out using that very good jab that he had when he did use it,with Holyfield applying pressure.After a couple of rounds like this,Saad HAS to take the invitation to brawl,and things get atomic.They go back and forth,slugging it out,in a fast paced war.I like Holyfield,but my heart likes Saad(maybe on account of having seen him do the things that earned him the name "Miracle Matthew).Saad takes a close decision,and before they leave the ring,a rematch is already being talked about,
zuru
zuru
Re: Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195
Like I said,I like Holyfield,but my heart goes w/Saad.I know more than likely Holyfield would take this,but a Saad fan can dream can't he.What i liked about Holyfield,was his combinations,which he threw like he was a middleweight.Sure his heart,and slugfests were impressive,but it was his skills that made a fan out of me.He had good speed,excellent coordination/combinations,a good chin,and stamina.He could get down,when he had to.I liked him skillwise better at Cruiser,when he could use those advantages that were somewhat negated at heavy.So like many of you,I put up fights that I would like to see,but give an admittedly(sometimes stupid)biased account as to what I think would happen.So realistically,I think he'd take Saad,maybe Spinks(you have to keep in mind Spinks awkwardness,as well as his skills),but Marciano takes him,no clowning,zuru wrote:This would be the younger,fresher Saad,not the tired,past his prime shell.Saad was an underrated boxer,but he could box.His wars are what he was known for.You know this would be a "fight of the year" fight.Again,I think Holyfield "may" have an edge in speed,a little in size,but everything else equal.Saad would come out using that very good jab that he had when he did use it,with Holyfield applying pressure.After a couple of rounds like this,Saad HAS to take the invitation to brawl,and things get atomic.They go back and forth,slugging it out,in a fast paced war.I like Holyfield,but my heart likes Saad(maybe on account of having seen him do the things that earned him the name "Miracle Matthew).Saad takes a close decision,and before they leave the ring,a rematch is already being talked about,
zuru
zuru
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5348
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
-
Eric the Viking
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1354
- Joined: 03 Apr 2003, 21:40
It's funny,I was just thinking of that,A beats B,who beat C,so naturally A should beat C,right?But usually C proceeds to whale the tar out of A,in these scenarios.Eric the Viking wrote:Not close - in this case "A beat B and B beat C so A beats C" really does apply, with A = Holyfield, B = Qawi, C = Saad.