Page 5 of 5
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 08:57
by billy nelson
JamieM wrote:Not sure regarding billy think he just trained him? Could be wrong. In fairness to tony he did try his best but he was based In Glasgow and let davidee do most of the work in dundee and was dependant on ronnie selling te show himself so would not surprise me regarding running a loss but don't know the facts. Home shows for ronnie consisted of having no opponent till week before constantly worrying the show will be pulled due to pull outs and ticket sales in which he was selling a few hundred yet still needing to do more hence why he went with tommy. Worry about fights not the promotion:) feel sorry on him as bit of a waste of time training hard but seems to be Scottish boxing on general with Morrison show peppered with pull puts and dropping show. Que billy coming on and Ricky is the saviour and Morrison would get ronnie fights etc. Yawn:)
Jamie I think you will find Ronnie actually approached Alex the day before he signed with Gilmour, however Alex never got back to him immediately hence he signed next day for Gilmour.
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 09:09
by JamieM
Billy its like buying a new car the way Ronnie approached the situation. He spoke to Tommy and Alex and a few others to see what they think etc and what they could offer him. Ronnie likes Alex as far as im aware but alex never followed up the interest which part you stated is true:) Just seems like boxing is full of empty promises. He hasnt asked for a world title fight he asked to fight regular and progress to not fighting a journeyman. Could Alex offer that? Alex has managed Ricky superb but his other fighters only fight when Ricky fights and thats not what Ronnie needs but hey can Tommy deliver that? I really dont think so either:) Ronnie will do his own thing and to be honest I wanted him to go with a promotor down south like Coldwell or Goodwin as they seem to be keeping fighters active, whereas Ronnie is fighting on dinner shows which in truth he will fight a journeyman every time :)
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 10:10
by expe
JamieM wrote:Not sure regarding billy think he just trained him? Could be wrong. In fairness to tony he did try his best but he was based In Glasgow and let davidee do most of the work in dundee and was dependant on ronnie selling te show himself so would not surprise me regarding running a loss but don't know the facts. Home shows for ronnie consisted of having no opponent till week before constantly worrying the show will be pulled due to pull outs and ticket sales in which he was selling a few hundred yet still needing to do more hence why he went with tommy. Worry about fights not the promotion:) feel sorry on him as bit of a waste of time training hard but seems to be Scottish boxing on general with Morrison show peppered with pull puts and dropping show. Que billy coming on and Ricky is the saviour and Morrison would get ronnie fights etc. Yawn:)
Tommy Gilmour - Fight journeymen on shitty dinner shows.
Alex Morrison - Fight on world title undercards live on sky
I know which one I'd prefer.
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 10:28
by billy nelson
expe wrote:JamieM wrote:Not sure regarding billy think he just trained him? Could be wrong. In fairness to tony he did try his best but he was based In Glasgow and let davidee do most of the work in dundee and was dependant on ronnie selling te show himself so would not surprise me regarding running a loss but don't know the facts. Home shows for ronnie consisted of having no opponent till week before constantly worrying the show will be pulled due to pull outs and ticket sales in which he was selling a few hundred yet still needing to do more hence why he went with tommy. Worry about fights not the promotion:) feel sorry on him as bit of a waste of time training hard but seems to be Scottish boxing on general with Morrison show peppered with pull puts and dropping show. Que billy coming on and Ricky is the saviour and Morrison would get ronnie fights etc. Yawn:)
Tommy Gilmour - Fight journeymen on shitty dinner shows.
Alex Morrison - Fight on world title undercards live on sky
I know which one I'd prefer.
Yes the fighter will get exposure on sky and fight on Alex other shows or fight on dinner shows or shows were 300 folk turn up
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 10:39
by JamieM
Alex hadn't been promoting shows billy till recently in Kilmarnock really and last show I went to was gorbals with Alex wasn't that busy. Also there was nothing saying ronnie was going to b fighting on sky either . Not all Morrison fighters do like Alex whyte Ryan Collins etc don't:) I have not spoke to ronnie in detail but he's kinda not going forward. Needs to step up a level wether he wins or not kinda pointless the fights he's been lined up with:)
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 13:32
by davidgaye
Stopping Kris Hughes and Paul Truscott.
