Page 5 of 5

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:20
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
King Geedorah wrote:
leforge wrote:Is this fight on tv?
Yeah, Smigga versus Home of British Boxing is the chief support. My money is on the miserable git from Liverpool.
:lol: :lol: im up for it, you gonna promote me

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:35
by hurlock
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:
hurlock wrote:
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote: says the 1 who is always up smigga's arse..just because he posts on this forum :TU: or is it a liverpool thing :D
You really are thick.

Not only do you not understand what your writing....which can be tricky, but you dont even understand what your reading :lol:
A bloody statement aswell you clungemonkey :!: :!:

I dont like how smith comes across.I would have no pleasure in ever meeting the man down to it. ive never met anyone ive posted with, so i dont know how personalities come across online..... apart from your nan :OhYes:

WOW fukin ell braveheart.. i wud absolutely luv you to say that to my face, suk ur mum u faggit
so would i so i could punch you in it faggot & leave a nice mars on your boat you melt.

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:37
by el_grande_mauro_mina
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:
King Geedorah wrote:
leforge wrote:Is this fight on tv?
Yeah, Smigga versus Home of British Boxing is the chief support. My money is on the miserable git from Liverpool.
:lol: :lol: im up for it, you gonna promote me
For the 4 seconds it would last... :box:

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:39
by Jeff Thomas
hurlock wrote: so would i so i could punch you in it faggot & leave a nice mars on your boat you melt.
:lol:

You melt?

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:42
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
Carlos-Wigan wrote:
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:
King Geedorah wrote: Yeah, Smigga versus Home of British Boxing is the chief support. My money is on the miserable git from Liverpool.
:lol: :lol: im up for it, you gonna promote me
For the 4 seconds it would last... :box:
:lol: lets make it fair i fight with a baseball bat then :D

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:43
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
hurlock wrote:
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:
hurlock wrote: You really are thick.

Not only do you not understand what your writing....which can be tricky, but you dont even understand what your reading :lol:
A bloody statement aswell you clungemonkey :!: :!:

I dont like how smith comes across.I would have no pleasure in ever meeting the man down to it. ive never met anyone ive posted with, so i dont know how personalities come across online..... apart from your nan :OhYes:

WOW fukin ell braveheart.. i wud absolutely luv you to say that to my face, suk ur mum u faggit
so would i so i could punch you in it faggot & leave a nice mars on your boat you melt.
haha chill out old timer you wud get 1 bombed..melt? :lol: :lol: what a neek

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:53
by hurlock
old timer??? im 30 & a melt is another abbreviation of mug or wen someone swallows it like you :lol: we say" he melted"

anyhow i was gonna say pm your address & reply to meet round your nan's :lol: :wink:

i am joking about your nan by the way, i thought you may of been 40 & found it funny.

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 15 Jun 2010, 18:57
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
hurlock wrote:old timer??? im 30 & a melt is another abbreviation of mug or wen someone swallows it like you :lol: we say" he melted"

anyhow i was gonna say pm your address & reply to meet round your nan's :lol: :wink:

i am joking about your nan by the way, i thought you may of been 40 & found it funny.
thats old :lol: :lol: why wud i find it funny? i wud hav took it as a joke if u put a smiley face at de end of it. thought i was 40 lol im 19

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 16 Jun 2010, 17:34
by billy nelson
jBacca wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:its a belting good matchup bennie

really shows a lot of confidence, on FWank's part, in Smith.

I expect Simpson to bring out the best in him, and it goes without saying if Smith's anything less than the real deal he could be on the wrong end of this one.

I think, despite his spiteful punching, Swifty would do well not to get too involved in a row- though he definitely needs to get Simpson's respect.
I truly believe we'll get to see the potential Swifty has.

Speed will be key for him, and I'll be happy if he dances around Simpson for 12 rounds to take a near shut-out decision.

Cannae' wait.
ha ha your good ma man

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 16 Jun 2010, 17:42
by billy nelson
Bomber 1 wrote:Amateur background will also play a huge factor and Stephen Smith has been all round the world how many times over so don't be fooled into thinking that he won't be there when the going get's tough cos he will believe me.. When he get's in that ring he's one of the most competitive and most driven kids on planet earth.. He's so eagar to prove himself it's unreal.. This can't come soon enough for him, He demanded this match and that's why it's happening.. :TU:
Big man the same can be said for the Pro experience john's got,theres one thing fighting 10 SBW then fighting john simpson,wev'e trained brilliantly so far for this and imo if simpson can deal with ricky burn's speed he'll handle anyones over 12 hard hard rounds. smith is a very good fighter and he will need to be on the 17th beleive me.

