This is why some people don't like you.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ummm, I singled out the WBC belt because that's the one that Trevor Berbick had. A different example could have been a different belt. Perhaps it is too complicated for you.
;;-)
This is why some people don't like you.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ummm, I singled out the WBC belt because that's the one that Trevor Berbick had. A different example could have been a different belt. Perhaps it is too complicated for you.
Someone that takes issue with my superior intellect has to deal with their insecurities on their own. I'm not a therapist and have no desire to be one. But that doesn't mean you should be so stubborn as not to learn some basic stuff. It will aid you in future endeavors.Crease wrote:This is why some people don't like you.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ummm, I singled out the WBC belt because that's the one that Trevor Berbick had. A different example could have been a different belt. Perhaps it is too complicated for you.
;;-)
The WBC response made it all worthwhile. I laughed for a few minutes when I read that. Thanks Crease!Goodnight, Irene wrote:Saad, its like you took a bullet for me in this thread. Im touched![]()
Unfortunately, it has been in vain trying to explain the situation to Crease.
flatnoseflynn wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:Thanks for letting us know you started following the sport yesterday. We'll let you get a year or two under your belt before we continue.flatnoseflynn wrote: WBA is a recognised championship so Valuev was a champion. Sorry FACT![]()
Keyboard Warrior
15000 post? mate you must have a sad lifeand before you get the grammer comments out tell somebody who cares
tyson is the youngest he beat berbick at 20 years, 4 months and 22 days old patterson was 21 years and 10 monthsGoodnight, Irene wrote:This record is a myth.Livingstone Cole wrote:Tyson HW champ at 21. I can't see that happening.
What about that Welsh fella? The one that started fighting when he was 10 or something. That one should stay where it is too.
The youngest champ ever is Patterson, aged 20.
It will be a long time before Hopkins' new record as oldest linear champion in history is broken. Hell, I'm surprised Foreman's holding of the record didn't last longer (1994-2011). Foreman still holds the record for being oldest man to hold the linear championship, though (48, 1997), & that may stay forever. I doubt Hopkins will be Light-Heavy champ three years from now.
You're on your own, I did all I could.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Its a dumbass marathon
And this insult coming from the one who stated that Floyd was 20 when he won his title.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Its a dumbass marathon
The second two aren't really records.IRLangmaid25 wrote:Henry Cooper winning 3 Lonsdale Belts outright.
Edwin Valero's 27 consecutive knockouts.
Henry Armstrong fighting 30 times in a year.
Greb went 45-0 in a year. Hank is up there for title defenses in a year.J-C wrote:The second two aren't really records.IRLangmaid25 wrote:Henry Cooper winning 3 Lonsdale Belts outright.
Edwin Valero's 27 consecutive knockouts.
Henry Armstrong fighting 30 times in a year.
Lamar Clark had 44 consecutive knockouts and several fighters had a streak of more than 27.
Several fighters (including Len Wickwar and Ted Kid Lewis) fought over 30 times in a year.
Goodnight, Irene wrote:This record is a myth.Livingstone Cole wrote:Tyson HW champ at 21. I can't see that happening.
What about that Welsh fella? The one that started fighting when he was 10 or something. That one should stay where it is too.
The youngest champ ever is Patterson, aged 20.
It will be a long time before Hopkins' new record as oldest linear champion in history is broken. Hell, I'm surprised Foreman's holding of the record didn't last longer (1994-2011). Foreman still holds the record for being oldest man to hold the linear championship, though (48, 1997), & that may stay forever. I doubt Hopkins will be Light-Heavy champ three years from now.
He was also ranked in the world's top 10 by The Ring magazine aged just 16, which I imagine is a record.Livingstone Cole wrote:I think, if I'm remembering this correctly, his grandson posts or has posted here.flatnoseflynn wrote:JDC wrote: Whos that?
Nipper Pat Daly, real name Patrick Clifford Daley (17 February 1913 – 25 September 1988)
I think this could be beat if the boxers was world-class and stayed on the domestic scene long enough.IRLangmaid25 wrote:Henry Cooper winning 3 Lonsdale Belts outright.
BBBoC changed the rules, making it impossible. Same with winning titles at different weights.Crease wrote:I think this could be beat if the boxers was world-class and stayed on the domestic scene long enough.IRLangmaid25 wrote:Henry Cooper winning 3 Lonsdale Belts outright.
It's not impossible. They changed the rule so that a British Champion must defend the title three times before he can keep the belt. (It used to be two defences).orbtastic wrote:BBBoC changed the rules, making it impossible. Same with winning titles at different weights.
I think, although I'd have to check, that several boxers have met the old criteria for winning 3 belts outright.
Saddlers style always reminds me of Michael Spinks.jaclem2 wrote:feather weight ..sandy saddler......total bouts 162....kayos 103......retired with title because of eye injuries suffered in a car crash...
No, they changed the rule, in about 1987 I think. You cannot win more than one Lonsdale belt in the same division.Crease wrote:It's not impossible. They changed the rule so that a British Champion must defend the title three times before he can keep the belt. (It used to be two defences).orbtastic wrote:BBBoC changed the rules, making it impossible. Same with winning titles at different weights.
I think, although I'd have to check, that several boxers have met the old criteria for winning 3 belts outright.
I a fighter wins the Lonsdale belt and defends it three times he gets to keep that belt.
And he could just do the same pattern three times over.
Equals he owns three Lonsdale belts.
Ah, sh1t... I didn't know that.orbtastic wrote:No, they changed the rule, in about 1987 I think. You cannot win more than one Lonsdale belt in the same division.
Costs 'em money. The belts now are 9ct gold whereas before they were 22ct and solid. To win 3 now would be an incredible feat. You'd need 4 W notches at 3 different weights (!) That's 12 wins over BBBoC sanctioned fighters.Crease wrote:Ah, sh1t... I didn't know that.orbtastic wrote:No, they changed the rule, in about 1987 I think. You cannot win more than one Lonsdale belt in the same division.
No I disagree, mate. I think it could be done... But ti would need to be fasttracked, obviously.orbtastic wrote:I think that Rhodes' record of Lonsdale outright in 91 (without checking?) days would also be impossible now you need 4 notches.