BoxRec

Three minutes after the verdict live on allegedly Lillis and I went for it. There was not a splinter anywhere near our fat arses! We are not the other mob, the bottle job gang!

Adios and thanks.

Buncey wrote:Three minutes after the verdict live on Allegedly channel Lillis and I went for it. There was not a splinter anywhere near our fat arses! We are not the other mob, the bottle job gang!

Adios and thanks.

You are right. You and Steve called it rightly. BTW, even though sometimes you do my tree in, I love you, man.

Wanna go out for a drink sometime?

;;-)

Buncey wrote:Three minutes after the verdict live on Allegedly channel Lillis and I went for it. There was not a splinter anywhere near our fat arses! We are not the other mob, the bottle job gang!

Adios and thanks.

Hold my hands up and apologise, I was wrong to fire off at you and the program you do.

I scored the fight a draw. Norton did next to NOTHING throughout, he shaded some of the early rounds then did barely landed a blow after round 6. Williams was terrible in the first half but did marginally pick things up after halfway and outlanded Norton (this wasn't difficult). If anyone could tell me which round Norton deserved to win in the second half, apart from the 11th, I'd love to know.

There's no conspiracy theory against Norton. His work was ineffective, he pawed with his shots and was extremely negative. It's not as if Norton hasn't had the rub of the green in the past, twice getting the nod over David Dolan in close fights. Finally, the cruiserweight division can move on.

Ben Carey wrote:I scored the fight a draw. Norton did next to NOTHING throughout, he shaded some of the early rounds then did barely landed a blow after round 6. Williams was terrible in the first half but did marginally pick things up after halfway and outlanded Norton (this wasn't difficult). If anyone could tell me which round Norton deserved to win in the second half, apart from the 11th, I'd love to know.

There's no conspiracy theory against Norton. His work was ineffective, he pawed with his shots and was extremely negative. It's not as if Norton hasn't had the rub of the green in the past, twice getting the nod over David Dolan in close fights. Finally, the cruiserweight division can move on.

I feel Norton definately won the first fight with Dolan, and lost the second.

I did feel Norton was a winner on Friday, pretty clear. However, I would have liked to have seen the ref being stronger on his "kidology". It seemed to be a case of can't punch, won't punch.

There will be a huge queue for Williams thats for sure.

Baboon wrote:Right, sod it. Norton may be a dull fighter but in a trade off Williams gave THE most boring interview on the Bunce hour....so to save listening to him again after the fight.....c'mon Rob

Late shout, but f*ck me is this correct. It was withhold-his-purse dull

Buncey wrote:Why would I gloss over it? Did I gloss over it after the fight? I've never glossed over it - from being banned by the ABA in the late 80s to being banned by Duff ... 'gloss' over it. That's an insult, now I'm not happy.

Adios.

Yeah, fair play to Mr Bunce, he was clear how bad a decision he thought it was after the fight.

There was no "glossing over".

Was/Is either fighter signed with the promoter(s)?

One for Buncey - does it seem odd having to talk back to Keys when he seemingly knows nothing about boxing? I know he need to break back into telly after the Sky Sports thing but really, Keys?

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Was/Is either fighter signed with the promoter(s)?

least we know we can expect similar scorn if there is ever any dodgy decisions on a fwp or qb card

Also when you say the others Steve, are you referring to sky because I'm pretty sure about the same time they started asking questions fwp started thinking of channel changing. I look forward to you tearing one of his fighters a new one in similar form to Saturday ..... I'll believe it when I see it though.