Page 5 of 6
Posted: 26 Jan 2007, 17:22
by The Hawk
Apart from this time he's won the IBF 140 title twice, the WBA 140 title and the WBA 147 and is lined up to fight Jose Luis Castillo making this 3 fights in a row in America
It's not all bad eh!

Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 06:46
by KO Artist
MightyWarrior wrote:I thought the big announcement

was scheduled for yesterday?
My local mini cab firm got a call last week, asking if any drivers could boil down to 140 in the next month or so - coincidence?
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 07:13
by Autobarn
KO Artist wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:I thought the big announcement

was scheduled for yesterday?
My local mini cab firm got a call last week, asking if any drivers could boil down to 140 in the next month or so - coincidence?
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Floyd's not as great as ppl like to think up in the 140 and 147 pound classes and he looks ever more gunshy. No one's said Hatton was ducking Mayweather. You can bet Mayweather would've ducked his NATURAL challengers Cotto and Margarito had the DLH fight had not been made.
Floyd's superfight is a load of old bollocks anyway. His 'universally recognized' win over Baldomir was no different than beating Maussa or Urango and Oscar is hardly the stuff of legend. Golden Boy picked all his big name foes after they'd looked bad and has seldom been dominant. Tszyu was a lethal fighter even in his mid 30s.
Cotto would beat Hatton. No way at 140 but almost certainly at 147.
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 10:39
by Razor
Bash Ricky thread, we've heard it all before you american bastards

Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 11:24
by MightyWarrior
KO Artist wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:I thought the big announcement

was scheduled for yesterday?
My local mini cab firm got a call last week, asking if any drivers could boil down to 140 in the next month or so - coincidence?
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Yes seems that way doesn't it. But Witter does make it easy for him to avoid the fight, with some recently dull performances.
Hennessey should put Witter in with an agressive pressure fighter, with a less than graninte chin. Junior needs a good KO.
Warren tends to get credit for looking after Ricky's career, but it does look like Hatton wasted his best years on forgetable WBU "defences" instead of mixing it with the likes of Harris & Cotto - they even turned down an old Sharmba Mitchell.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:06
by Max Molyneux
Cotto's too dead at 10stone Search.
Even at Welter though Is Cotto experienced enough?
As for Harris didn't he turn down the Hatton fight?
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:23
by states
Max Molyneux wrote:Cotto's too dead at 10stone Search.
Even at Welter though Is Cotto experienced enough?
As for Harris didn't he turn down the Hatton fight?
Not sure that Cotto's experience comes into it at 147. His strength and power sure as hell does though. I think Cotto beats up Ricky at welterweight, and I'm a big fan of Hatton.
Yes, Harris did turn down a fight with Hatton. allegedly offered Harris 750 grand to come to the M.E.N., prior to the Tszyu fight, and Harris turned it down when he found out that Ricky, as the challenger, would be earning more. There were numerous promotional issues for Harris as well at the time, he claimed that he'd be taking home next to fornicate all of that money. He did offer to let it go to purse bids. Sports Network/Hatton declined. The upshot of that was Harris went to Germany to fight Urkal again for considerably less, and Hatton ended up fighting Tszyu (eventually)
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:34
by Andy Mac
search wrote:viciousmaussa wrote:KO Artist wrote:
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Floyd's not as great as ppl like to think up in the 140 and 147 pound classes and he looks ever more gunshy. No one's said Hatton was ducking Mayweather. You can bet Mayweather would've ducked his NATURAL challengers Cotto and Margarito had the DLH fight had not been made.
Floyd's superfight is a load of old bollocks anyway. His 'universally recognized' win over Baldomir was no different than beating Maussa or Urango and Oscar is hardly the stuff of legend. Golden Boy picked all his big name foes after they'd looked bad and has seldom been dominant. Tszyu was a lethal fighter even in his mid 30s.
Cotto would beat Hatton. No way at 140 but almost certainly at 147.
Baldomir would beat Hatton IMO.
Cotto would take him at 140 or 147... body shots.
DE LA HOYA ("not the stuff of legends") would completely obliterate HATTON.
Didn't Floyd already deal with HAttons next "superfight" - castillo, when castillo was a better fighter?
No, Mayflower took care of JLC when he had just had 3 fights at Welter, then had another 4 straight after at similar weights after Mayflower.
Baldomir is a joke that asked for more to fight Hatton than Collazo, Lazcano, or any of the other fighters HBO approved for Hattons first fight for them.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:46
by Blue
states wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Cotto's too dead at 10stone Search.
