Page 5 of 6
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 11:41
by Finn
tonyevs wrote:kingfinn wrote:
what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career, and suddenly he's not an exciting ko specialist. In his las 4 fights he had what 10 knockdowns? maybe more.

wow
You are easilly pleased.
The Ruiz fight aside from the knockdowns wasn`t overly exciting. Even though Ruiz fought like a novice with his walking in straight lines with low hands
Haye hardly fought like an exciting fighter .. I urge you to re-watch it.
And against Audley.
Audley wasn`t the only gun shy guy in the early rounds. Haye was just as reluctant to let his hands go

It sounds like you're the easily pleased one, at least haye destroys sub par opposition - the klits go 10 rounds with them without putting them on their arses until they're on their last legs.
Lets not start blowing smoke up the klits arses they havent fought and beaten anyone we would consider great. All their opposition bar lewis would be considered sub par and even some of them have beaten wlad.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 11:49
by Finn
stujones wrote:kingfinn wrote:
what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career, and suddenly he's not an exciting ko specialist. In his las 4 fights he had what 10 knockdowns? maybe more.
Valuev was a dull one, Ruiz wasn't exactly Hagler vs Hearns and Harrison and Maccarinelli were both dull untill one punch changed the fight.
Try 5 Knockdowns in his last four fights. 1 vs Harrison, 1 vs Maccarinelli and 3 vs Ruiz.
They werent even his last four fights!

Replace macca with barrett.
And ruiz was down 4 times - twice in the first round.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:06
by tonyevs
kingfinn wrote:tonyevs wrote:Haye was an exciting fighter only in the early part of his career. Certainly not since his move to heavyweight.
I really don't understand how people say he is exciting to watch now. In the Valuev contest he stunk - ran for eleven and a half rounds, landed one big punch ....and somehow got the verdict. I challenge anybody to namel me a worse heavyweight title fight - well maybe his Audley fight wins...
All the critism went to Audley that night .. But he wasn't the only one reluctant to throw punches early on.
I will be cheering on Wlad. He may be robotic, rather boring inside & outside the ropes. But he is a good role model for boxing.
The old timers would respectfully shake hands before a fight. Even the vicious Harry Greb would do so. So why do these pathetic types like Haye feel the need to trash talk and refuse to give opponents respect?
hype ... and at heavyweight - thats all Haye has been.
Wlad v Rahman - challenge complete! . now you name me a worst title fight that doesnt involve a klitschko.
Wlad v Rahman. Certainly no edge of seat affair ... but Wlad was coming forward. And got it over just over halfway.
The problem was more Rahman.
But Haye V Valuev .... Haye was running around the ring apron for 11 and a half rounds. Throwing the occasional single shot.
Nope .. you fail
So to name you a worse heavyweight title fight that doesn`t include a Klitchsko ... Haye V Valuev

Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:17
by stujones
kingfinn wrote:stujones wrote:kingfinn wrote:
what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career, and suddenly he's not an exciting ko specialist. In his las 4 fights he had what 10 knockdowns? maybe more.
Valuev was a dull one, Ruiz wasn't exactly Hagler vs Hearns and Harrison and Maccarinelli were both dull untill one punch changed the fight.
Try 5 Knockdowns in his last four fights. 1 vs Harrison, 1 vs Maccarinelli and 3 vs Ruiz.
They werent even his last four fights!

Replace macca with barrett.
And ruiz was down 4 times - twice in the first round.
Fair point, I stand correct on both.
Although I do maintain that Haye has been in more than one dull one. What about his fights with Abdoul and Johansen at Cruiser - the Abdoul fight especially was a stinker, a real Klitchsko esque performance - didn't know how to find away around a defensively minded fighter.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:19
by stujones
King Geedorah wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:King Geedorah wrote:Ali-Jimmy Young was worse than Valuev-Haye.
I once watched an episode of Eldorado. That was worse too.
Cheap, nasty looking women in Eldorado, that kind of gave it limited appeal.
I recall that Witherspoon-Page was pretty tepid also. Perhaps Valuev-Haye should be dubbed "Worst fight ever if you've only been following the sport since 1997."

