BoxRec

Ian im hoping to meet him next week for a pint as im in Manc, ill let you know on the drugs front

This paraside ENDGAME sent me a PM and when I tried to reply it said he had "disabled private message receipt"

Arsehole. If you have the stones to send me an insulting PM then have the stones to listen to my reply.

Some absolute tools on here and it's getting worse.

Captain Hook wrote:This paraside ENDGAME sent me a PM and when I tried to reply it said he had "disabled private message receipt"

Arsehole. If you have the stones to send me an insulting PM then have the stones to listen to my reply.

Some absolute tools on here and it's getting worse.

1. My apologies, I wasn't aware that PM's were disabled, I will try amend then I can 'listen' to your reply (how does one 'listen' to a written message?)

2. My PM was not 'insulting' read it again please

3. 'Arsehole/tool' is there any need for such profanity?

4. What is a 'paraside' ?

Hope to hear from you soon, you're funny

The one time I make two grammatical errors and it's in response to this fuckwit....

God bless him :)

endgame wrote:

Captain Hook wrote:This paraside ENDGAME sent me a PM and when I tried to reply it said he had "disabled private message receipt"

Arsehole. If you have the stones to send me an insulting PM then have the stones to listen to my reply.

Some absolute tools on here and it's getting worse.

1. My apologies, I wasn't aware that PM's were disabled, I will try amend then I can 'listen' to your reply (how does one 'listen' to a written message?)

2. My PM was not 'insulting' read it again please

3. 'Arsehole/tool' is there any need for such profanity?

4. What is a 'paraside' ?

Hope to hear from you soon, you're funny

PS Can you justify your posts to other members. I find you pathetic, but then you've not targeted me.

Nosferatu for example. Relevance to this thread?

CH, can you end me the PM(s) please.

Captain Hook wrote: PS Can you justify your posts to other members. I find you pathetic, but then you've not targeted me.

Nosferatu for example. Relevance to this thread?

We are now required to 'justify' our posts, oh dear

You find me 'pathetic' that is your prerogative Sir, I suspect others concur

'Mr' McNeilly who started the thread, has an uncanny resemblance to said Nosferatu, 'Mr' McNeilly was in fact delighted by the comparison 'Cheers' he exclaimed, so why your outrage?

Vent your spleen elsewhere spirochete

endgame wrote:

Captain Hook wrote: PS Can you justify your posts to other members. I find you pathetic, but then you've not targeted me.

Nosferatu for example. Relevance to this thread?

We are now required to 'justify' our posts, oh dear

You find me 'pathetic' that is your prerogative Sir, I suspect others concur

'Mr' McNeilly who started the thread, has an uncanny resemblance to said Nosferatu, 'Mr' McNeilly was in fact delighted by the comparison 'Cheers' he exclaimed, so why your outrage?

Vent your spleen elsewhere spirochete

As you know bellendgame, I was being sarky.

Hooky...this is a TROLL. The mods will hopefully soon zap him.

lirva?

End game- why the hate? Here's ur chance let the hate out and goodness will flow through you like the rivers of zebedee

J wrote:lirva?

Not this time, I don't think mate. The mods have a separate file on Lirva as thick as the Yellow Pages

What I've realised is how much work the various mods on here get through actually, which none of you know about. They are incredibly fastidious with rules too, not allowing emotion to overrule their work.

See, with this silly pudendum, I'd just never, ever let someone back again who was deliberately dragging the place down for their own amusement and sending long time constructive posters like Captain Hook abusive PMs.

But they are much more objective than the likes of me. And long may it continue. But he'll get kicked off sooner rather than later should the needless needle continue.

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:

endgame wrote:

Captain Hook wrote: PS Can you justify your posts to other members. I find you pathetic, but then you've not targeted me.

Nosferatu for example. Relevance to this thread?

We are now required to 'justify' our posts, oh dear

You find me 'pathetic' that is your prerogative Sir, I suspect others concur

'Mr' McNeilly who started the thread, has an uncanny resemblance to said Nosferatu, 'Mr' McNeilly was in fact delighted by the comparison 'Cheers' he exclaimed, so why your outrage?

Vent your spleen elsewhere spirochete

As you know bellendgame, I was being sarky.