Even at Welter though Is Cotto experienced enough?
As for Harris didn't he turn down the Hatton fight?
Not sure that Cotto's experience comes into it at 147. His strength and power sure as hell does though. I think Cotto beats up Ricky at welterweight, and I'm a big fan of Hatton.
Yes, Harris did turn down a fight with Hatton. allegedly allegedly offered Harris 750 grand to come to the M.E.N., prior to the Tszyu fight, and Harris turned it down when he found out that Ricky, as the challenger, would be earning more. There were numerous promotional issues for Harris as well at the time, he claimed that he'd be taking home next to eff all of that money.
He did offer to let it go to purse bids. Sports Network/Hatton declined. The upshot of that was Harris went to Germany to fight Urkal again for considerably less, and Hatton ended up fighting Tszyu (eventually)
Open your eyes man.
Go back and re-read your paragraph again states, it is very clear that
Warren turned down the purse bid, therefore the fight.
Why should the champion be forced to fight for less than the challenger?
When you can see thru the manipulation;
Hatton-turned- down-the-fight!
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 21:12
by states
Harris asked for 750 grand. Warren said 'OK'. Harris then realised that Hatton would be making more. So he turned down the fight.
I don't deny that Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids. But Harris turned down the fight first. He had his reasons, but let's not rewrite history.
Hatton was going to be making more than the 'champion' (Harris was only WBA champion because of the WBA's amazing 'super champion' rules) because he was the draw, and he brought the money. Is that fair? Maybe not, and maybe Harris was within his rights to pull out. But the fact is he asked for a certain amount, he was offered it, and then he said no.
Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 07:31
by The Hawk
Had Hatton fought Harris, he would not have the same acclaim today that fighting and beating Tszyu earned him.
I'm glad the Tszyu fight came instead of Harris, from what I remember Harris done some real messing around over the money side of it and the Tszyu Hatton fight was one of the biggest boxing events in the UK.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 07:52
by Autobarn
search wrote:viciousmaussa wrote:KO Artist wrote:
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Floyd's not as great as ppl like to think up in the 140 and 147 pound classes and he looks ever more gunshy. No one's said Hatton was ducking Mayweather. You can bet Mayweather would've ducked his NATURAL challengers Cotto and Margarito had the DLH fight had not been made.
Floyd's superfight is a load of old bollocks anyway. His 'universally recognized' win over Baldomir was no different than beating Maussa or Urango and Oscar is hardly the stuff of legend. Golden Boy picked all his big name foes after they'd looked bad and has seldom been dominant. Tszyu was a lethal fighter even in his mid 30s.
Cotto would beat Hatton. No way at 140 but almost certainly at 147.
Baldomir would beat Hatton IMO.
Cotto would take him at 140 or 147... body shots.
DE LA HOYA ("not the stuff of legends") would completely obliterate HATTON.
Didn't Floyd already deal with HAttons next "superfight" - castillo, when castillo was a better fighter?
well, most world class 154-pounders would obliterate Hatton. 140-pound Oscar is nothing to get scared about - what did he do beside beat a shot Chavez twice at 140? Miguel Angel Gonzalez on points, a guy who was DECIMATED by Tszyu? Wow, that form suggests he is a 'level above', doesn't it?
Castillo is marketable now, because of the 1st Corrales fight, and we are told he will be better for being at 140. You may want to raise the Ngoudjo fight, but Castillo has looked like that in non title fights before his best showings.
Floyd has 1 lucky win over Castillo, and one more convinving win. But he fought shit scared in both fights. Shit scared and dull as fvck - Castillo was Floyd's best opponent and he never fought anyone close to JLC's quality since.
Cotto at 140, methinks not.
Baldomir? You really are an idiot.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 07:55
by Autobarn
Blue wrote:states wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Cotto's too dead at 10stone Search.
Even at Welter though Is Cotto experienced enough?
As for Harris didn't he turn down the Hatton fight?
Not sure that Cotto's experience comes into it at 147. His strength and power sure as hell does though. I think Cotto beats up Ricky at welterweight, and I'm a big fan of Hatton.
Yes, Harris did turn down a fight with Hatton. allegedly allegedly allegedly offered Harris 750 grand to come to the M.E.N., prior to the Tszyu fight, and Harris turned it down when he found out that Ricky, as the challenger, would be earning more. There were numerous promotional issues for Harris as well at the time, he claimed that he'd be taking home next to eff all of that money.
He did offer to let it go to purse bids. Sports Network/Hatton declined. The upshot of that was Harris went to Germany to fight Urkal again for considerably less, and Hatton ended up fighting Tszyu (eventually)
Open your eyes man.