Sure they would be delighted to be referred to in this way. One a former Commonwealth holder and one a challenger.(quote)
Wasn't referring to them two however there the best of a bad bunch Hughes doesn't belong at lightweight and truscott derry would stop inside 5 thats my opinion an don't mean to disrespect any boxer got 100% respect for anyone who steps between the ropes whether its your kristian laights or mayweather hardest sport out there all i was stating was it wasn't a smoke screen for anything i believe derry would box anyone
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 13:40
by billy nelson
JamieM wrote:Alex hadn't been promoting shows billy till recently in Kilmarnock really and last show I went to was gorbals with Alex wasn't that busy. Also there was nothing saying ronnie was going to b fighting on sky either . Not all Morrison fighters do like Alex whyte Ryan Collins etc don't:) I have not spoke to ronnie in detail but he's kinda not going forward. Needs to step up a level wether he wins or not kinda pointless the fights he's been lined up with:)
The last show at the gorbals was packed, show in Kilmarnock 2nd Nov and Glasgow Dec
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 14:46
by daviddee
billy nelson wrote:JamieM wrote:Alex hadn't been promoting shows billy till recently in Kilmarnock really and last show I went to was gorbals with Alex wasn't that busy. Also there was nothing saying ronnie was going to b fighting on sky either . Not all Morrison fighters do like Alex whyte Ryan Collins etc don't:) I have not spoke to ronnie in detail but he's kinda not going forward. Needs to step up a level wether he wins or not kinda pointless the fights he's been lined up with:)
The last show at the gorbals was packed, show in Kilmarnock 2nd Nov and Glasgow Dec
Billy the show at the Gorbals was not packed. We were their. There was no atmosphere and he put Ronnie on 2nd or 3rd and that's where the atmosphere was!! Common Sense you have a big support you put them on near the end!! We all walked out during the White v Al Hamidi fight as we weren't enjoying the show but in saying that it was better than the one on Friday I'm sorry to say.. Billy as for Ronnie's choice between Tommy and Alex I am with Jamie I actually thought he may be better staying with Tony than these 2.. I didn't know much about Tommy and didn't see how he could take Ronnie any further than Tony and Alex has a bundle of fighters he can't get on sky so he would also struggle to keep him active.. I believe he should of went down South he's a big talent who could end up having it wasted..
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 15:38
by billy nelson
I beleive if Ronnie had a bit more patience and lets face it with the amount of managers he's had in his 10 fights (4 managers) lol his patience is short, if he'd waited on AM getting back to him I'm positive he'd have had a title shot by now, instead of wasting his time doing an exhibition.
I think you will find Brophy ans Simmons were by far the biggest ticket sellers at the Gorbals that's why they were on at the end, Ronnie was but on early because he and his opponent weren't promoted by AM or that's what I think anyway
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 15:40
by billy nelson
also Dave unlike his previous managers TG won't just let him leave and we both know the score mate
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:04
by daviddee
billy nelson wrote:I beleive if Ronnie had a bit more patience and lets face it with the amount of managers he's had in his 10 fights (4 managers) lol his patience is short, if he'd waited on AM getting back to him I'm positive he'd have had a title shot by now, instead of wasting his time doing an exhibition.
