Page 5 of 8

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:41
by hitman09
Any chance you could get back to discussing boxing, ladies? The incessant bitching is unseemly.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 15:17
by Bricks
amen to that

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 18:20
by Goodnight, Irene
mugabi wrote:amen to that
Yeah, because you haven't contributed at all to what he's talking about. Idiot :lol:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 18:50
by Raff The Frenchman
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote:amen to that
Yeah, because you haven't contributed at all to what he's talking about. Idiot :lol:
Says the one who started bitching about grammar.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 18:58
by boswell perkins
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote:amen to that
Yeah, because you haven't contributed at all to what he's talking about. Idiot :lol:
ive been reading this section of the board all day and you know what sir?
You come across as a real bully .dude u should stfu and let those of us who want to talk boxing talk boxing.

My predictions:

larry holmes w12 bruno
larry holmes w 12 morrson
riddick bowe w12 holmes
lennox lewis tko 9 holmes
george foreman w12 larry holmes

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 20:28
by Goodnight, Irene
Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote:amen to that
Yeah, because you haven't contributed at all to what he's talking about. Idiot :lol:
Says the one who started bitching about grammar.
Except I'm not the one saying, "Amen," you absolute fvcking idiot. LOL. That's kind of critical to the whole issue I was pointing out. I shouldn't be astonished you overlooked that oh-so-obvious issue, but I guess, somehow, I am in awe of how you could. Unsurprisingly, your powers of deduction extend far beyond Boxing. You are utterly clueless --- in any language.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 20:29
by Goodnight, Irene
boswell perkins wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote:amen to that
Yeah, because you haven't contributed at all to what he's talking about. Idiot :lol:
ive been reading this section of the board all day and you know what sir?
You come across as a real bully .dude u should stfu and let those of us who want to talk boxing talk boxing.

My predictions:

larry holmes w12 bruno
larry holmes w 12 morrson
riddick bowe w12 holmes
lennox lewis tko 9 holmes
george foreman w12 larry holmes
Really? A whole day? Don't sell yourself short --- I think you've been around a lot longer than that, haven't you, Mugabi? Your facade is beyond transparent :lol:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 20:37
by Goodnight, Irene
Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote: Saad & I do have some pretty steep core differences on a few subjects, but I can't say I don't respect his views & the arguments he puts forth. More than can be said for a lot of others, in my view, but, then, that's why I'm the Forum pudendum in the eyes of so many, I suppose :lol:
Wow, I'm in a shock, others see you as "the forum pudendum"? man I really wonder why that is.
All great men know the taste of persecution. In all fairness, most of those people are from Current Scene --- much like your good self --- & there is a huge population on BoxRec who concur the place's knowledge is the laughing stock of the site.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 20:43
by SaadOffTheDeck
LOL, he was posting about every individuals all time posting history before he could have even read this single thread. He disagrees with Mugabi about Holmes/Morrison though. It couldn't possibly be him, :lol:

The fact that Mugabi carries on slinging insults for 3 pages and pretends he has nothing to do with it isn't lost on all of us.

I never pretend to be without fault. I am not good at letting trolling like Mugabi does pass and I certainly am opinionated and not above stirring things up. My sense of humor can come across as abrasive. I'm aware of all of this.

But this guy is just a rare breed of buffoon. He must have wrecked 15 cars today and I need to get a life. LOL

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 20:46
by Goodnight, Irene
mugabi wrote:I think its already well established you are the one who starts fights. Any reasonable person reading this and the other threads like the Czyz one can see that. In fact several have complained about you already but you choose to ignore the truth and defeat that is staring you in the face.

I will make the same offer to you again.
Stop trolling, stop abusing other members,let others have an opinion, put me on ignore, i will do the same and we need never converse again.

The same offer applies to Urineeie.

Put please dont start mimicking my lines, mimicking my advice to you, like you did in your last post, it makes you sound like the retarded little kid you are and its pretty pathetic

dont be like your namesake saddam . accept defeat with dignity. Because any further trolling posts you and your fellow keyboard bully make here will only add to your shameless defeat.

:lol:

Excuse me if I didn't understand that one clearly --- as I type this, I am guiding Air Force One through a good deal of turbulence, & the screen is uneven. What is, "Urineeie" supposed to articulate? I've seen you botch several attempts at this, now, so let me do the spelling for you. What you are mangling (not your fault I know, as you have to concentrate on driving through the streets Grand Theft Auto-style while simultaneously producing multi-paragraph responses --- God knows, none of us mere mortals could accomplish it) is the phrase, "Goodnight, Urine."