Go back and re-read your paragraph again states, it is very clear that
Warren turned down the purse bid, therefore the fight.
Why should the champion be forced to fight for less than the challenger?
When you can see thru the manipulation;
Hatton-turned- down-the-fight!
Here is what happened with Hatton-Harris. Harris wouldn't take the title to Manchester for WAY MORE MONEY. Hatton told me no way was he going to fight in Detroit for WAY LESS. Harris has abominable business sense, Hatton at the time was a calculated risk taker.
Anyway, it worked out better, because he got Tszyu.
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 04:46
by Blue
states wrote:Harris asked for 750 grand. Warren said 'OK'. Harris then realised that Hatton would be making more. So he turned down the fight.
I don't deny that Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids. But Harris turned down the fight first. He had his reasons, but let's not rewrite history.
Hatton was going to be making more than the 'champion' (Harris was only WBA champion because of the WBA's amazing 'super champion' rules) because he was the draw, and he brought the money. Is that fair? Maybe not, and maybe Harris was within his rights to pull out. But the fact is he asked for a certain amount, he was offered it, and then he said no.
Harris turned down Warren’s offer but did not turn down the fight.
You said it yourself, “Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids.”
The champion was willing to fight the challenger in his home turf,
but he wanted to be paid an equitable sum to do so.
The purse bid is there to protect the champion from unreasonable
demands of a challenger.
Those rules were there when the Hatton camp bought their mandatory position.
It is you and the Hatton publicist that are trying to rewrite history.
But it is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 06:21
by Roars Like Me
Andy Mac wrote:search wrote:viciousmaussa wrote:Floyd's not as great as ppl like to think up in the 140 and 147 pound classes and he looks ever more gunshy. No one's said Hatton was ducking Mayweather. You can bet Mayweather would've ducked his NATURAL challengers Cotto and Margarito had the DLH fight had not been made.
Floyd's superfight is a load of old bollocks anyway. His 'universally recognized' win over Baldomir was no different than beating Maussa or Urango and Oscar is hardly the stuff of legend. Golden Boy picked all his big name foes after they'd looked bad and has seldom been dominant. Tszyu was a lethal fighter even in his mid 30s.
Cotto would beat Hatton. No way at 140 but almost certainly at 147.
Baldomir would beat Hatton IMO.
Cotto would take him at 140 or 147... body shots.
DE LA HOYA ("not the stuff of legends") would completely obliterate HATTON.
Didn't Floyd already deal with HAttons next "superfight" - castillo, when castillo was a better fighter?
No, Mayflower took care of JLC when he had just had 3 fights at Welter, then had another 4 straight after at similar weights after Mayflower.
Baldomir is a joke that asked for more to fight Hatton than Collazo, Lazcano, or any of the other fighters HBO approved for Hattons first fight for them.
Am i reading you Maywaether quote wrongly here?
PBF beat Castlillo via the judges rather than in the ring in most people's eyes. This was Floys's first fight at Light weight and Castliio's 5th, Not Welter etc?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 06:55
by Autobarn
Blue wrote:states wrote:Harris asked for 750 grand. Warren said 'OK'. Harris then realised that Hatton would be making more. So he turned down the fight.
I don't deny that Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids. But Harris turned down the fight first. He had his reasons, but let's not rewrite history.
Hatton was going to be making more than the 'champion' (Harris was only WBA champion because of the WBA's amazing 'super champion' rules) because he was the draw, and he brought the money. Is that fair? Maybe not, and maybe Harris was within his rights to pull out. But the fact is he asked for a certain amount, he was offered it, and then he said no.
Harris turned down Warren’s offer but did not turn down the fight.
You said it yourself, “Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids.”
The champion was willing to fight the challenger in his home turf,
but he wanted to be paid an equitable sum to do so.
The purse bid is there to protect the champion from unreasonable
demands of a challenger.
Those rules were there when the Hatton camp bought their mandatory position.
It is you and the Hatton publicist that are trying to rewrite history.
But it is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Harris threw away a big payday, opted for an Urkal rematch, and got himself KO'd by Maussa. Either way, Hatton got that fool's title in the end. Harris' image as the next Mike McCallum took a serious hit and if he gets by Lazcano, he'll be over here for small money against nightmare sylist Witter. Harris stands to look like hell AND not earn much.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 08:21
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Roars Like Me wrote:Andy Mac wrote:search wrote:
Baldomir would beat Hatton IMO.