maybe add a few years to the date - Akinwande vs Lewis anyone.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:22
by Andypittcov
stujones wrote:King Geedorah wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:
I once watched an episode of Eldorado. That was worse too.
Cheap, nasty looking women in Eldorado, that kind of gave it limited appeal.
I recall that Witherspoon-Page was pretty tepid also. Perhaps Valuev-Haye should be dubbed "Worst fight ever if you've only been following the sport since 1997."

maybe add a few years to the date - Akinwande vs Lewis anyone.
I was just about to add that fight, 1997.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:26
by Ezzard
Page-Tubbs...
Saturday afternoon on ITV... Two fat blokes lying on the ropes... Nowadays it would be made into Channel 4/5 "Fat documentary"
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:30
by stujones
Ezzard wrote:Page-Tubbs...
Saturday afternoon on ITV... Two fat blokes lying on the ropes... Nowadays it would be made into Channel 4/5 "Fat documentary"
It was back in an area in which TV could say what they liked. I remember Dickie Davies, in a subsequent heavyweight title fight (might have been Witherspoon vs Smith) call that fight dull.
One of the most exciting Heavyweights of all time was involved in a stinker that is up there with any listed thus far - Tyson vs Smith.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:32
by Deserter
kingfinn wrote:what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career.
Sorry mate, but that statement's a load of rubbish.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:33
by Andypittcov
stujones wrote:Ezzard wrote:Page-Tubbs...
Saturday afternoon on ITV... Two fat blokes lying on the ropes... Nowadays it would be made into Channel 4/5 "Fat documentary"
It was back in an area in which TV could say what they liked. I remember Dickie Davies, in a subsequent heavyweight title fight (might have been Witherspoon vs Smith) call that fight dull.
One of the most exciting Heavyweights of all time was involved in a stinker that is up there with any listed thus far - Tyson vs Smith.
Tyson-Golota
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:36
by JC
Wlad vs Ibragamov takes some beating.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:38
by stujones
Andypittcov wrote:stujones wrote:Ezzard wrote:Page-Tubbs...
Saturday afternoon on ITV... Two fat blokes lying on the ropes... Nowadays it would be made into Channel 4/5 "Fat documentary"
It was back in an area in which TV could say what they liked. I remember Dickie Davies, in a subsequent heavyweight title fight (might have been Witherspoon vs Smith) call that fight dull.
One of the most exciting Heavyweights of all time was involved in a stinker that is up there with any listed thus far - Tyson vs Smith.
Tyson-Golota
Not a title fight, for the length of time it lasted it was quite good. Golota floored in the first and seemed to be back in it. Looked like he had the beatings of Mike and then quit. A very bizarre fight and ending.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 12:42
by Andypittcov
Oh my mistake thought it was a title fight.
Yeah it was bizarre and extremely deflating.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 13:20
by Finn
tonyevs wrote:kingfinn wrote:tonyevs wrote:Haye was an exciting fighter only in the early part of his career. Certainly not since his move to heavyweight.
I really don't understand how people say he is exciting to watch now. In the Valuev contest he stunk - ran for eleven and a half rounds, landed one big punch ....and somehow got the verdict. I challenge anybody to namel me a worse heavyweight title fight - well maybe his Audley fight wins...
All the critism went to Audley that night .. But he wasn't the only one reluctant to throw punches early on.
I will be cheering on Wlad. He may be robotic, rather boring inside & outside the ropes. But he is a good role model for boxing.
The old timers would respectfully shake hands before a fight. Even the vicious Harry Greb would do so. So why do these pathetic types like Haye feel the need to trash talk and refuse to give opponents respect?
hype ... and at heavyweight - thats all Haye has been.
Wlad v Rahman - challenge complete! . now you name me a worst title fight that doesnt involve a klitschko.
Wlad v Rahman. Certainly no edge of seat affair ... but Wlad was coming forward. And got it over just over halfway.
The problem was more Rahman.
But Haye V Valuev .... Haye was running around the ring apron for 11 and a half rounds. Throwing the occasional single shot.
Nope .. you fail
So to name you a worse heavyweight title fight that doesn`t include a Klitchsko ... Haye V Valuev