It isn't witty, or clever, & even Raffy is cringing at it in obligatory silence as we speak --- but at least now someone has articulated your backward attempt at parody properly. Excuse me for a moment while I pull her in for the landing.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 04:21
by Raff The Frenchman
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote: Saad & I do have some pretty steep core differences on a few subjects, but I can't say I don't respect his views & the arguments he puts forth. More than can be said for a lot of others, in my view, but, then, that's why I'm the Forum pudendum in the eyes of so many, I suppose :lol:
Wow, I'm in a shock, others see you as "the forum pudendum"? man I really wonder why that is.
All great men know the taste of persecution. In all fairness, most of those people are from Current Scene --- much like your good self --- & there is a huge population on BoxRec who concur the place's knowledge is the laughing stock of the site.
Wow...I wanted to make you look stupid, but you seem to be taking care of that yourself really well

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 05:56
by Bricks
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote:I think its already well established you are the one who starts fights. Any reasonable person reading this and the other threads like the Czyz one can see that. In fact several have complained about you already but you choose to ignore the truth and defeat that is staring you in the face.

I will make the same offer to you again.
Stop trolling, stop abusing other members,let others have an opinion, put me on ignore, i will do the same and we need never converse again.

The same offer applies to Urineeie.

Put please dont start mimicking my lines, mimicking my advice to you, like you did in your last post, it makes you sound like the retarded little kid you are and its pretty pathetic

dont be like your namesake saddam . accept defeat with dignity. Because any further trolling posts you and your fellow keyboard bully make here will only add to your shameless defeat.

:lol:

Excuse me if I didn't understand that one clearly --- as I type this, I am guiding Air Force One through a good deal of turbulence, & the screen is uneven. What is, "Urineeie" supposed to articulate? I've seen you botch several attempts at this, now, so let me do the spelling for you. What you are mangling (not your fault I know, as you have to concentrate on driving through the streets Grand Theft Auto-style while simultaneously producing multi-paragraph responses --- God knows, none of us mere mortals could accomplish it) is the phrase, "Goodnight, Urine."

It isn't witty, or clever, & even Raffy is cringing at it in obligatory silence as we speak --- but at least now someone has articulated your backward attempt at parody properly. Excuse me for a moment while I pull her in for the landing.
G'day Urineeie! Well I wouldnt expect someone of your convict background to have the education to understand my English.Its called the Queen's English Bruce!...... and since when was Australia the world centre for good English!

Also thanks for sharing your airforceone fantasies with us, although I would guess your not currently stationed on a helicopter but rather the dunnie! sitting there racked by feelings of persucution and delusion about your crusade for better spoelling in boxing forums!

whoops i got some spoellings wrong again! please dont punish me by trolling me to forum hell for an eternity urineieee! I must hand it to you though, the way you always get your spellings right! You police these forums for grammer mistakes with all the precision and bigoted zeal of the taliban policing afghan women for not having full length beards!


You and your friend shall henceforth be known as the trolling taliban twosome on a crusade for better spelling on boxing forums everywhere!

Such an admirable worthwhile pursuit for two young retarded men!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 06:19
by Bricks
double post- hope that isnt a cardinal sin too, in the trolling talibans book of death for crimes against grammer on boxing forums! :DD

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 08:56
by BoxBuzz
for those of you in full tilt disagreeing and disagreeable mode PLEASE use the ignore feature and pay no attention to one another.

This is a very practical option UNLESS you are truly enjoying the bickering...then by all means continue to entertain the rest of us.........as long as you keep the language and temperment between the navigational beacons!



Thanks!

Buzz

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 09:10
by Bricks
BoxBuzz wrote:for those of you in full tilt disagreeing and disagreeable mode PLEASE use the ignore feature and pay no attention to one another.

This is a very practical option UNLESS you are truly enjoying the bickering...then by all means continue to entertain the rest of us.........as long as you keep the language and temperment between the navigational beacons!



Thanks!

Buzz
Buzz you just spelt temperament incorrectly :oo HOWL HOWL another valued member will now be trolled to death by the trolling taliban of boxing grammer!

How many more valuable people will we lose to Urineiees crusade for correct spelling at all times on a boxing forum. How long will it be before the BOTP forum is renamed Urineiee and Saddams Trolling Grammer Correction Facility.

I imagine the forum will be a bleaker place, suffering members will be forced to say George Foreman was a lousy infighter and Larry Holmes at 67 could beat Mike Tyson in 1991.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 09:11
by Bricks
BoxBuzz wrote:for those of you in full tilt disagreeing and disagreeable mode PLEASE use the ignore feature and pay no attention to one another.

This is a very practical option UNLESS you are truly enjoying the bickering...then by all means continue to entertain the rest of us.........as long as you keep the language and temperment between the navigational beacons!



Thanks!

Buzz
Seriously though! Thats understood! Thanks lets see if peace can be brokered with the trolling taliban. Maybe i should buy an Australian dictionary and rename my kids Charlene, Whacker,Bonzer, and Crocodile and teach them to say G'day every morning instead of good morning,and refer to the toilet as the dunnie. Is that fair dinkum urineieee? I'm sure you all agree Australian English is a far superior language to the English spoken and written by the British and Americans. Perhaps thats why Urineiee is so particular about the spelling of anyone who disagrees with him. Funny that he never corrects the spellings of those who agree with him, which granted is less people than you find on a dead drongo's dingo! While we're talking spelling lessons from Urineiee we could also start drinking ten tinnies of beer before breakfast it might help us get in the Australian frame of mind so that our spelling might be improved!

