Re: Adrien Broner : The next big thing in boxing ??
Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 16:23
x2Horse wrote:He isn't the next big thing. He isn't anything special.
x2Horse wrote:He isn't the next big thing. He isn't anything special.
Burns should have got his hands on him while he had the chance.billy nelson wrote:x2Horse wrote:He isn't the next big thing. He isn't anything special.
Broner would never come over to the UK to fight Brook unless seriously big money was offered.300 wrote:Broner is stuvk between a rock and a hard place.
147.
Mayweather ( won't fight him, Broner would lose anyway).
Pac. Still dangerous.
Bradley. Tough and very strong
Brook. Big and dangerous. ( Matchroom should make an offer to get that fight here!)
Alexander. Friend.
Maidana. Power
JMM Still a very good fighter.
140
Mathysse.. Power!
Garcia. Power ( Friend?)
Judah. Power/speed but erratic.
Khan - still very relevant.
Rios. Pressure/tough.
He won't have his size advantage of 150lbs on the night as he did vs Lightweights.
Could Ricky have jumped up to welter and beaten Paulie ?billy nelson wrote:x2Horse wrote:He isn't the next big thing. He isn't anything special.
Jones pulled out of the Purdy bout late on and Lee boxed another man. The Purdy v Jones bout would have been a very good bout. If the Brook v Jones rematch goes ahead it should be very good; Jones is a tough cookie. The point about levels is valid; Alexander played with Purdy and looked very good; Brook would have his hands full with Devon all right.hurlock wrote:Who is kell brook outside the uk?? Honestly.
I like brook but the only person he has beat remotely known was Carson jones & he struggled & faded against a club fighter. Did purdy beat jones aswell???
& we saw the levels v Alexander against purdy & I don't think brook brushes off this type of opposition.