BoxRec

chucktaylor wrote:The announcer sort of fvcked up there

He's been fvcking up all night.

palooka wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:Sensible scoring there. Shame there had to be a loser, but I had Crolla nicking it.

X2; Rees didn't look near his best and Crolla was very well prepared and drilled; lightweight is a very tough division in the UK.

Put him in with Mitchell and the winner gets Burns.

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns; Ricky is on a different level.

at least he wasn't out of his depth vs rees, which the bulk of british scene posters decided.

crolla must be doing something right.

so what about burns, who won't be interested anyway.

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns.

Well they're talking about them fighting. Thats my point.

How did you score that LC?

columbo wrote:

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns.

Well they're talking about them fighting. Thats my point.

They talk and we talk but we know what we're talking about

columbo wrote:

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns.

Well they're talking about them fighting. Thats my point.

They talk and we talk but we know what we're talking about [/quote]

It's a complete mismatch if it gets made. That's all im saying.

Been promised a world title fight in november for Crolla.... so Burns has to fight a 2 world title fights within 2 months.

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns; Ricky is on a different level.

I would fancy Denis Shafikov to give burns a real go.

I agree with you, Burns is on a different level altogether.

So instead of a unification fight for Burns we see a mismatch... great.

115-114 Gavin Rees,close cracking fight

rio wrote:

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns; Ricky is on a different level.

I would fancy Denis Shafikov to give burns a real go.

Sorry rio; my post above was to columbo; I'm an armchair/weekend fan and I've not seen Dennis box :(

rio wrote:

palooka wrote:

columbo wrote:Crolla is a nice guy and a good fighter but he's domestic level and he hasnt got a hope in hell against Burns.

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns; Ricky is on a different level.

I would fancy Denis Shafikov to give burns a real go.

Sorry rio; my post above was to columbo; I'm an armchair/weekend fan and I've not seen Dennis box :([/quote]

He's an unbeaten russian prospect

columbo wrote:So instead of a unification fight for Burns we see a mismatch... great.

Can't you just enjoy what's been a good nights boxing?

You're such a whiny bastard.

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:So instead of a unification fight for Burns we see a mismatch... great.

Can't you just enjoy what's been a good nights boxing?

You're such a whiny bastard.

Cant you ever stop defending Hearn?

So what? No other lightweight in Britain or Europe has a hope v Burns; Ricky is on a different level.[/quote]


I would fancy Denis Shafikov to give burns a real go.[/quote]

Sorry rio; my post above was to columbo; I'm an armchair/weekend fan and I've not seen Dennis box :([/quote]

He's an unbeaten russian prospect [/quote]

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Hes certainly a more worthy opponent than crolla. However he would be one of those high risk low reward fights.

columbo wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:So instead of a unification fight for Burns we see a mismatch... great.

Can't you just enjoy what's been a good nights boxing?

You're such a whiny bastard.

Cant you ever stop defending Hearn?

fornicating hopeless.

So I'm wrong then, it wasn't a good show? Tell you what, forget the good points, lets jump straight into negatives. Why not.

I don't want Burns to fight Crolla, but then again the fight hasn't been made.

columbo wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:So instead of a unification fight for Burns we see a mismatch... great.

Can't you just enjoy what's been a good nights boxing?

You're such a whiny bastard.

Cant you ever stop defending Hearn?

effing hopeless.

So I'm wrong then, it wasn't a good show? Tell you what, forget the good points, lets just straight into negatives. Why not.[/quote]

Yeah it was a decent show but that doesnt warrant a Burns vs Crolla matchup ..... Ps love how you get personal. Classy

columbo wrote:
Yeah it was a decent show but that doesnt warrant a Burns vs Crolla matchup ..... Ps love how you get personal. Classy

Its not even been made, so why bother moaning. You skim over every good point to push your negative agenda. Look over the forums tonight, your posts are on the whole entirely negative. No need for it is there?

And sorry about calling you a whiny bastard, i didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:
Yeah it was a decent show but that doesnt warrant a Burns vs Crolla matchup ..... Ps love how you get personal. Classy

Its not even been made, so why bother moaning. You skim over every good point to push your negative agenda. Look over the forums tonight, your posts are on the whole entirely negative. No need for it is there?

And sorry about calling you a whiny bastard, i didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

It's not been made but from what was said in the post fight interview there's a strong chance of it happening. You say my negative agenda but I criticise things I feel are deserving of criticism. Go and look at the Frankie Gavin thread. I had nothing but praise for him or go and look about me talking about the Smith vs Dodson fight. I said nothing negative. You criticise me for having digs at Hearn but you do the complete opposite. He can do no wrong in your eyes.

Rees v Crolla was a close fight, I thought Rees might have edged it.
On the undercard that Scott Quigg looks handy.

Ochieng looks a good talent.

columbo wrote: It's not been made but from what was said in the post fight interview there's a strong chance of it happening. You say my negative agenda but I criticise things I feel are deserving of criticism. Go and look at the Frankie Gavin thread. I had nothing but praise for him or go and look about me talking about the Smith vs Dodson fight. I said nothing negative. You criticise me for having digs at Hearn but you do the complete opposite. He can do no wrong in your eyes.

You do nothing but dig pal. I can't stand FW, but I always make sure I praise him when he does something good for boxing. Like the thread I started the other day. And I definitely wouldn't manufacture negative threads about them, unlike you on Matchroom.

And Hearn can do wrong, I don't think Burns has any business fighting Crolla. I personally don't think it'll be made, I don't think Eddie expected Rees to lose.

You don't like Eddie, we get it. But it affects your credibility when you don't give credit for the positives. Its all one way traffic from you.