BoxRec

ERIC GUY wrote:I called him in my kind way, but told him this conversation was between us, and then he wrote what I told him about, I guess that sums him up!!

Eric, it's a shame that a budding friendship has faltered. I think it is Albert's loss. But don't give up on him just yet. I'm sure he'd appreciate another of your kind calls this weekend.

ERIC GUY wrote:I did say this call was between us both, and yet you put that up, your an idiot..

Albert really is an idiot!!

Any chance of anyone writing something about boxing now?

of course, what do you want to know#

Going back to the actual start of this thread can anyone please explain to me what the difference is between Ryan's attempt to earn a bit of bread and Mr Hatton's recent appearance ?
Apart from the £33,000 difference in fee of course.
Double standards.

I was thinking back to this post when i saw hatton on Wrestling
I dont see anything the amtter with it , all a bit of fun and publicity.

Hatton got slated on the other post aswell though by some folk

Its only a bit of entertainment

twenty six wrote:Going back to the actual start of this thread can anyone please explain to me what the difference is between Ryan's attempt to earn a bit of bread and Mr Hatton's recent appearance ?
Apart from the £33,000 difference in fee of course.
Double standards.

The difference is Gazmac that the BBB of C would not approve Rhodes participation.
Why was Hatton's approved ?

sorry mate i didnt know thats what you meant
i just thought you meant about folk slagging Ryan for taking part.

I didnt know about the non -approval thing

seems pretty stupid

But hey thats the Board for you

twenty six wrote:The difference is Gazmac that the BBB of C would not approve Rhodes participation.
Why was Hatton's approved ?

Well we'll say how they respond when they are formally asked for an explanation.