I think you will find Brophy ans Simmons were by far the biggest ticket sellers at the Gorbals that's why they were on at the end, Ronnie was but on early because he and his opponent weren't promoted by AM or that's what I think anyway
We are talking about another show obviously Billy. Neither Simmons or Brophy were fighting. Was 12/5/2012 I think.. Ronnie's has so many managers as they can't seem to deliver for whatever reason. He only had 3 because Tony Lindie twice.. I think from Tony's point of view he has done his best he put everything into Ronnie and deserves credit as he worked very hard. Problem was he was struggling to keep going at times and was a bit out of his depth especially as a new manager. As for yourself. You couldn't get fights.. People genuinely refuse to fight when they hear it's Ronnie you seen this first hand. I don't think you could of got him the fights he needed and again that's not your fault I have been with Tony when managers have said if it's Ronnie Clark then it's a no.. As for Tommy it's early days not so good so far.. He delivered a commonwealth title for Limond.. I believe he has now realised how hard it is to match Ronnie and until Ronnie gets these titles it's going to be very hard unless he was with Warren or Hearn. Which in honesty I've been shocked neither have tried to sign him. People think I'm biased because he's my brother but end of the day I'm critical just like any other fan out there.
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:23
by expe
daviddee wrote:[
unless he was with Warren or Hearn. Which in honesty I've been shocked neither have tried to sign him. People think I'm biased because he's my brother but end of the day I'm critical just like any other fan out there.
What does he have to offer either? Warren doesn't put on shows in Scotland and the only Scottish fighter with Hearn is Burns, the undercard is provided by Alex Morrison. I really fail to see what all the fuss is about when Ronnie hasn't been able to beat Maxi Hughes and Ryan Walsh, neither of whom are at title level, Hughes is at area level.
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:27
by palooka
expe wrote:daviddee wrote:[
unless he was with Warren or Hearn. Which in honesty I've been shocked neither have tried to sign him. People think I'm biased because he's my brother but end of the day I'm critical just like any other fan out there.
What does he have to offer either? Warren doesn't put on shows in Scotland and the only Scottish fighter with Hearn is Burns, the undercard is provided by Alex Morrison. I really fail to see what all the fuss is about when Ronnie hasn't been able to beat Maxi Hughes and Ryan Walsh, neither of whom are at title level, Hughes is at area level.
There have been other boxers who improve with a bit of seasoning though; if he's willing to get in with good lads then it shows something; not every top level boxer is above everyone else all the time. He may benefit from a move to England with more sparring, more shows and better connected people (no offence intended to the Scottish contingent). I've not seen the lad box but Scotland seems a small pond; there'll be more competitive sparring and quality boxers in Manchester, Yorkshire, Birmingham or London though the deep fried mars bars are harder to find

Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 17:34
by daviddee
expe wrote:daviddee wrote:[
unless he was with Warren or Hearn. Which in honesty I've been shocked neither have tried to sign him. People think I'm biased because he's my brother but end of the day I'm critical just like any other fan out there.
What does he have to offer either? Warren doesn't put on shows in Scotland and the only Scottish fighter with Hearn is Burns, the undercard is provided by Alex Morrison. I really fail to see what all the fuss is about when Ronnie hasn't been able to beat Maxi Hughes and Ryan Walsh, neither of whom are at title level, Hughes is at area level.
He fought both on a few days notice.. Ryan Walsh isn't title level? He caused Selby nightmares probably the hardest fight he has has and Selby is closing in on world class. In most neutrals eyes Ronnie won both fights so really if he can do that on a few days notice what will he do with a proper training camp? What he brings isn't just how good he is.. If anyone gets a chance they should watch him he is very exciting to watch..hits hard and can take it back.. Been a lot of doubters changed there mind about Ronnie after seeing him fight!!
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 18:59
by mickey1975
billy nelson wrote:also Dave unlike his previous managers TG won't just let him leave and we both know the score mate
I know someone who was paying TG long after he had left. He wasn't releasing him for anyone, and this kid wasn't as good as Ronnie.
Re: Me v Mitchell
Posted: 14 Oct 2013, 01:41
by billy nelson
That was proberbly a decision made by the board they can tell a fighter they can be released as long as they pay the manager they want to leave a percentage for the remainder of the contract.