No you fail - haye wasnt a world champion and was fighting for a world title against a man 8 stone heavier and the world ranked number 3 who had never been stopped before - that was still a competative fight, punches were thrown, it was boring but not an embarrassment. - wlad was the world number 1 and fighting an old shot has been who didnt even land a punch and still took 7 rounds to stop him on his feet without dropping him once. It was not only extremely boring but showed that the world number 1 couldnt destroy a no longer world class fighter in Rahman even without any return fire. It was a discrace to the sport of boxing.
Lennox lewis had absolutely destroyed a prime Rahman in 4 rounds 7 years earlier.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 13:21
by Finn
Deserter wrote:kingfinn wrote:what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career.
Sorry mate, but that statement's a load of rubbish.
Name the other one?
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 13:35
by gman tilz
come on HAYE!!
I Cant belive how many people would like to see haye get beat.
Hes better to watch and british!!!
Hope he smashes wlad..
The more world titles for the british the better.
Would ever happened to pride..
you wouldnt hear a german or ukrainian say they want haye to smash wlad, but here it seems a bit different..
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 17:08
by Deserter
kingfinn wrote:Deserter wrote:kingfinn wrote:what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career.
Sorry mate, but that statement's a load of rubbish.
Name the other one?
If you'd read the thread properly you'd see I already had, but for your benefit I'll do it again - Ismail Abdoul. Up there with Robin Reid versus Sugarboy Malinga for the worst title fight I've ever had to watch.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 17:29
by Finn
Deserter wrote:kingfinn wrote:Deserter wrote:
Sorry mate, but that statement's a load of rubbish.
Name the other one?
If you'd read the thread properly you'd see I already had, but for your benefit I'll do it again - Ismail Abdoul. Up there with Robin Reid versus Sugarboy Malinga for the worst title fight I've ever had to watch.
The abdoul fight wasnt even that bad. I think you just picked the only fight other than the valuev one which haye didnt beat his opponent half to death in, thats including the thompson fight. In the hope that no one else watched it and would take your word for it.
But since there were boo's we can now say wow haye has had two boring fights out of the 26 showcases he's put on. And it was an EBU title fight not a world title fight.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 18:47
by crusader
I have not been entertained by the HW iteration of Haye. Bonin and Harrison were completely overmatched and both went down without putting up a fight; Ruiz tried but he was never competitive, and there was few if any good two way exchanges; and I don't need to explain why Vauev-Haye sucked. Haye is simply a different fighter at the new weight.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 12 May 2011, 21:00
by gobbles
kingfinn wrote:Deserter wrote:kingfinn wrote:
Name the other one?
If you'd read the thread properly you'd see I already had, but for your benefit I'll do it again - Ismail Abdoul. Up there with Robin Reid versus Sugarboy Malinga for the worst title fight I've ever had to watch.
The abdoul fight wasnt even that bad. I think you just picked the only fight other than the valuev one which haye didnt beat his opponent half to death in, thats including the thompson fight. In the hope that no one else watched it and would take your word for it.
But since there were boo's we can now say wow haye has had two boring fights out of the 26 showcases he's put on. And it was an EBU title fight not a world title fight.
You obviously didn't see the Abdoul fight. So boring people walked out in droves. It was purely an exercise in trying to prove Haye could go 12 rounds.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 13 May 2011, 02:11
by Deserter
kingfinn wrote:The abdoul fight wasnt even that bad. I think you just picked the only fight other than the valuev one which haye didnt beat his opponent half to death in, thats including the thompson fight. In the hope that no one else watched it and would take your word for it.
But since there were boo's we can now say wow haye has had two boring fights out of the 26 showcases he's put on. And it was an EBU title fight not a world title fight.
If your other statement was rubbish, this one is utterly idiotic. The abdoul fight was an utter disgrace and your statement proves you can't have watched it. What added insult to injury was the post-fight interview where Haye and Booth basically said they just wanted to see if Haye could do the 12 rounds so focused on that - he barely threw anything other than a jab for the entire fight and treated it like a slow-paced sparring session, which was hugely insulting to paying fans who'd come to see action. As I've said, it's definitely up there with the Malinga-Reid fight as the worst fight I've ever seen, so back in your box son.
And to give my statement some much-needed context, just a cursory search on here of my posts relating to Haye will prove to you that I've actually been a fan to date and have sung his praises on numerous occasions, so don't imply that I'm a 'hater' just because I'm not some dreamy-eyed fan-boy who isn't prepared to acknowledge Haye's failings as well as the strengths.
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 13 May 2011, 02:11
by Deserter
gobbles wrote:kingfinn wrote:Deserter wrote:
If you'd read the thread properly you'd see I already had, but for your benefit I'll do it again - Ismail Abdoul. Up there with Robin Reid versus Sugarboy Malinga for the worst title fight I've ever had to watch.
The abdoul fight wasnt even that bad. I think you just picked the only fight other than the valuev one which haye didnt beat his opponent half to death in, thats including the thompson fight. In the hope that no one else watched it and would take your word for it.
But since there were boo's we can now say wow haye has had two boring fights out of the 26 showcases he's put on. And it was an EBU title fight not a world title fight.
You obviously didn't see the Abdoul fight. So boring people walked out in droves. It was purely an exercise in trying to prove Haye could go 12 rounds.
Exactly!
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 13 May 2011, 04:13
by freddydoesdallas
Haye was on 5live this morning talking about the fight. He was very complimentary about Wlad, talked about how excited he was about the fight and what it would mean to him when he wins. He was also directly asked about his retirement and said there is a strong possibility that he won't retire in October
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 13 May 2011, 07:11
by Captain Hook
tonyevs wrote:doctorboxing wrote:tonyevs wrote:[
re-read his post. And see if you see the glaring mistake ... pm me, and I tell you if you don`t know either
Ok, yes I forgot about Tua's KO of Ruiz in 1996, sorry for not checking boxrec records before I post, but everything else in the post stands, including the Ruiz observation.
To say Haye is just hype is crazy, regardless of how you feel about the man himself.
If you needed to check boxrec records 1st ... then I rest my case

