Page 5 of 6
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 09:41
by DavidPayne
Surely he needs to add something back in here...he has to pull out a name for Macklin doesn't he?
Andy Lee, Bronko McKart, Kasim Ouma, Sam Soliman and Campos all have fights scheduled in September.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 09:45
by Adamj1987
DavidPayne wrote:Surely he needs to add something back in here...he has to pull out a name for Macklin doesn't he?
Andy Lee, Bronko McKart, Kasim Ouma, Sam Soliman and Campos all have fights scheduled in September.
please be mckart
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 09:57
by mickey1975
Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:10
by Autobarn
mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:12
by Adamj1987
Autobarn wrote:mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:20
by leforge
mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
Thats what I thought other promotors not happy.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:28
by Counter-puncher
Adamj1987 wrote:Autobarn wrote:mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:29
by Adamj1987
Counter-puncher wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:Autobarn wrote:are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:35
by Counter-puncher
part of me actually wants the whole card to be cancelled now :(
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:41
by Horse
The main event is off and one of the main support fights is off. Can this still be a PPV?
Cleverly vs Murat
Brook vs Jennings
Maccarinelli vs Frenkel
Chisora vs Sexton
DeGale vs Dilks
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:45
by Deno1986
Adamj1987 wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:
he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Is the bill called the 'Famous Five' now?
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:45
by leforge
The card not on the sky schedules?
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:46
by Adamj1987
Deno1986 wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Is the bill called the 'Famous Five' now?
im expecting more to drop out now
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:49
by Autobarn
fantastic four?
heroic trio?
dynamic duo?
remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:50
by Adamj1987
Autobarn wrote:fantastic four?
heroic trio?
dynamic duo?
remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
indeed i was there at that 1 as well maybe im jinxing them
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:00
by mickey1975
At present,im just as interested in this Saturday now.A great double header.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:01
by Deno1986
mickey1975 wrote:At present,im just as interested in this Saturday now.A great double header.
Couldn't agree more.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:06
by Counter-puncher
Autobarn wrote:fantastic four?
heroic trio?
dynamic duo?
remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
fvck off i had tickets to that one too :(
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:51
by paddyavh
Horse wrote:The main event is off and one of the main support fights is off. Can this still be a PPV?
Cleverly vs Murat
Brook vs Jennings
Maccarinelli vs Frenkel
Chisora vs Sexton
DeGale vs Dilks
I persume its got to be as it would have all been budgeted in. I got a £150 ringside ticket, cant be arsed to go now.
Bet FW comes up with a 35+ ex world champion for Macklin.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:52
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
bet brook-jennings is off soon
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 14:07
by bfchunk
REAL_DEAL wrote:If sky also add the Mosley bill (undercard is good) then it will be worth it.
This would seem the best way to rescue this as a PPV now
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 17:27
by leforge
Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 17:39
by Spud
leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Told you smelt a rat!!!

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 17:44
by leforge
Spud wrote:leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Told you smelt a rat!!!

I wonder who macklin will face now? Anymore news from your corner shop?
Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 17:46
by Spud
leforge wrote:Spud wrote:leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Told you smelt a rat!!!

I wonder who macklin will face now? Anymore news from your corner shop?
Nope - but he was right about another pull out !!! - got the name right too - luck I say - I am getting sick of the **** - wont tell me about the December/Jan show - whilst I was there the phone rang - he said to the bloke on the other end of the line "hang on a minute got to tell spud to f*ck off or he will tell boxrec" - so the drums are starting to beat again
I am going to refuse to buy anything again in there - he will wilt as he always does and then I can annoy the f*cking life out of you lot - by stating I know something but cant tell you - someone is bound to bite.
Back to that Magnificent 7 bill - one fight has a decent replacement.