Hooky...this is a TROLL. The mods will hopefully soon zap him.

'Bellendgame' ... excellent that's almost as banal as your alliterative headline RE: Kell Brook

A troll, no not at all Nosferatu, not at all

You want the Mods to 'zap' me, tell you what I shall leave of my own volition don't want to cause any further upset on the good ship Boxrec

The Endgame signs off

endgame wrote:The Endgame signs off

Well at least he stayed around long enough to acquire that annoying characteristic of many current boxers and referred to himself in the third person

I honestly believe Kel Brook could be a massive star - but he could also very easily join the "what could have been" club if he doesnt keep his discipline.

Well, good for you. Just before you close the door (not that you will of course!), in the interests of clarity...

Re banality: a) the headline was supposed to be a parody of a tabloid headline because it was a tabloid story. It was deliberately banal. And funny to some, at least (on ESB, mind ). The fact you can't see that doesn't reflect well on your level of intelligence, despite the unfortunate, ill-judged air of superiority you seem to have taken upon yourself.

b) as for a little nickname for you, you seem to think you deserve something beyond the banal, which would again support the obvious theory that you have self-esteem problems

You go easy, now. And far.

Spud wrote:I honestly believe Kel Brook could be a massive star - but he could also very easily join the "what could have been" club if he doesnt keep his discipline.

i hear he is very disciplined in the gym, i agree he could be the bets britain have ot offer soon.

Ah, just one more thing, endgame.

I know who you are now. Not sure exactly what I've done to upset you. Last time we were in regular contact was in 2007 by email and everything was cordial...friendly even.

So, you are certainly not a troll. Or at least you weren't. Shame.

Metta

Ian

maybe he strarted drinking wkd DD

black panther wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Coco wrote:Common assault is barely even a crime, he must have hardly even touched him, I doubt he will get a punishment other than paying court costs

Not when your a licensed boxer, there was a boxer a couple of years ago working the doors, in London who hit a guy, sadley the guy died and he was jailed for life for murder. I know this is very diferent but the court will be a bit harder on him becasue of his proffesion. Hope he learns form it as he's a super talented fighter.

Yes I remember that, it was Garry Delaney. Don't thing he got life though, according to this article he got 11 years:

http://blog.thesweetscience.com/2006/07 ... ed-to-jail

Delaney was convicted of murder and given life with a reccomendation he serve at least 11 years.Its highly likely he will serve a few more.Its almost unheard of for a murderer to get their first parole.Its also unusual for a charge of murder to be brought in a "one punch" case.Being a boxer worked against him,he would almost certainly have been charged with manslaughter otherwise.

mickey1975 wrote:

black panther wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote: Not when your a licensed boxer, there was a boxer a couple of years ago working the doors, in London who hit a guy, sadley the guy died and he was jailed for life for murder. I know this is very diferent but the court will be a bit harder on him becasue of his proffesion. Hope he learns form it as he's a super talented fighter.

Yes I remember that, it was Garry Delaney. Don't thing he got life though, according to this article he got 11 years:

http://blog.thesweetscience.com/2006/07 ... ed-to-jail

Delaney was convicted of murder and given life with a reccomendation he serve at least 11 years.Its highly likely he will serve a few more.Its almost unheard of for a murderer to get their first parole.Its also unusual for a charge of murder to be brought in a "one punch" case.Being a boxer worked against him,he would almost certainly have been charged with manslaughter otherwise.

Didn't he walk off his door, and spray him with a substance before chinning him though? In which case though murder seems harsh would be more fitting then Manslaughter which i've always thought is accidental? Either way said for all involved. The doors are a horrible place.

For it to be murder would require intent,and that would usually involve a prolonged beating.

mickey1975 wrote:For it to be murder would require intent,and that would usually involve a prolonged beating.

Ah i see, very harsh

Emerson - I deleted the arsey ones sorry mate, but I see he's gone anyway....

As any of you Guys been to Barnsley !
I dont big up fighting in clubs, but its NEVER EVER wrong to clip a dingle.

Jeff Thomas wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:For it to be murder would require intent,and that would usually involve a prolonged beating.

Ah i see, very harsh

Said he used to boast that you can kill a man with one punch if done right.