In the immortal words of Kylie Minogue "we should be so lucky, lucky, lucky , lucky!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 10:28
by SaadOffTheDeck
The embarrassment of Mugabi can stop as soon as he puts away his trolling gear. It's best for the safety of the roads anyway.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 10:31
by BoxBuzz
Mugabi, the temperament moment was merely bait. We do not judge nor do we issue warning citations for spelleng errirs.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 10:35
by SaadOffTheDeck
BoxBuzz wrote:Mugabi, the temperament moment was merely bait. We do not judge nor do we issue warning citations for spelleng errirs.

Your a scolar and a gentelman.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 10:47
by Bricks
BoxBuzz wrote:Mugabi, the temperament moment was merely bait. We do not judge nor do we issue warning citations for spelleng errirs.
LOl! lmfao looks like its already been taken up by one of the trolling taliban! Saddo where have you been I was worried you had drowned in the english channel while you were typing on here :lol:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 11:15
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Mugabi, the temperament moment was merely bait. We do not judge nor do we issue warning citations for spelleng errirs.
LOl! lmfao looks like its already been taken up by one of the trolling taliban! Saddo where have you been I was worried you had drowned in the english channel while you were typing on here :lol:

I'm sure you were, didn't take you long to get back to your trolling. Why don't you just start your on thread that you can start shit in? You can call it Mugabi's trollathon. I promise I'll check in once in a while. That way you can corner all of your obsessions in one thread instead of ruining one aftyer another. :TU:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 11:42
by gambler49
Wat Irene and Saad need to understand is that this is a Boxing forum and NOT a Writing and Literature Forum! I think every1 that posts on here can type there words well enuff to be readable so I don't see da problem. As far as GI goes I think it's just pompous arrogance. He seem to suffer from narcissism
and a need to try and correct other posters on their grammar and spelling. His attack on Raff was well outta order! But he looked bad in the process. Maybe this is just an act on his part, or maybe he really is like this in real life, either way he aint gonna change on this forum. But. I hope that other posters can see that his style is not the way to go. It's not clever! And also it aint even funny!
As for Saad I urge u2 repent and remove this pompous arrogance that u have in u.
As for Irene, if his style is just and act, then good 4 him.. If this is how he rly is then I pity him. He either don't have any friends, or he will be friendless inda future... 99.9% of peeps don't appreciate being looked down upon.
Listen to me wen I talk: U will meet many peeps in ur life, some will be smarter and some wont be as smart as u. But u DON'T jump on some1 and slag them! Unless of corse they ask 4 ur opinion.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 12:12
by SaadOffTheDeck
I never said a word about Mugabi's grammar until he said to me...."Your a retard".

As for my arrogance, you will just have to learn to live with that gambler. You really shouldn't be giving advice considering you responded to one of my fight predictions with "Ur full of crap".

Are you guys like 4 years old? I'm not even joking. All you do is argue and point fingers as to why it isn't your fault. It's quite pathetic.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 12:31
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I never said a word about Mugabi's grammar until he said to me...."Your a retard".

As for my arrogance, you will just have to learn to live with that gambler.Are you guys like 4 years old? I'm not even joking. All you do is argue and point fingers as to why it isn't your fault. It's quite pathetic.
LOL :lol: Quite how you could say that last paragraph with a straight face! Sad you really remind me so much of a young Mike Tyson in his serial buttocks fondling prime. Mike always protested it wasnt his hands fault and the more he protested the more victims came out to accuse him! Hhaha you really are the biggest laughing stock exceeding even your wife Urineieee!! LOL LMFAO! :OhYes:

PS dont worry about replying so quickly I know you and Urineiee are swimming in the english channel while your bothreading this, and at the same time talking to whales about why George Foreman was a terrible infighter!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 12:37
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I never said a word about Mugabi's grammar until he said to me...."Your a retard".

As for my arrogance, you will just have to learn to live with that gambler.Are you guys like 4 years old? I'm not even joking. All you do is argue and point fingers as to why it isn't your fault. It's quite pathetic.
LOL :lol: Quite how you could say that last paragraph with a straight face! Saddodick you really remind me so much of a young Mike Tyson in his serial buttocks fondling prime. Mike always protested it wasnt his hands fault and the more he protested the more victims came out to accuse him! Hhaha you really are the biggest laughing stock exceeding even your wife Urineieee!! LOL LMFAO! :OhYes:

PS dont worry about replying so quickly I know your swimming in the english channel while your reading this! I wouldnt want Urineiee to be made a widowed sheila! :lol: Gday!!
Quite the opposite, only a retard like yourself could try and pass blame to everyone else in a dump of a thread like this. I could let your insults slide, but I didn't. I'm equally to blame here. Though half of your forum posts are trolling me.

Are you even capable of an original thought? Why don't you just say, "I'm rubber and you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!" ?

I'm sure your threats of leaving the thread are as idle as the last time. Not sure why you think insulting Saad Muhammad's name hurts me. It just makes you look like the child you are. i'm actually shocked you haven't demanded a fist fight yet. Only a matter of time. I haven't had a broad after me like this in a minute.