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 16 Jun 2010, 17:54
by $wifty
billy nelson wrote:
Bomber 1 wrote:Amateur background will also play a huge factor and Stephen Smith has been all round the world how many times over so don't be fooled into thinking that he won't be there when the going get's tough cos he will believe me.. When he get's in that ring he's one of the most competitive and most driven kids on planet earth.. He's so eagar to prove himself it's unreal.. This can't come soon enough for him, He demanded this match and that's why it's happening.. :TU:
Big man the same can be said for the Pro experience john's got,theres one thing fighting 10 SBW then fighting john simpson,wev'e trained brilliantly so far for this and imo if simpson can deal with ricky burn's speed he'll handle anyones over 12 hard hard rounds. smith is a very good fighter and he will need to be on the 17th beleive me.
:TU: :TU: :TU: Cant wait!!! :bow:

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 16 Jun 2010, 18:05
by leforge
Is this fighting happening? If so is it on tv?

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 16 Jun 2010, 18:17
by Smigga
billy nelson wrote:
Bomber 1 wrote:Amateur background will also play a huge factor and Stephen Smith has been all round the world how many times over so don't be fooled into thinking that he won't be there when the going get's tough cos he will believe me.. When he get's in that ring he's one of the most competitive and most driven kids on planet earth.. He's so eagar to prove himself it's unreal.. This can't come soon enough for him, He demanded this match and that's why it's happening.. :TU:
Big man the same can be said for the Pro experience john's got,theres one thing fighting 10 SBW then fighting john simpson,wev'e trained brilliantly so far for this and imo if simpson can deal with ricky burn's speed he'll handle anyones over 12 hard hard rounds. smith is a very good fighter and he will need to be on the 17th beleive me.
Just what we want to hear Billy, no fighter will have any excuses ;)

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 04:28
by billy nelson
Smigga wrote:
billy nelson wrote:
Bomber 1 wrote:Amateur background will also play a huge factor and Stephen Smith has been all round the world how many times over so don't be fooled into thinking that he won't be there when the going get's tough cos he will believe me.. When he get's in that ring he's one of the most competitive and most driven kids on planet earth.. He's so eagar to prove himself it's unreal.. This can't come soon enough for him, He demanded this match and that's why it's happening.. :TU:
Big man the same can be said for the Pro experience john's got,theres one thing fighting 10 SBW then fighting john simpson,wev'e trained brilliantly so far for this and imo if simpson can deal with ricky burn's speed he'll handle anyones over 12 hard hard rounds. smith is a very good fighter and he will need to be on the 17th beleive me.
Just what we want to hear Billy, no fighter will have any excuses ;)
defo mate,really looking forward to this,then down to defend our football title the next week ha ha see you soon!

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 04:30
by billy nelson
$wifty wrote:
billy nelson wrote:
Bomber 1 wrote:Amateur background will also play a huge factor and Stephen Smith has been all round the world how many times over so don't be fooled into thinking that he won't be there when the going get's tough cos he will believe me.. When he get's in that ring he's one of the most competitive and most driven kids on planet earth.. He's so eagar to prove himself it's unreal.. This can't come soon enough for him, He demanded this match and that's why it's happening.. :TU:
Big man the same can be said for the Pro experience john's got,theres one thing fighting 10 SBW then fighting john simpson,wev'e trained brilliantly so far for this and imo if simpson can deal with ricky burn's speed he'll handle anyones over 12 hard hard rounds. smith is a very good fighter and he will need to be on the 17th beleive me.
:

:TU: :TU: :TU: Cant wait!!! :bow:
:bag: see you soon swifty!
:bag: :bag:

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 04:40
by Jeff Thomas
Credit to both camps its gonna be a wicked fight.

Re: smith v simpson

Posted: 20 Jun 2010, 13:09
by Neri
That's the problem with these forums. You get the fighters coming on and you then get one or two posters who likes to throw insults at them and be disrespectful to them. The fighters can do without all that, so they get off and we lose loads of opinions and insight that really matter. :witzend:

Shannon Briggs posted on the current scene once and he never came back because he just got a load of abuse from a load of clowns.