I missed that fact too, and no, I wouldn't have needed Boxrec to verify it.
The point is, you don't like Haye and want Wlad to win. I want the opposite.
But to say Haye v Valuev is one of the worst heavyweight title fights is a bit rich when you consider the C and D-rate heavies the K bros have carried over the last decade.
It may have been pretty dull, but it had intrigue and was tense because of the size difference. It was David v Goliath.
When was the last time one of the Klits was in an intriguing bout? VK v Lewis?
Re: Are any Brits supporting Wlad?
Posted: 13 May 2011, 07:13
by Captain Hook
kingfinn wrote:tonyevs wrote:kingfinn wrote:
what a load of rubbish, haye's had one boring fight in his whole career, and suddenly he's not an exciting ko specialist. In his las 4 fights he had what 10 knockdowns? maybe more.

wow
You are easilly pleased.
The Ruiz fight aside from the knockdowns wasn`t overly exciting. Even though Ruiz fought like a novice with his walking in straight lines with low hands
Haye hardly fought like an exciting fighter .. I urge you to re-watch it.
And against Audley.
Audley wasn`t the only gun shy guy in the early rounds. Haye was just as reluctant to let his hands go

It sounds like you're the easily pleased one, at least haye destroys sub par opposition - the klits go 10 rounds with them without putting them on their arses until they're on their last legs.
Lets not start blowing smoke up the klits arses they havent fought and beaten anyone we would consider great. All their opposition bar lewis would be considered sub par and even some of them have beaten wlad.
Well said....