Cotto would take him at 140 or 147... body shots.
DE LA HOYA ("not the stuff of legends") would completely obliterate HATTON.
Didn't Floyd already deal with HAttons next "superfight" - castillo, when castillo was a better fighter?
No, Mayflower took care of JLC when he had just had 3 fights at Welter, then had another 4 straight after at similar weights after Mayflower.
Baldomir is a joke that asked for more to fight Hatton than Collazo, Lazcano, or any of the other fighters HBO approved for Hattons first fight for them.
Am i reading you Maywaether quote wrongly here?
PBF beat Castlillo via the judges rather than in the ring in most people's eyes. This was Floys's first fight at Light weight and Castliio's 5th, Not Welter etc?
Wasnt it his second at lightweight after Augustus
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 09:12
by Roars Like Me
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Roars Like Me wrote:Andy Mac wrote:
No, Mayflower took care of JLC when he had just had 3 fights at Welter, then had another 4 straight after at similar weights after Mayflower.
Baldomir is a joke that asked for more to fight Hatton than Collazo, Lazcano, or any of the other fighters HBO approved for Hattons first fight for them.
Am i reading you Maywaether quote wrongly here?
PBF beat Castlillo via the judges rather than in the ring in most people's eyes. This was Floys's first fight at Light weight and Castliio's 5th, Not Welter etc?
Wasnt it his second at lightweight after Augustus
After Augustus he fought Corrales, Hernandes,Chavez respectively at SF and then his first fight was against Castillo at LW..
So 'No' in short!
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 09:49
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Roars Like Me wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Wasnt it his second at lightweight after Augustus
After Augustus he fought Corrales, Hernandes,Chavez respectively at SF and then his first fight was against Castillo at LW..
So 'No' in short!
Well technically it was his second at lightweight but that fight was hardly a warm up fight at a new weight for him
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 09:53
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
viciousmaussa wrote:Blue wrote:states wrote:Harris asked for 750 grand. Warren said 'OK'. Harris then realised that Hatton would be making more. So he turned down the fight.
I don't deny that Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids. But Harris turned down the fight first. He had his reasons, but let's not rewrite history.
Hatton was going to be making more than the 'champion' (Harris was only WBA champion because of the WBA's amazing 'super champion' rules) because he was the draw, and he brought the money. Is that fair? Maybe not, and maybe Harris was within his rights to pull out. But the fact is he asked for a certain amount, he was offered it, and then he said no.
Harris turned down Warren’s offer but did not turn down the fight.
You said it yourself, “Warren/Hatton then opted out of purse bids.”
The champion was willing to fight the challenger in his home turf,
but he wanted to be paid an equitable sum to do so.
The purse bid is there to protect the champion from unreasonable
demands of a challenger.
Those rules were there when the Hatton camp bought their mandatory position.
It is you and the Hatton publicist that are trying to rewrite history.
But it is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Harris threw away a big payday, opted for an Urkal rematch, and got himself KO'd by Maussa. Either way, Hatton got that fool's title in the end. Harris' image as the next Mike McCallum took a serious hit and if he gets by Lazcano, he'll be over here for small money against nightmare sylist Witter. Harris stands to look like hell AND not earn much.
He didn't keep the WBA title for very long though did he? It seems your crediting Hatton for been a good business man rather than like Blue critisising him for not taking on the top challenges.
Harris didn't duck Hatton, he had a horrible contract that meant even from 750k he would have taken home around 50k. Harris has fought hard top10 fresh contenders that weren't quite elite while Hatton's jumped on old men or men with limited skills. Who's better - we may never know sadly for us fans (unless your a Hatton fan who doesn't want him to endager his winning streak).
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 13:07
by jamesmcdonnell
Manny Steward talked Harris out of the fight, he didn't fancy his chances. Why else would he ask for the fight to be staged in detroit, which isn't even a big boxing town any more?
Manny clearly wanted no part of that fight for his charge, but look what happened instead.
Harris would have gotten a career high payday, and let's face it, he's probably blown it now, when do we ever hear his name mentioned these days?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 13:20
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Manny Steward talked Harris out of the fight, he didn't fancy his chances. Why else would he ask for the fight to be staged in detroit, which isn't even a big boxing town any more?
Manny clearly wanted no part of that fight for his charge, but look what happened instead.
Harris would have gotten a career high payday, and let's face it, he's probably blown it now, when do we ever hear his name mentioned these days?
What a load of tosh, Harris would have got 50k for the fight because of the contract that he was under. Maybe Manny would have got a tiny piece of cake for that fight.
