Page 5 of 5
Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 23:46
by hitman_hatton1
Autobarn wrote:no, it's the other way round.
anthony is better.
mark my words.

Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 07:44
by Autobarn
anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 08:19
by alexpaterson
I really like Bradley he is very adaptable and is a brilliant ring general, I think Khan would really struggle with Bradley as Bradley is good at getting inside and Khan isnt a good inside fighter, Bradley could bang away to body and head with his fast combo's. I reckon Bradley would win widely on points
Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 10:33
by hitman_hatton1
Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
anyone else think lamont is better?
intrigued what others think on this one.
for me anthony is better.
lamont is a pressure fighter with some decent skills.
anthony is more stand up boxer and a much better defensive fighter.
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 10:40
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!
At least you have stopped licking Hattons butt.
Merry Christmas!

Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 10:47
by hitman_hatton1
DG. wrote:hitman_hatton1 wrote:Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!
At least you have stopped licking Hattons butt.
Merry Christmas!

i've always been realistic about hatton.
i said he would be a world champion and he was.
so many doubted his abilities to even compete at that level.
the hall of fame will be on that phone to hatton in 5 or 6 yrs time.
mark my words.

Re: Timothy Bradley next in line for Amir Khan
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 10:55
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:DG. wrote:hitman_hatton1 wrote:
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!
At least you have stopped licking Hattons butt.
Merry Christmas!

the hall of fame will be on that phone to hatton in 5 or 6 yrs time.
mark my words.

Asking why he fought lots of smaller older men and why he got ktfo by PBF and Pac.
He shoud fight Bradley but I think he would get stopped.
Bradley KO 3