Lets not forget Team Harris thought by letting the fight go to purse bids the fight would still happen with the champ taking the large end of that purse.
All harris asked for was purse parity
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 13:31
by Andy Mac
MightyWarrior wrote:KO Artist wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:I thought the big announcement

was scheduled for yesterday?
My local mini cab firm got a call last week, asking if any drivers could boil down to 140 in the next month or so - coincidence?
As Dirty Harry said a good man always knows his limitations. Hobson and Hatton knows he is limited and he is not in the league of Cotto and Mayweather.
Hattons win over Tszyu really flattered him. Kostya was way past it.
Hobson and Hatton cannot afford to lose. So they will keep him winning, just, against average opposition.
I used to think Hatton would beat Witter, but now I reckon Junior would outpoint him.
Witer is the fresher of the two.
Hatton IS avioding him unashamedly.
Yes seems that way doesn't it. But Witter does make it easy for him to avoid the fight, with some recently dull performances.
Hennessey should put Witter in with an agressive pressure fighter, with a less than graninte chin. Junior needs a good KO.
Warren tends to get credit for looking after Ricky's career, but it does look like Hatton wasted his best years on forgetable WBU "defences" instead of mixing it with the likes of Harris & Cotto - they even turned down an old Sharmba Mitchell.
WRONG!!!!
Mitchell fought that muppet from the contender series, on the undercard of Hatton / Pederson. Hattons people then agreed to fight Mitchell.
Mitchell then pulled out, leaving Hatton to fight the same muppet. Stewart I think is his name.
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 13:39
by jamesmcdonnell
If anyone believes that Manyn and Harris wanted that fight with Hatton, then I guess you'll believe anything. What kind of contract did Harris sign, have you seen this contract, or, let me guess, you are taking the word of Vivian Harris?
Vivian has a reputation of being notoriously difficult to work with, which is why Main Events released him, they were sick and tired of his ridiculous demands and his dissapearing all the time, and refusing to speak to anyone. Of course, that is main events side of the story, (it was main events he was with wasn't it?), but I think it's pretty glib to take everythinig Harris said at the time as gospel.
So what made Harris think he was going to get purse parity? He knew damned well he wasn't going to get it, and so did Manny. When you have zero drawing power, how on earth do you hope to get purse parity with someone who can sell 16,000 tickets at home against pretty much anyone you choose and make a nice wad each time?
Manny Steward is no fool, he knew that if they asked for purse parity and home advantage, there was no way the fight would happen. He even said himself after the event that he didn't want the fight for Harris, and that he had advised him against taking it. The fight was on until Manny took over as manager, and his first act was to ensure he scuppered the fight.
Ask yourself this, why on earth would you stage the fight in Detroit? Harris couldn't fill his own living room in a house full of relatives, and who the fekk is going to turn out to watch in detroit? The place is a virtual ghost town these days, it's poor as hell.
You're being naive if you think that Harris and Steward wanted that fight. Steward knew there was a pretty big chance Harris loses, and it's not like Harris had any kind of following in the first place.
Re: Has latest stiff for Hatton been announced yet?
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 13:40
by Andy Mac
Roars Like Me wrote:Andy Mac wrote:search wrote:
Baldomir would beat Hatton IMO.
Cotto would take him at 140 or 147... body shots.
DE LA HOYA ("not the stuff of legends") would completely obliterate HATTON.
Didn't Floyd already deal with HAttons next "superfight" - castillo, when castillo was a better fighter?
No, Mayflower took care of JLC when he had just had 3 fights at Welter, then had another 4 straight after at similar weights after Mayflower.
Baldomir is a joke that asked for more to fight Hatton than Collazo, Lazcano, or any of the other fighters HBO approved for Hattons first fight for them.
Am i reading you Maywaether quote wrongly here?
PBF beat Castlillo via the judges rather than in the ring in most people's eyes. This was Floys's first fight at Light weight and Castliio's 5th, Not Welter etc?
Look at the fluctuation in Castillo's weight. In the 3 fights prior to Mayweather he fought at 135, 141, and 150. In between the 2 Mayweather fights he fought the career Light Welter Verdell Smith.
In the 3 fights directly after Mayweather he weighed 147, 146, and 145. The rest of his weight making troubles are well documented. Only the worst kind of Mayweather nuthugger would try to claim that Castillo's weight problems had no effect in the results of their fights.
The point is pretty obvious. After the trouble Castillo gave him even with the weight issues, dont expect Mayweather to fight anyone that brings pressure, it just wont happen.